Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 04:47

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

730 Q-49 V-40

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 63
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

730 Q-49 V-40 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2004, 13:29
First of all, I'd like to point out that what you are about to read will not be a fluffy happy go-lucky account of how a college slacker over-achieved on the GMAT. This is all true, but not helpful. The story that may be helpful is how I went from a journalism and economics double-major with only remedial math classes to a solid score. I decided last summer that I wanted to take the GMAT and that two months would be enough time to study for the test. My first Princeton test score was a 620, and my highest a 670. I learned about the GMAT's format while I studied and scored a 700 (45, 41). I considered the 700 to be a threshold score for me at the time and took a break.

Then I realized that with decent grades (3.5 with easy courses), and no work experience I was going to need a better performance on the GMAT. This is where the story changes from background info to study techniques. I bought a new version of OG on Amazon and decided to study it dilligently. The math questions in OG are variations of what you will see on the test. On the test, some questions will remind you of particular problems you studied, others appear to be near carbon copies (this time anyway), and some can be answered because the analytical skills developed studying OG can enhance a non-math majors quant ability (for others the analytical skill might be in place). For the math, I didn't find anything nearly as useful as the OG. At the 49 level, perm and comb problems are going to be easy enough to answer with only the formulas and some intuition.

The verbal section I didn't improve my score at all. In fact, it went down a point, which surprised me. I was scoring in the 43 and 44 range on the powerpreps. I have no advice on verbal because my final score was the same as the score I received on both my first Princeton and first PP tests.

I think that the best advice I could give would regard pacing. I realize that this is a controversial issue (since nobody knows what pace is best) so I urge you to only consider my suggestion. When I took the test the first time, particularly on the math, I worried about getting the first ten questions right. The first ten or so are supposed to be greater determinants of final score. I agree 100 percent. However, some might overstate this. When I took the test I checked the first ten twice (even when I was 99 per. sure I was right). I wasted a total of appr. 10 minutes on the first ten because I changed none of my answers. This extra time is crucial to scoring well later in the test. Having greater self assurance is not reflected in the score. The score does not calculate how confident you are. I improved my math score 4 points by moving on when I was confident with my answer. I imagine there are other people who need to learn to move on.

I realize that this post is long, but I am not self-absorbed. Others at this site have scored better, and some worse, but we all have credibility in saying what is best for us personally. I'd like lots of questions, because I would like to try to answer them (in detail LOL) and help if I can. I'd also like to thank Akamai Brah for his passion, Stoolfi for his inspirational scores, and everyone who has posted a score they're not happy with for their character.
_________________

Paul

Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2004, 13:36
Congratulation Pkatz, very nice score and a very inspiring post also. All the best
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 427
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2004, 13:49
Great Score pkatz. All the best for the applications.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 462
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2004, 15:13
Good Work..PKatz...any suggestion to improve RC score.
Best of Luck for your apps.


Vivek.
_________________

"Start By Doing What Is Necessary ,Then What Is Possible & Suddenly You Will Realise That You Are Doing The Impossible"

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 503
Location: 55405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2004, 17:25
Nice work, Paul.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Apr 2003
Posts: 228
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2004, 20:10
Congrats PKatz !!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 63
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2004, 22:43
Thanks a million for the kind words. As far as improving reading comprehension, I would like to respectfully disqualify my advice. Not because I'm unwilling to offer it but because my score decreased in that category. Any conscious effort I made to improve the score was clearly to my detriment. Basically, I'd like to spare innocent bystanders.

