Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Aug 2015, 00:10
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

4 couples wish to stand in a row for a group photo. How many

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1104
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 0

4 couples wish to stand in a row for a group photo. How many [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 09:47
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

4 couples wish to stand in a row for a group photo. How many arrangements of the 8 people are possible if each person must stand next to his or her partner?

A. 324
B. 352
C. 384
D. 426
E. 512
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1104
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 0

Re: focusing on combinatorics [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 10:02
bmwhype2 wrote:
4! 2! 2! 2! 2! = 384


yeah ... it could also be written as 4!*2^4 which means...4! are the positions that all couples may have globally; 2^4 is 2^n and stands for the positions all persons can have in each couple...

can someone explain me the difference with 7-t56557
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2760
Location: New York City
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 420 [0], given: 4

Re: focusing on combinatorics [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 10:21
marcodonzelli wrote:
bmwhype2 wrote:
4! 2! 2! 2! 2! = 384


yeah ... it could also be written as 4!*2^4 which means...4! are the positions that all couples may have globally; 2^4 is 2^n and stands for the positions all persons can have in each couple...

can someone explain me the difference with 7-t56557

there is a sharp difference in the questions.
the one i posted is choosing 4 people into a group, in which we want no pairs.
In your question, you are simply arranging couples.
_________________

You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is 'never try'. -Homer Simpson

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1104
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 0

Re: focusing on combinatorics [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 10:24
bmwhype2 wrote:
marcodonzelli wrote:
bmwhype2 wrote:
4! 2! 2! 2! 2! = 384


yeah ... it could also be written as 4!*2^4 which means...4! are the positions that all couples may have globally; 2^4 is 2^n and stands for the positions all persons can have in each couple...

can someone explain me the difference with 7-t56557

there is a sharp difference in the questions.
the one i posted is choosing 4 people into a group, in which we want no pairs.
In your question, you are simply arranging couples.


yeah, I see...but why do we have to divide for 4! in your question? I face this kind of problems in combinatorics...
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2760
Location: New York City
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 420 [0], given: 4

Re: focusing on combinatorics [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 10:36
i think you are getting permutations and combinations confused.

formula for combinations is nCr where n!/r! (n-r)!
that is where the 4 comes from.
_________________

You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is 'never try'. -Homer Simpson

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2760
Location: New York City
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 420 [0], given: 4

Re: focusing on combinatorics [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 10:38
http://www.themathpage.com/aPreCalc/per ... s.htm#perm
_________________

You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is 'never try'. -Homer Simpson

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1576
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 2

Re: focusing on combinatorics [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 11:04
For this question, why is it wrong to think of it this way:

each couple can be put in one of 4 positions, so 4! for each of 4 couples. But, each couple can also be arranged in 2! ways.

Therfore, for each couple, the number of ways is 4!2! = 48 ways

For four couples, 48 x 4 = 192 ways
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2760
Location: New York City
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 420 [0], given: 4

Re: focusing on combinatorics [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 11:15
pmenon wrote:
For this question, why is it wrong to think of it this way:

each couple can be put in one of 4 positions, so 4! for each of 4 couples. But, each couple can also be arranged in 2! ways.

Therfore, for each couple, the number of ways is 4!2! = 48 ways

For four couples, 48 x 4 = 192 ways


because 4!*2! is different from 4*2!
arranging 4 elements vs multiplying by a constant of 4
_________________

You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is 'never try'. -Homer Simpson

Expert Post
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3574
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 432

Kudos [?]: 2341 [0], given: 359

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: focusing on combinatorics [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 12:44
Expert's post
bmwhype2 wrote:
4! 2! 2! 2! 2! = 384


Nice job!
Some hieroglyphs: 4P4*(2P2)^4 :)
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 227
Schools: Booth, Stern, Haas
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 2

Re: focusing on combinatorics [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 23:01
I didn't got the point with superscript, how did you come up with 4 in the power?
Expert Post
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3574
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 432

Kudos [?]: 2341 [0], given: 359

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: focusing on combinatorics [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2008, 00:58
Expert's post
kazakhb wrote:
I didn't got the point with superscript, how did you come up with 4 in the power?


4P4 - arrangements of 4 couples in a raw
2P2 - arrangements of 2 people in a couple.
(2P2)^4 - arrangements of 2 people within a couple for all 4 couples .
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Re: focusing on combinatorics   [#permalink] 03 Jan 2008, 00:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

4 couples wish to stand in a row for a group photo. How many

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.