Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

4 professors and 6 students are being considered for [#permalink]
27 Oct 2009, 05:28

1

This post received KUDOS

3

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

73% (02:06) correct
27% (01:03) wrong based on 288 sessions

4 professors and 6 students are being considered for membership on a supervisory committee which must consist of 3 people. If the committee has to include at least 1 professor, how many ways can this committee be formed?

A. 36 B. 60 C. 72 D. 80 E. 100

So my line of thinking was the following:

4 x 9 x 8 = 288 (professor) (total remaining) (total remaining)

Obviously I'm wrong. Would anyone care to tell me, how my logic is flawed?

Re: Why am I wrong? [#permalink]
27 Oct 2009, 07:03

andershv wrote:

My question is why the logic behind my proposed solution is wrong. Can anybody please explain?

you count up combinations twice.

4*9*8... and let me name 6 with students A,B,C,..,F after choosing a professor, when you choose Student A and B, you can choose A first, then B. Or B first, then A. Both combination are same.

Re: Why am I wrong? [#permalink]
27 Oct 2009, 07:20

yuskay wrote:

andershv wrote:

My question is why the logic behind my proposed solution is wrong. Can anybody please explain?

you count up combinations twice.

4*9*8... and let me name 6 with students A,B,C,..,F after choosing a professor, when you choose Student A and B, you can choose A first, then B. Or B first, then A. Both combination are same.

I don't think that's the only mistake.

100 is a factor of = 2^2*5^2 288 is a factor of = 2^5*3^2.

These are very different numbers and you cannot divide 288 with something to get to 100.

Re: Why am I wrong? [#permalink]
27 Oct 2009, 12:14

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

andershv wrote:

yuskay wrote:

andershv wrote:

My question is why the logic behind my proposed solution is wrong. Can anybody please explain?

you count up combinations twice.

4*9*8... and let me name 6 with students A,B,C,..,F after choosing a professor, when you choose Student A and B, you can choose A first, then B. Or B first, then A. Both combination are same.

I don't think that's the only mistake.

100 is a factor of = 2^2*5^2 288 is a factor of = 2^5*3^2.

These are very different numbers and you cannot divide 288 with something to get to 100.

4 professors and 6 students are being considered for membership on a supervisory committee which must consist of 3 people. If the committee has to include at least 1 professor, how many ways can this committee be formed? A. 36 B. 60 C. 72 D. 80 E. 100

At least one professor out of 3: \(C^3_{10}\) (total # of selection of 3 out of 10) minus 6\(C^3_6\) (# of selection of 3 person from 6 students, which means zero professor) = \(120-20=100\);

OR: \(C^1_4*C^2_6+C^2_4*C^1_6+C^3_4=100\);

Answer: E.

But you already know this. Your question is different:

And, I think I understand what you mean: saying that "288 and 100 are very different numbers", you may imply that we can not divide 288 by any factorial to compensate duplications, as we almost always do when order doesn't matter and when we need to get rid of the same selections.

But not this time: because here we may have THREE DIFFERENT cases (1p2s; 2p1s or 3p0s), with different factorial correction in each. For example case when we have 1 professor and 2 students needs the different factorial correction than case when we have 2 professors and 1 student. Hence, you can not divide 288 by one factorial (say 2! or 3!) to fix it. So 288 has duplications but it can not be compensated just by dividing it by any factorial.

Re: Combos where did i go wrong4 professors and 6 students are b [#permalink]
29 Sep 2010, 16:08

Jinglander wrote:

4 professors and 6 students are being considered for membership on a supervisory committee which must consist of 3 people. If the committee has to include at least 1 professor, how many ways can this committee be formed?

Answer is 100 i got it wrong

this is what I did

choose one prof first 4 way to do this. Then choose 2 from the remain 9 so 2C9 thus 4*2C9

I could also see doing this the way that generates the right answer which is 3C10 - 6C3. They both seem right

Re: Combos where did i go wrong4 professors and 6 students are b [#permalink]
29 Sep 2010, 16:21

Jinglander wrote:

4 professors and 6 students are being considered for membership on a supervisory committee which must consist of 3 people. If the committee has to include at least 1 professor, how many ways can this committee be formed?

Answer is 100 i got it wrong

this is what I did

choose one prof first 4 way to do this. [highlight]Then choose 2 from the remain 9 so 2C9 thus 4*2C9[/highlight]

I could also see doing this the way that generates the right answer which is 3C10 - 6C3. They both seem right

The above highlighted portion is incorrect. You should choose 2 from the 6 students and not the remaining 9 [3 Prof and 6 Students] since the 9 could introduce few more professors.

So please: Provide answer choices for PS questions.

randyrosales wrote:

From the GMAT Club Test, m25

"4 professors and 6 students are being considered for membership on a supervisory committee which must consist of 3 people. If the committee has to include at least 1 professor, how many ways can this committee be formed?"

What kind of problem is this? A probability/possibility problem? I superficially understand the answer but I don't understand the concept deeply:

10!/(7!3!) - 6!/(3!3!) = 100

Any explanation or being pointed to the right direction in the Manhattan GMAT books would be appreciated.

Re: Why am I wrong? [#permalink]
19 Nov 2011, 08:33

1

This post received KUDOS

Here's quoting Ian Stewart.

Quote:

Say your professors are A, B, C and D, and we choose a committee of three professors. If we choose A first, then choose B and C, we get the same committee as if we choose B first, then choose A and C; the order of the three professors does not matter. In your solution, you are assuming that the order of the professors does, at least partly, matter - you're picking one professor as the 'first professor', and then you're selecting the rest of the committee. Because of that, you're overcounting.

