Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Re: Factorial Problem [#permalink]
01 Dec 2005, 18:23
believe2 wrote:
laxieqv wrote:
rlevochkin wrote:
!1856/70^m is an integer. What is the maximum possible value of m.
since the fraction is an integer ---> 70^m is a factor of 1856! 1856: 70 = 26 26: 70 = 0 ---> the highest power of 70 in the factorial is 26
Agreed there are 26 70's in 1856 but 1876 is a factorial don't we want to consider numbers like 2,5,7 which can form another 70 ???
1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8...70...140.........1876
it seems like a loaded question!
you don't need to do this way, do like what i do is a short-cut which is used by several members here . Or you can use gamjatang's way, it's more understandable
doing my way, for example: what is the highest power n of 3 so that 3^n is a factor of 10!
take 10 : 3 = 3 , take this divisor 3 : 3 = 1 , take 1 : 3= 0 , add all the results to get the final answer : 3 +1+0=4 (you can check it)
Re: Factorial Problem [#permalink]
01 Dec 2005, 20:15
laxieqv wrote:
believe2 wrote:
laxieqv wrote:
rlevochkin wrote:
!1856/70^m is an integer. What is the maximum possible value of m.
since the fraction is an integer ---> 70^m is a factor of 1856! 1856: 70 = 26 26: 70 = 0 ---> the highest power of 70 in the factorial is 26
Agreed there are 26 70's in 1856 but 1876 is a factorial don't we want to consider numbers like 2,5,7 which can form another 70 ???
1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8...70...140.........1876
it seems like a loaded question!
you don't need to do this way, do like what i do is a short-cut which is used by several members here . Or you can use gamjatang's way, it's more understandable doing my way, for example: what is the highest power n of 3 so that 3^n is a factor of 10! take 10 : 3 = 3 , take this divisor 3 : 3 = 1 , take 1 : 3= 0 , add all the results to get the final answer : 3 +1+0=4 (you can check it)
..this method is good but do you think it only works in case of divisions by prime numbers?
consider the following case of :
what is the highest power n of 4 so that 4^n is a factor of 10!
by this method the ans would be 2, i think, but the actual answer should be 4.
=1 * 2 * 3 * 4 *5*6*7*8*9*10/4^4
i.e. 4,8 and then 2s from 2,6, 10 and rem(8/4) also make up 2 more 4s.
Re: Factorial Problem [#permalink]
01 Dec 2005, 20:25
believe2 wrote:
laxieqv wrote:
believe2 wrote:
laxieqv wrote:
rlevochkin wrote:
!1856/70^m is an integer. What is the maximum possible value of m.
since the fraction is an integer ---> 70^m is a factor of 1856! 1856: 70 = 26 26: 70 = 0 ---> the highest power of 70 in the factorial is 26
Agreed there are 26 70's in 1856 but 1876 is a factorial don't we want to consider numbers like 2,5,7 which can form another 70 ???
1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8...70...140.........1876
it seems like a loaded question!
you don't need to do this way, do like what i do is a short-cut which is used by several members here . Or you can use gamjatang's way, it's more understandable doing my way, for example: what is the highest power n of 3 so that 3^n is a factor of 10! take 10 : 3 = 3 , take this divisor 3 : 3 = 1 , take 1 : 3= 0 , add all the results to get the final answer : 3 +1+0=4 (you can check it)
..this method is good but do you think it only works in case of divisions by prime numbers?
consider the following case of :
what is the highest power n of 4 so that 4^n is a factor of 10!
by this method the ans would be 2, i think, but the actual answer should be 4.
=1 * [b]2 * 3 * 4 *5*6*7*8*9*10/4^4
i.e. 4,8 and then 2s from 2,6, 10 and rem(8/4) also make up 2 more 4s.[/[/b]quote]
you're considering 2^n , not 4^n , buddy ..is 2 a power of 4?!
Re: Factorial Problem [#permalink]
02 Dec 2005, 10:26
laxieqv wrote:
believe2 wrote:
laxieqv wrote:
believe2 wrote:
laxieqv wrote:
rlevochkin wrote:
!1856/70^m is an integer. What is the maximum possible value of m.
since the fraction is an integer ---> 70^m is a factor of 1856! 1856: 70 = 26 26: 70 = 0 ---> the highest power of 70 in the factorial is 26
Agreed there are 26 70's in 1856 but 1876 is a factorial don't we want to consider numbers like 2,5,7 which can form another 70 ???
