Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 17:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

750 but low quant - retake?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 173
Schools: Harvard Business School, Stanford
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 9

Re: 750 but low quant - retake? [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2009, 00:14
jallenmorris wrote:
Retake from a 750? Are you insane?

Consider this: Last year Stanford dinged every single perfect score applicant that applied. What's the significance? Stanford doesn't care about score. If I were on the panel, I might vote to ding every single one just to make a statement: NO SCORE IS AN AUTOMATIC ADMIT.

If you retake, what message will you be sending admissions committees? You got a 750 first time around, 98% percentile. Meaning that you beat out all but 2% of the entire population ever to take the GMAT ("ever to take" works in theory). The AdCom will see your 750 first time take and then a retake that, if you improve is somewhere between 760 and 800. The 800 of course places you in a group of perfectionist, which would be reinforced by looking at your testing history and the adcoms will see First Attemp: 750, Second Attempt: 800. Schools don't want someone that is perfect, they want people that will be good classmates and strive for perfection while realizing that perfection is rarely achieved. There is always a ROI. You might write a 98% perfect paper and it takes you 6 hours to write it. Then to improve that paper from 98% perfect to 100% perfect takes you another 20 hours. Honestly, is this extra 20 hours worth the 2%? What was the return on your 20 hour investment? 0.1% per hour?

It's your decision, but my advice is to not ever take the GMAT again (as long as you apply within 5 years) because you will be sending the wrong message to the b-school adcoms. That message is that you are more interested in perfection that utility. Schools need someone that can someday go manage a company, not just take tests to perfection. No one gets 100% correct in a business environemnt for which you're being prepared during b-school.


Can't say more. Pure and Gold!!!
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: 750 but low quant - retake? [#permalink] New post 23 Sep 2009, 19:38
750 is a pretty high score. But with your V scores already high, I'm sure you can definitely reach even 780 if you improve on the Q side.

Then again, do you really need such a high score to get into the top business schools? :wink:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Posts: 58
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: 750 but low quant - retake? [#permalink] New post 25 Sep 2009, 12:10
I think its an amazing score to get in top 5 schools .Rest you should try to make your application strong by investing time into that .Alsokeep an eye on the deadlines for this year just in case you want to apply for this year .
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2008
Posts: 186
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 3

Re: 750 but low quant - retake? [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2009, 11:35
great score.. Congrats..
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Nov 2009
Posts: 1
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: 750 but low quant - retake? [#permalink] New post 21 Nov 2009, 18:23
I am in a similar situation:
750
Q: 44 (69th percentile)
V: 50 (99th percentile)

I was doing slightly better on the Q section in practice tests, although I never felt like I mastered some of the math, and could probably improve with more studying. That being said, I'm not sure I could repeat the 50 in verbal if I took it again. I am currently an analyst at a hedge fund, so I feel like my quantitative skills are pretty good, but I was a history major in college with limited coursework in quant subjects (pretty good grades in the quant classes though). Although I was happy with my score, I'm now nervous that my Q is to low. My top choices and Columbia and NYU. Any thoughts?
Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: Consortium (CGSM.org), NSHMBA
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 937
Location: New Haven
Schools: Yale SOM Class of 2012
WE 1: Investment Banking Summer Associate (Boutique tech M&A)
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 217 [0], given: 113

Reviews Badge
Re: 750 but low quant - retake? [#permalink] New post 21 Nov 2009, 22:40
jallenmorris wrote:
Retake from a 750? Are you insane?

Consider this: Last year Stanford dinged every single perfect score applicant that applied. What's the significance? Stanford doesn't care about score. If I were on the panel, I might vote to ding every single one just to make a statement: NO SCORE IS AN AUTOMATIC ADMIT.

If you retake, what message will you be sending admissions committees? You got a 750 first time around, 98% percentile. Meaning that you beat out all but 2% of the entire population ever to take the GMAT ("ever to take" works in theory). The AdCom will see your 750 first time take and then a retake that, if you improve is somewhere between 760 and 800. The 800 of course places you in a group of perfectionist, which would be reinforced by looking at your testing history and the adcoms will see First Attemp: 750, Second Attempt: 800. Schools don't want someone that is perfect, they want people that will be good classmates and strive for perfection while realizing that perfection is rarely achieved. There is always a ROI. You might write a 98% perfect paper and it takes you 6 hours to write it. Then to improve that paper from 98% perfect to 100% perfect takes you another 20 hours. Honestly, is this extra 20 hours worth the 2%? What was the return on your 20 hour investment? 0.1% per hour?

It's your decision, but my advice is to not ever take the GMAT again (as long as you apply within 5 years) because you will be sending the wrong message to the b-school adcoms. That message is that you are more interested in perfection that utility. Schools need someone that can someday go manage a company, not just take tests to perfection. No one gets 100% correct in a business environemnt for which you're being prepared during b-school.


great advice
_________________

GMAT Debrief

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Re: 750 but low quant - retake?   [#permalink] 21 Nov 2009, 22:40
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
12 Experts publish their posts in the topic Retake Advice for low quant 48 with 750 overall MensaNumber 21 07 Mar 2014, 08:41
750 with low quant. Retake? othylon 4 26 Jan 2014, 16:25
750 (47q/46v) - retake because of relatively low quant? ww1010 4 25 Feb 2012, 20:52
Experts publish their posts in the topic Retake? 720 with low quant dwal44 5 29 Oct 2010, 09:02
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic 750 but low quant - retake? kjtk09 25 15 Aug 2009, 16:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

750 but low quant - retake?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 26 posts ] 

Moderators: TGC, m3equals333



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.