Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
I just want to start this thread to get an idea of which one is better or the best (if possible) of the 2-tier non-us bschool. It is very clearly that there is no need to discuss who is better, e.g. LBS, Insead, IMD etc. So far good international schools in 2-tier that i can come up with are: Oxford, Camb, HKUST, NUS, HEC(?), IESE, Ivey.
Because of my gmat and WE, i'd like to apply for these schools and i will be applying for HKUST for sure. Could anyone just share more lights on this topic?
don't mean to offend you but seriously dude ..Oxford, Camb, HKUST, NUS, HEC(?) -2nd tear?? which world are you living in ?
ended.... i guess 5-10 us schools are "2nd tier" too ? anyway, if you do tiers at least to by rankings of 10s or 20s... But i think international schools are "less known" so maybe the tier is a bit higher due to that? _________________
Thanks @bsd_lover, i guess my scope includes "Elites" and top one in each regions. Personally i think schools such as LBS, Insead and IMD (lot of arguments for IMD here ) can be recognized as 3 to 7 in US, so they are out of the scope. If you talk about this in US, i guess it will be between 10 to 20.
Sorry to bring up this "tier" thing, i guess near-elite and other regional schools can be categorized as 3rd tier. I will definitely apply for 2011 HKUST. However, i heard from someone that big names such as Oxford is better. I am not sure what "better" means here, probably they provide awesome class or just coz their brand?
Check out this awesome article about Anderson on Poets Quants, http://poetsandquants.com/2015/01/02/uclas-anderson-school-morphs-into-a-friendly-tech-hub/ . Anderson is a great place! Sorry for the lack of updates recently. I...