1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8...70...140.........1876
it seems like a loaded question!
you don't need to do this way, do like what i do is a short-cut which is used by several members here . Or you can use gamjatang's way, it's more understandable doing my way, for example: what is the highest power n of 3 so that 3^n is a factor of 10! take 10 : 3 = 3 , take this divisor 3 : 3 = 1 , take 1 : 3= 0 , add all the results to get the final answer : 3 +1+0=4 (you can check it)
..this method is good but do you think it only works in case of divisions by prime numbers?
consider the following case of : what is the highest power n of 4 so that 4^n is a factor of 10! by this method the ans would be 2, i think, but the actual answer should be 4.
=1 * [b]2 * 3 * 4 *5*6*7*8*9*10/4^4
i.e. 4,8 and then 2s from 2,6, 10 and rem(8/4) also make up 2 more 4s.[/[/b]quote]
you're considering 2^n , not 4^n , buddy ..is 2 a power of 4?!
i learned from a teacher that when the number is not a prime number, you have to express it in its prime factors. in this case its 7*2*5. then you have to divide 1856 by each prime (the method mentioned above). the lowest of the values is the largest power of 70 than can divide 1856 !. _________________
If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.
I read this question in number property book. Sorry, I think they gave a wrong explanation. This one can be solved using 3-step method:
1. Factorize the number in the product of primes
2. Identify the prime with the lowest power.
3. Find that power, and that is a greatest power for the number.
1. 70=2*5*7
2. !1856/2^m, !1856/5^m, and !1856/7^m. Power of 7 has the lowest value.
3. !1856/7^m m=265+37+5+0=307
!1856/70^m, the greatest power of m=307 _________________
I read this question in number property book. Sorry, I think they gave a wrong explanation. This one can be solved using 3-step method:
1. Factorize the number in the product of primes 2. Identify the prime with the lowest power. 3. Find that power, and that is a greatest power for the number.
1. 70=2*5*7 2. !1856/2^m, !1856/5^m, and !1856/7^m. Power of 7 has the lowest value. 3. !1856/7^m m=265+37+5+0=307 !1856/70^m, the greatest power of m=307
uhm, let's take a simple example:
4^n as a factor of 10!
In your method, you'll write 4^n= 2^2n
10! has 2^8 as a maximum power ------> 2n=8--->n=4
now let's see: 10!= 1*2*3*4*5*6*7*8*9*10
only 4 and 8 contain power of 4 , that is to say n= 2
Clearly factorizing 4 into prime factors is wrong.
I read this question in number property book. Sorry, I think they gave a wrong explanation. This one can be solved using 3-step method:
1. Factorize the number in the product of primes 2. Identify the prime with the lowest power. 3. Find that power, and that is a greatest power for the number.
1. 70=2*5*7 2. !1856/2^m, !1856/5^m, and !1856/7^m. Power of 7 has the lowest value. 3. !1856/7^m m=265+37+5+0=307 !1856/70^m, the greatest power of m=307
uhm, let's take a simple example: 4^n as a factor of 10! In your method, you'll write 4^n= 2^2n 10! has 2^8 as a maximum power ------> 2n=8--->n=4 now let's see: 10!= 1*2*3*4*5*6*7*8*9*10 only 4 and 8 contain power of 4 , that is to say n= 2
Clearly factorizing 4 into prime factors is wrong.
All right, in this case, I would do it this way
!10/4^n
1. 4=2^2 I'll find greatest value for 2 Since 2 is already in the power of 2, the number has to be divided by 2 to avoid double count.
So, !10/2^m; m=5+2+1+0=8 Therefore, !10/4^n n=8/2=4
Which is not any different from what you did.
Well, basically there is no need to apply method that I was describing above in this case, cause there is only one prime factor, which is 2 _________________
Hard work is the main determinant of success
Last edited by rlevochkin on 02 Dec 2005, 20:23, edited 1 time in total.
12= 2*2*3 as your method, consider 3 15! = 1*2*3*4*5*6*7*8*9*10*11*12*13*14*15
--->biggest n = 6 but clearly 15! has only 12 as a power of 12
Are you trying to tell me that !15/12^n and n=1. I can't see how, we are looking for the greatest power of 12. 1 is not the greatest power of 12 here. I don't think you should really look at it this way. _________________
I read this question in number property book. Sorry, I think they gave a wrong explanation. This one can be solved using 3-step method:
1. Factorize the number in the product of primes 2. Identify the prime with the lowest power. 3. Find that power, and that is a greatest power for the number. 1. 70=2*5*7 2. !1856/2^m, !1856/5^m, and !1856/7^m. Power of 7 has the lowest value. 3. !1856/7^m m=265+37+5+0=307 !1856/70^m, the greatest power of m=307
Well, i reconsider and you're right! ....for non-prime number, we should factorize them. Anyway, thank you for pointing that out ..which source is this one from?! ...what if ETS also provides 26 as OE ...what should we do then?!