However there was something bizarre about this months' verbal. I obviously have a conflict of interest in saying this, but it seemed awfully easy and yet I scored as low as I ever have on any practice test. Someone else mentioned that they felt great about verbal, had averaged 720's on powerpreps and scored a 29 on verbal. I've never been so confident about my answers, and been so far off in predicting my own score.
_________________

Paul

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 31 May 2003
Posts: 18
Location: Bay Area, CA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Feb 2004, 12:48
[quote="pkatz"]...
However there was something bizarre about this months' verbal. I obviously have a conflict of interest in saying this, but it seemed awfully easy and yet I scored as low as I ever have on any practice test. Someone else mentioned that they felt great about verbal, had averaged 720's on powerpreps and scored a 29 on verbal. I've never been so confident about my answers, and been so far off in predicting my own score.[/quote]

Could you please point out specifically which portion (CR/ SC/ RC) seemed surreptitiously innocuous? Or was that a general observation? I am taking my test in a week's time and am just curious.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 63
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Feb 2004, 13:11
Hi there. I kind of regretted saying that because in retrospect, I might have started off poorly and received easy questions because I didn't build to a high enough level of difficulty to score well.

Alright the RC's seemed easy, and the first one I got was very short as well (40 lines). The general themes were easy to spot, and the answers were in plain sight. The problem with knowing which section was surreptitiously easy is that I don't know what I missed. If I got an answer right, and the question seemed easy then there was nothing deceptive about the level of difficulty.

I also thought I was doing very well because I got bold-faced CR's toward the end (two in a row), and figured that suggested a higher level question. Obviously not. I think that the theme to take away is that two of three February posters have gotten scores lower than they had on previous practice tests (the other guy shockingly lower). Stay intense all the way through verbal and you'll have more success than we did.

I thought the OG math was very much in line with what I saw.
_________________

Paul

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 345
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Feb 2004, 04:19
how many months of prep did it take to score this high?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 63
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Feb 2004, 19:34
Hi Mirhaque, I studied for two months the first time I took the test and scored a 700. I took some time off and studied for one more month before re-taking and scored this.

I think that it's a lot easier to improve the math score, so I spent a lot of time studying Kaplan's basic math book. I then did hundreds of data sufficiency questions to make sure that I could answer the toughest math questions. I got some of them anyway. I think going through the last 75 data sufficiency questions in the official guide is a tremendous help. Read the explanations carefully and repeat.

There are some good problem solving questions as well but they really don't seem to be nearly as hard as the real thing. For these I recommend the all-purpose kaplan book which has some really thought provoking and tough questions. Ultimately I think a comprehensive math review is the quickest and most reliable way to improve one's score.

I should be getting my AWA's soon. It's been ten days. I'll share them when they arrive. Any other questions I'll be happy to offer my two cents.
_________________

Paul

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 63
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Feb 2004, 16:08
14 days and no official scores. Should I be freaked out!!!!!!!!????? Okay maybe I'm overreacting, but I could have sworn the proctor said UNDER two weeks.
_________________

Paul

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2004
Posts: 5
Location: USA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Feb 2004, 08:03
pkatz,

How many total RC you got?
please tell me how many question in each RC ?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 63
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 28 Feb 2004, 12:59
On the 18th day I get my official scores! A 5.5 AWA, which is okay I suppose. I wonder whether the computer or the person gave me a 6, hmmmm. I think that difference should matter.

I now have to finish college and make sure I don't botch my grade in linear algebra. But it's good to get this out of the way so that I can work for a while and apply in a couple of years. Hopefully the GMAT averages at the top schools won't be 750 at that point. I'll save my books just in case.

Moma, I don't remember how many RC questions I got. I had about three passages though. Assume it's the normal amount.
_________________

Paul

  [#permalink] 28 Feb 2004, 12:59
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic 680 to 730 q49v40 ss87 8 17 Dec 2011, 21:12
44 Done and dusted!! 730 (Q49 V40) sidhu4u 62 23 Jul 2010, 10:05
My experience 730(Q49,V40) manoharpln 4 27 Apr 2010, 12:20
730 (Q49, V40) - Final installment subhen 23 02 Oct 2007, 22:22
Done 730 (V40 Q49) gotoknow3 11 12 Nov 2005, 21:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by

730 Q-49 V-40

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: TGC, m3equals333



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.