Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 30 Aug 2016, 02:58

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

6 Key Takeaways from GMAC News on IR Score and Admissions

Author Message
GMAT Pill Representative
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2006
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 378

Kudos [?]: 1194 [12] , given: 8

6 Key Takeaways from GMAC News on IR Score and Admissions [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jul 2013, 11:05
12
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED

TheIR (Integrated Reasoning) section has been out for 1 year - so what are the stats and implications for MBA admissions now that bschools can better make sense of it?

Well, the average (mean) IR score was a 4.34 / 8.00 with a standard deviation of 2.1

Keep in mind 95% of all scores lie within 2 standard deviations of the mean.
That means 95% of IR scores are between 2.24 and 6.44 -- of course keep in mind this is not a normal distribution since the scores go by intervals of 1.

This is based on a sample size of 196,712

KEY TAKEAWAYS

1) The IR score is becoming more and more versatile.

Now with 1 year of stats, MBA admissions committee can begin to better understand the score in the context of other applicant stats.

What specifically does it mean for you?

Well, if you come from an applicant pool that already has a high GMAT score - then having a high IR score will help you stand out.

This is particularly true if a school gets a lot of applicants with a high GMAT Quant score. There are many students in the Q48+ range -- right now the difference between ~2 quant questions can drop you down below the 90th percentile. But the difference between Q48 and Q50 is not a compelling enough difference for an admissions officer to prefer the Q50 candidate over the Q48 candidate.

Hypothetical Example, if we take 2 candidates:
Candidate A: Q48 / IR 8
Candidate B: Q50 / IR 5

It becomes more compelling to admissions officers that Candidate A is the stronger candidate.

You'll see the IR "value" in an applicant pool that has a large discrepancy between GMAT score and IR score - namely China and India. If you are a Chinese or Indian applicant - having a high IR score can you give you that extra oomph!

2) IR scores Are Important for MBA Scholarships

For those following GMAT Pill, you may be aware that we have placed multiple students to top business schools by not only helping them with the 800 total score, but also helping them on the IR section.

The IR section is quite important for MBA scholarships. Why?

Because when a school decides which applicants to give scholarships to - they want to know that they are investing in someone solid - someone who the recruiting firms will love. Someone who can solidly integrate information and make good choices. The IR score can be an important factor in this big money decision for the school.

Case in point: Our student (and GMAT Pill instructor) James - not only scored a GMAT 770 - but ALSO got an IR score of an 8/8 AND an AWA score of 6/6. It's no coincidence that he received a \$93k MBA Scholarship from London Business School.

3) The IR score is important for Consultants

We mentioned above that consultants already like high GMATs and high GPAs. Well, now they're going to like high IR scores as well -- since IR tests the very same skills that consultants use every day.

Currently, you have to wait for your official score report to see your IR score. In the future, you won't have to wait - it'll automatically be calculated and printed right onto your unofficial score report before you leave the exam test center.

5) Your official score reports will arrive sooner.

Currently, the GMAC folks say your report will arrive within 20 days. Realistically, they've gotten that time closer to 1 week. They still reserve the right to say that you will receive the report in < 20 days, but most likely, you'll be receiving them much sooner.

6) Your IR score COULD potentially be integrated into the composite 800 score in the future.

Some business school staff have voiced their opinion about having one single total score on the 800 score with 4 subdivisions - quant/verbal/awa/ir.

Currently, the 800 score only has 2 subdivisions -quant and verbal.

Of course, GMAC would survey more schools to examine the implications of such a move before making a decision. Even if they were to make the move, it may take several years to adjust the scoring scale, etc.

We at GMAT Pill believe this would be the right move. Not only would admissions staff be better able to make sense of the score report, but it would also put greater emphasis on the IR score since it actually MATTERS towards our 800 score - the number that people compare with each other - the number that is published by all the top business school rankings, etc.

GMAC says no promises, but they will investigate the possibility.

GMAC folks ran the numbers and found that there indeed is a discrepancy between the average GMAT score and the corresponding IR score - by country.

The greatest discrepancy lies in applicants from Asia - people in Asia tend to have very high GMAT scores relative to applicants from other countries, but their IR scores don't seem to keep up in the rankings.

What does this mean?

Well, it means that if you're an applicant from Asia (primarily China and India) - having a high IR score IN ADDITION to your high GMAT score will help you stand out from the crowd. MBA programs can now better distinguish you from all your peers who also have a strong verbal/quant score if you ALSO have a high IR score. This is true everywhere, but particularly true in Asia.

It is also interesting to note that both Australia and the US have the least discrepancy between average 800 Total score and average IR score.

Of all the major testing metrics, IR seems to have significant potential in terms of predicting your graduate GPA.

Of course, the data may not be accurate, but based on their findings, IR surpasses the Total 800 score, AWA score, and undergraduate GPA in terms of predicting your GPA in the graduate program.

Now, how does the IR score help admissions folks figure out who to admit and who not to admit?

How?

