Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them [#permalink]
16 Feb 2012, 20:34
6
This post received KUDOS
5
This post was BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
95% (hard)
Question Stats:
47% (02:37) correct
53% (01:32) wrong based on 860 sessions
100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors?
100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them [#permalink]
16 Feb 2012, 20:51
10
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
calreg11 wrote:
100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors? 6 16 17 33 84
Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them [#permalink]
05 Mar 2012, 12:25
5
This post received KUDOS
question stem total=100 W=45 E= more than 38 W-and-E=x Neither=2x x? answer- 100=45+39+2x-x (to maximize x we need to minimize E. that is why E=39 the least value) x=16 _________________
Happy are those who dream dreams and are ready to pay the price to make them come true
I am still on all gmat forums. msg me if you want to ask me smth
Helpful Geometry formula sheet:best-geometry-93676.html I hope these will help to understand the basic concepts & strategies. Please Click ON KUDOS Button.
Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them [#permalink]
11 Apr 2014, 01:32
calreg11 wrote:
100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors?
A. 6 B. 16 C. 17 D. 33 E. 84
W + E - Both + Neither = 100
45 + E - (x) + 2x = 100
45 + E + x = 100
Now let us plug in answer options:
We cannot plug in 84 as E will become negative If we plug in x = 33 then E = 22 (Wrong as there are more than 38 editors) If we plug in x = 17 then E = 38 (Wrong as there are more than 38 editors) Hence answer is x= 16
Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them [#permalink]
03 Aug 2014, 16:32
Bunuel wrote:
calreg11 wrote:
100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors? 6 16 17 33 84
100=45+{Editors}-x+2x --> x=55-{Editors}. We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus x={Both}=55-39=16.
Answer: B.
Hope it's clear.
Hi Bunuel,
Can you please explain "100=45+{Editors}-x+2x --> x=55-{Editors}. We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus x={Both}=55-39=16."
I understand the concept that when we want to maximize something, we want to minimize the other, but why do we want to minimize editors? Aren't we trying to find the greatest number of editors AND writers? Shouldn't we want to MAXIMIZE Editors AND Writers?
Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them [#permalink]
03 Aug 2014, 19:14
This would be my approach,
there are 45 writers.. let that be; now lets say there are 38 editors, 'x' of whom are also writers, who are already accounted for as writers in that 45. So the number of editors who are not writers is (38-x).
Now the number of people who are neither writers or editors is 100 - [( No.of writers) + (No.of Editors who are not writers)], and we know this is 2x
100 - [ 45 + ( 38 -x ) ] = 2x x= 17 but since number of editors is MORE than 38, 'x' has to be less than 17, so if we assume no.of editors is just 1 more at 39, then x=16.
Re: 100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them [#permalink]
12 Aug 2014, 08:50
Expert's post
russ9 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
calreg11 wrote:
100 people are attending a newspaper conference. 45 of them are writers and more than 38 are editors. Of the people at the conference, x are both writers and editors and 2x are neither. What is the largest possible number of people who are both writers and editors? 6 16 17 33 84
100=45+{Editors}-x+2x --> x=55-{Editors}. We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus x={Both}=55-39=16.
Answer: B.
Hope it's clear.
Hi Bunuel,
Can you please explain "100=45+{Editors}-x+2x --> x=55-{Editors}. We want to maximize x, thus we should minimize {Editors}, minimum possible value of {Editors} is 39, thus x={Both}=55-39=16."
I understand the concept that when we want to maximize something, we want to minimize the other, but why do we want to minimize editors? Aren't we trying to find the greatest number of editors AND writers? Shouldn't we want to MAXIMIZE Editors AND Writers?
Thanks
We want to maximize x, which is {both writers and editors}. To maximize x, we need to minimize {Editors} because x = 55 - {Editors}.
As I’m halfway through my second year now, graduation is now rapidly approaching. I’ve neglected this blog in the last year, mainly because I felt I didn’...
Perhaps known best for its men’s basketball team – winners of five national championships, including last year’s – Duke University is also home to an elite full-time MBA...
Hilary Term has only started and we can feel the heat already. The two weeks have been packed with activities and submissions, giving a peek into what will follow...