The answer you give would be correct if the question assigned a position to one of the committee members - for example, if it asked 'If a three person committee will be chosen, and one professor must be chosen as the chairperson of the committee, how many committees can be chosen?" We're then assigning a position to one professor, and your solution would be correct.

Re: Why am I wrong? [#permalink]
15 Jan 2012, 11:07

Can someone confirm if my logic makes any sense? (or if I am making stuff up because I found the correct answer somewhere else?). So...here we go.

10!/7!3! - This one highlights that there will be a committee to be formed out of a pool of 10 people. 7 of which will not get in and 3 of which will get in. The total for this item is 120. However, the 120 does not take into consideration the constraint highlighted in the problem which says that the committee must include one professor. (In the denominator, 3!, accounts for 3! individuals...but we don't know which ones are professors or students).

In order to accommodate for the constraint, we have to go out and calculate the composition of the committee if it didn't include professors. So we come up with...

6!/3!3! - 6 possible students that can get in. 3 which make the cut and the other 3 which do not. The total for this calculation yields 20.

So...now that we know that 20 only considers students, we need to go back and subtract that from the original calculation since that is a constraint in the problem. (i.e. the problem says it must include at least one professor

Re: Why am I wrong? [#permalink]
15 Jan 2012, 12:24

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

jgonza8 wrote:

Can someone confirm if my logic makes any sense? (or if I am making stuff up because I found the correct answer somewhere else?). So...here we go.

10!/7!3! - This one highlights that there will be a committee to be formed out of a pool of 10 people. 7 of which will not get in and 3 of which will get in. The total for this item is 120. However, the 120 does not take into consideration the constraint highlighted in the problem which says that the committee must include one professor. (In the denominator, 3!, accounts for 3! individuals...but we don't know which ones are professors or students).

In order to accommodate for the constraint, we have to go out and calculate the composition of the committee if it didn't include professors. So we come up with...

6!/3!3! - 6 possible students that can get in. 3 which make the cut and the other 3 which do not. The total for this calculation yields 20.

So...now that we know that 20 only considers students, we need to go back and subtract that from the original calculation since that is a constraint in the problem. (i.e. the problem says it must include at least one professor

Based on that 120-20 = 100...(E).

Thoughts?

All is correct except the red part. The committee has to include at least 1 professor (not one as you've written).

{The committees with at least one professor} = {Total committees possible} - {The committees with zero professors} (so minus the committees with only students in them).

{The committees with at least one professor} = {The committees with 1 professor / 2 students} + {The committees with 2 professors / 1 student} + {The committees with 3 professors / 0 students}:

Re: 4 professors and 6 students are being considered for [#permalink]
23 May 2013, 06:29

2

This post received KUDOS

vishnuvardhan777 wrote:

In the Picture, Slot 1 could be filled in

4 C ways (read as four-c-one) 1

After one professor is selected then total remaining are 9 people (3 prof + 6 students) so slots 2 and 3 can be filled in

9 C * 2! ways 2

Please let me know, what is error in the logic

The red part is not correct. The correct formula is \((#Tot) C (#Slots)\), so in the case with 1 prof and 2 students we have: 4(#Prof) C 1(#SlotsP) * 6(#Stud) C 2(#SlotsS)

the committee must include one professor 1 professor, 2 students: \(4C1*6C2=60\) 2 professors, 1 student: \(4C2*6C1=36\) 3 professors, 0 students: \(4C3*6C0=4\)

Total number = 100

Hope it's clear _________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Re: 4 professors and 6 students are being considered for [#permalink]
23 May 2013, 07:10

vishnuvardhan777 wrote:

Thanks Zarrolou; I understood the explanation.

Can you please reason, why i should not take the second part as 9c2 (read as nine see two).

(I am considering the case 1 Prof and 2 Students, the reasoning is the same for the others)

You have \(3\) slots. \(1\) will be occupied by professor and \(2\) by a students. Lets focus on the professors: there are \(4\) of those and you have \(1\) slot => tot comb = \(4C1\). Same thing for the students: there are \(6\) of those and you have \(2\) slots => tot comb = \(6C2\).

Tot cases of 1 Prof and 2 Stud = \(4C1*6C2=60\)

In your method you correctly choose 1 prof in \(4C1\) ways, but you cannot take \(9C2\) as the second term because you are not choosing from a pool of 9, but from a pool of 6 (students ONLY in this case). So the correct form is \(6C2\)

Hope it makes sense, let me know _________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Re: 4 professors and 6 students are being considered for [#permalink]
07 Sep 2013, 23:50

why i can not do like this:

formation has to have at-least 1 professor : we chose no of ways i can select 1 professor : 4c1= 4 ways no we have to select 2 more people and since our requirement of atleast 1 professor is already met can we not select the remaining 2 people out of 9 in 9c2 ways i.e (9*8*7!)/(2!*7!)=36 ways so total no of ways=4*36

i know i am doing something wrong , can i get some help please

gmatclubot

Re: 4 professors and 6 students are being considered for
[#permalink]
07 Sep 2013, 23:50

On September 6, 2015, I started my MBA journey at London Business School. I took some pictures on my way from the airport to school, and uploaded them on...

When I was growing up, I read a story about a piccolo player. A master orchestra conductor came to town and he decided to practice with the largest orchestra...

Last week, hundreds of first-year and second-year students traversed the globe as part of KWEST: Kellogg Worldwide Experience and Service Trip. Kyle Burr, one of the student-run KWEST executive...