Well, you see the blue circle above? Only a small percentage of test takers score a 1, 2, or 3 -- 2%, 3%, and 6%, respectively. Although not always true, an adcom member might look at multiple applicants with GMAT scores of 650 and up. But only a few of them bombed the Integrated Reasoning section.

Takeaway: Don't be one of those applicants with a 650 or higher who bombs the IR section. You will stick out!

For applicants from India/China scoring 650 or higher - make an effort to score on the slightly higher end for IR - you don't need an 8, but shoot for a 6 or 7 and it'll help you stand out from all the other applicants from your region with a high GMAT score.

For less competitive MBA programs, a high IR score can also help you stand out. Notice the percentage of applicants scoring a 1, 2 or 3 are generally higher --- 6%, 10%, and 14%, respectively. This adds up to 30% of applicants scoring in the 1, 2, or 3 range - relatively high. So if you happen to be one of the few applicants scoring a 6, 7, or 8 - you'll really stand out.

The IR score has only been out for 1 year, but the initial surveys show that the average IR score for MBAs going into Consulting, Operations, and Finance are significantly higher the average IR score for MBAs going into human resources, marketing, or general management.

In particular, during the conference call with GMAC - we had a discussion about how top consulting firms (McKinsey, Bain, BCG, Booz, etc) are starting to ask applicants for IR scores.

The prediction is that consultants will use IR scores to help evaluate candidates.

Why?

Because the skills tested in IR are exactly what consultants use. For consultants - especially management consultants - it's all about understanding what the big picture items are, and what the key takeaways are. You take a bunch of numbers, find the patterns, and figure out what to do with the data.

As a former management consultant with Booz & Company, I can confirm this need for IR skills on the job. Indeed, it would make sense for top consulting firms to start asking for IR scores in an effort to better weed out candidates.

Consulting firms generally like people with high GPAs and high GMAT scores.

In the future, I would imagine that consulting firms will like high IR scores even more so since IR directly tests the skills that consultants use on a daily basis. Management consulting firms may even ask for your GMAT/IR score combo on your resume and they may use this as a screening tool in their recruiting process.

So certainly if you are hoping to enter management consulting as a career route, put in the effort now and make sure you do well on the IR section of the GMAT exam.

In Conclusion

In conclusion, the IR score has now been out for 1 year and admissions committees can now better make sense of the score in the context of all other applicant stats.

Some insights including the high discrepancy between 800 scores and IR scores for applicants from Asia - or that only a small % of applicants scoring 650 and up bomb the IR section, etc -- all of these insights can help you figure out how important IR score are for your particular demographic background.

For some applicants, having a "good enough IR score of at least 4 will make the cut.

For others shooting for an MBA scholarship - it's helpful to score super high in all categories - verbal, quant, AWA, and IR. As shown above, our student and instructor James scored high in all 4 categories. It's no coincidence that he ended up with the top MBA scholarship (full tuition) from a top business school - London Business School.

Even outside of admissions, the IR score may have implications in corporate recruiting. Management consulting firms, in particular, will be interested in applicants who have scored high in IR.

Lastly, the GMAC folks will be including your IR score on your unofficial score report in Fall 2013 and may potentially investigate the possibility of combining all 4 scores into one composite score of 800. We'll see if that happens in a couple years - we think it would be the right move.

_________________

Last edited by GMATPill on 16 Jul 2013, 12:23, edited 1 time in total.
VP
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 1113
Concentration: Healthcare, Strategy
Schools: Duke '16 (M)
Followers: 78

Kudos [?]: 489 [0], given: 463

Re: 6 Key Takeaways from GMAC News on IR Score and Admissions [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jul 2013, 11:41
For most part, this looks like advertisement of IR section by the GMAC.

That said, there are interesting stats in there. Asian kids scoring that low in IR definitely surprises me.
Moderator
Joined: 10 May 2010
Posts: 823
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 389 [0], given: 192

Re: 6 Key Takeaways from GMAC News on IR Score and Admissions [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jul 2013, 02:02
GMATPill wrote:

There are many students in the Q48+ range -- right now the difference between ~2 quant questions can drop you down below the 90th percentile. But the difference between Q48 and Q50 is not a compelling enough difference for an admissions officer to prefer the Q50 candidate over the Q48 candidate.

Hypothetical Example, if we take 2 candidates:
Candidate A: Q48 / IR 8
Candidate B: Q50 / IR 5

It becomes more compelling to admissions officers that Candidate A is the stronger candidate.

Will disagree a bit. A difference of 2 quant questions will NOT drop someone from Q50 to Q48.
Difference between Q48 and Q50 translates to a difference of 20 and in some cases 30 points on the 3 digit GMAT score.

So in reality we have two candidates

Candidate A: 690 (Q48 V35) / IR 8
Candidate B: 710 (Q50 V35) / IR 5

Which candidate would be more appealing to Adcoms ?

