adkikani wrote:
Hi
GMATNinjaTwo GMATNinjaCan you please help to eliminate option B?
My understanding:
NowNews is still the most popular magazine covering cultural events in Kalopolis
But it has recently suffered a significant drop in advertising revenue because of falling circulation.
Reason for above:
Many readers have begun buying a competing magazine that is 0.5 cents cheaper than NoNews.
So what do NoNews publishers plan to do to increase advertising revenue which is related to higher circulation:
They plan to make it available at no charge.
In this question it is given "This proposal has a serious drawback, since...."
Now, this proposal has a serious drawback, (why?) The ans to why is OA, ie why will the plan fail?
B says one of reasons for people to buy competitor reporting is that later has better content, so even if NoNows publishers make magazine free, even then people will not but it.
Quote:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
NowNews, although still the most popular magazine covering cultural events in Kalopolis, has recently suffered a significant drop in advertising revenue because of falling circulation. Many readers have begun buying a competing magazine that, at 50 cents per copy, costs less than NowNews at $1.50 per copy. In order to boost circulation and thus increase advertising revenue, NowNews's publisher has proposed making it available at no charge, but this proposal has a serious drawback, since _______.
(A) Those Kalopolis residents with the greatest interest in cultural events are regular readers of both magazines.
(B) One reason NowNews's circulation fell was that its competitor's reporting on cultural events was superior.
(C) The newsstands and stores that currently sell NowNews will no longer carry it if it is being given away for free.
(D) At present, 10 percent of the total number of copies of each issue of NowNews are distributed free to students on college campuses in the Kalopolis area.
(E) NowNews's competitor would begin to lose large amounts of money if it were forced to lower its cover price.
(B) is tempting. If the other magazine features superior reporting, maybe people will still buy the competing magazine even if NowNews is free?
Notice that choice (B) says "
One reason NowNews's circulation fell..." If, instead, choice (B) said, "The ONLY reason NowNews's circulation fell...", then (B) would definitely pose a serious drawback.
But we are also told that there is a price difference. Perhaps reporting quality is a factor, but maybe customers care more about the price than the reporting quality. Choice (B) certainly works against the plan, but it doesn't necessarily represent a serious drawback or imply that the plan will fail.
Choice (C), on the other hand, definitely represents a serious drawback, so (C) is a better answer.
I hope that helps!
In this question it is given "However, this proposal has a serious drawback, since........" and we are finding "why plan will fail". But in one of the other
question on "SPEED HUMP" it was given "Identify a potential serious drawback to the plan for installing humps in Ardane" and answer is given on the lines that "which will result in potential drawback"
I am having problem in getting the logic whether we have to find "drawback in implementation" or "drawback of implementation" of the plan.