One reason Asians are NOT doing well on IR could be because Asians are in a more competitive pool in terms of overall GMAT score, and they would want to avoid IR to maximize the GMAT score.
_________________

The question is not can you rise up to iconic! The real question is will you ?

Intern
Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Posts: 8
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 6

Re: 6 Key Takeaways from GMAC News on IR Score and Admissions [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jul 2013, 05:33
Nice article! Who do you is better (without taking into account IR)?
Candidate A with 650 and 5.0 AWA
Candidate B with 620 and 5.5 AWA

Now, with IR, candidate A and B with the same figures but different IR, 4 and 6, reqpectively, who is better?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2 please excuse me for any errors in typing
GMAT Pill Representative
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2006
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 378

Kudos [?]: 1194 [0], given: 8

Re: 6 Key Takeaways from GMAC News on IR Score and Admissions [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jul 2013, 11:22
AbhiJ wrote:
GMATPill wrote:

There are many students in the Q48+ range -- right now the difference between ~2 quant questions can drop you down below the 90th percentile. But the difference between Q48 and Q50 is not a compelling enough difference for an admissions officer to prefer the Q50 candidate over the Q48 candidate.

Hypothetical Example, if we take 2 candidates:
Candidate A: Q48 / IR 8
Candidate B: Q50 / IR 5

It becomes more compelling to admissions officers that Candidate A is the stronger candidate.

Will disagree a bit. A difference of 2 quant questions will NOT drop someone from Q50 to Q48.
Difference between Q48 and Q50 translates to a difference of 20 and in some cases 30 points on the 3 digit GMAT score.

So in reality we have two candidates

Candidate A: 690 (Q48 V35) / IR 8
Candidate B: 710 (Q50 V35) / IR 5

Which candidate would be more appealing to Adcoms ?

One reason Asians are NOT doing well on IR could be because Asians are in a more competitive pool in terms of overall GMAT score, and they would want to avoid IR to maximize the GMAT score.

While not necessary, it certainly is possible for the difference between Q50 and Q48 to be 2 questions. Of course, there is no perfect formula since the test is adaptive - and it really depends on the algorithm, how difficult the questions you received previously, etc.

In the example you provided - it's a close call. Last year (and perhaps this year as well) - the 710 might have been preferred. But keep in mind this is just one data point.

For a "2nd tier business school" that would look to boost their image in school rankings by having a higher average GMAT score for its student body - that school might prefer candidate B with the 710.

But going forward, as IR gains importance and especially if the score is ever integrated into the 800 scale, candidate A may become more and more appealing. Imagine if US News & Report, Businessweek, etc - all the rankings include average IR score. If they ever do that, then candidate A may become more favorable over time.

Of course it depends on the candidate as well. If the candidate has demonstrated strong and continued interest in management consulting - the 690 + IR score of 8 might be looked upon as competitive - for that particular applicant's purposes. If the school already has lots of super high GMAT scores and this particular candidate with 690 + 8 IR has some unique attributes/work experience, etc - then this 690 candidate could be favored over a 710 candidate with 5 IR.

A lot of this is open to interpretation and it really depends on the school as well as the applicant's background.
_________________
GMAT Pill Representative
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2006
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 378

Kudos [?]: 1194 [1] , given: 8

Re: 6 Key Takeaways from GMAC News on IR Score and Admissions [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jul 2013, 11:25
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
lauhub wrote:
Nice article! Who do you is better (without taking into account IR)?
Candidate A with 650 and 5.0 AWA
Candidate B with 620 and 5.5 AWA

Now, with IR, candidate A and B with the same figures but different IR, 4 and 6, reqpectively, who is better?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2 please excuse me for any errors in typing

In this case, I'm inclined to say that candidate A would still be preferred. Candidate A could have been a 700 guy, but just had a bad day on the test and got 650. Candidate B could have been a 580 guy, but had a lucky day and got 620. The two scores tend to be part of two different psychological piles - 650 to 700 versus 620 to 650.

Also, IR 6 is not a strong enough difference to catch someone's attention. The max score is 8.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 9
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 4
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 217 [0], given: 2

Re: 6 Key Takeaways from GMAC News on IR Score and Admissions [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jul 2013, 19:00
How do they already have stats linking IR with b-school grades? If it's only been a year, wouldn't those who wrote GMATs with the IR only have been admitted thusfar and be matriculation this fall?
Re: 6 Key Takeaways from GMAC News on IR Score and Admissions   [#permalink] 17 Jul 2013, 19:00
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
22 Exciting Announcement from GMAC: NEW Score Reporting Policy 24 25 Jun 2014, 08:15
5 News from GMAC's Summit 0 11 Dec 2013, 07:10
Any changes in the new GMAT apart from IR 1 22 Jul 2013, 05:50
GMAC's 'jazzy' take on IR: 3 26 Feb 2013, 16:31
8 6 Key Takeaways from the GMAT Test Prep Summit 2013 4 22 Feb 2013, 21:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

6 Key Takeaways from GMAC News on IR Score and Admissions

Moderators: HiLine, WaterFlowsUp

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.