Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 25 Aug 2016, 19:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2012
Posts: 129
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 177 [1] , given: 2

A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2012, 15:02
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:38) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 72 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior noticed that dogs who are never physically disciplined (e.g., with a blow from a rolled-up newspaper) never bark at strangers. She concluded that the best way to keep a dog from barking at strange visitors is to not punish the dog physically.

1) The psychologist’s conclusion is based on which of the following assumptions?

A. Striking a dog with a newspaper or other object is an inappropriate method for conditioning canine behavior.
B. Dogs that are never physically disciplined grow up more well-adjusted than dogs that have been subjected to such discipline.
C. There were no instances of an unpunished dog barking at a stranger that had not been observed.
D. Dogs normally bark only at strangers who have previously been physically abortive or threatening.
E. Human children who are physically disciplined are more likely to react negatively to strangers than those who are not.

2)Suppose the psychologist decides to pursue her project further, and she studies 25 dogs that are known to bark at strangers. Which of the following possible findings would undermine her original conclusion?

A. Some of the owners of the dogs studied did not physically punish the dog when it barked at a stranger.
B. Some of the dogs studied were never physically punished.
C. The owners of some of the dogs studied believe that a dog which barks at strangers is a good watchdog.
D. Some of the dogs barked at people who were not stranger s.
E. None of the dogs was disciplined by the method of a rolled-up newspaper.
_________________

Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post

Moderator
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1230
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 110

Kudos [?]: 1254 [1] , given: 116

Re: A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2012, 21:12
1
KUDOS
Answer should be C & B. The conclusion is that unpunished dogs wont bark. B clearly undermines this conclusion.

Also, E is not right because "a rolled up newspaper" was only an example. B takes on a broader scope and hence is a better answer choice. Also E should be "None of the dogs were disciplined by the method of a rolled-up newspaper.".

edit : B & B. WRONGLY READ B as C. Find myself doing that very often. . Hope the same doesn't happen on test day.

Kudos Please... If my post helped
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Last edited by MacFauz on 27 Oct 2012, 02:51, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 647
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 506 [1] , given: 23

Re: A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2012, 22:37
1
KUDOS
kingb wrote:
A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior noticed that dogs who are never physically disciplined (e.g., with a blow from a rolled-up newspaper) never bark at strangers. She concluded that the best way to keep a dog from barking at strange visitors is to not punish the dog physically.

1) The psychologist’s conclusion is based on which of the following assumptions?

A. Striking a dog with a newspaper or other object is an inappropriate method for conditioning canine behavior.
B. Dogs that are never physically disciplined grow up more well-adjusted than dogs that have been subjected to such discipline.
C. There were no instances of an unpunished dog barking at a stranger that had not been observed.
D. Dogs normally bark only at strangers who have previously been physically abortive or threatening.
E. Human children who are physically disciplined are more likely to react negatively to strangers than those who are not.

2)Suppose the psychologist decides to pursue her project further, and she studies 25 dogs that are known to bark at strangers. Which of the following possible findings would undermine her original conclusion?

A. Some of the owners of the dogs studied did not physically punish the dog when it barked at a stranger.
B. Some of the dogs studied were never physically punished.
C. The owners of some of the dogs studied believe that a dog which barks at strangers is a good watchdog.
D. Some of the dogs barked at people who were not stranger s.
E. None of the dogs was disciplined by the method of a rolled-up newspaper.

Notice the conclusion - best way to keep a dog from barking at strange visitors is to not punish the dog physically
There is an underlying assumption in this conclusion that dogs that are never physically disciplined would behave better with strangers than dogs that have been subjected to such discipline.
Only such an assumption would allow author to conclude strongly with 'best way".
statement B states same thing.
Hence Ans B it is.

For second question. again, the statement B undermines the original conclusion. If even 1 dog that was never punished barked at strander then that would mean the original conclusion was flawed.
Hence Ans B it is again.

For both questions, B is the answer.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Lets Kudos!!!
Black Friday Debrief

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 6829
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1922

Kudos [?]: 11931 [1] , given: 221

Re: A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2013, 05:35
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
kingb wrote:
A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior noticed that dogs who are never physically disciplined (e.g., with a blow from a rolled-up newspaper) never bark at strangers. She concluded that the best way to keep a dog from barking at strange visitors is to not punish the dog physically.

1) The psychologist’s conclusion is based on which of the following assumptions?

A. Striking a dog with a newspaper or other object is an inappropriate method for conditioning canine behavior.
B. Dogs that are never physically disciplined grow up more well-adjusted than dogs that have been subjected to such discipline.
C. There were no instances of an unpunished dog barking at a stranger that had not been observed.
D. Dogs normally bark only at strangers who have previously been physically abortive or threatening.
E. Human children who are physically disciplined are more likely to react negatively to strangers than those who are not.

Responding to a pm:

The question is not very GMAT-like.

Premises:
A psychologist noticed that dogs who are never physically disciplined never bark at strangers.

Conclusion: The best way to keep a dog from barking at strange visitors is to not punish the dog physically.

She is assuming that she has observed all cases of dogs who are never physically disciplined. It is a case of inferring a generalization from specific examples. If you study 5 cases and the same thing happens in all 5, it doesn't mean that something else cannot happen in some other case that you haven't observed.
So she is assuming that there were no instances of an unpunished dog barking at a stranger that had not been observed.

If you still have doubt, use assumption negation.

Negating (C): there WERE instances of an unpunished dog barking at a stranger that had not been observed.

Now can you say that the best way to keep a dog from barking at strange visitors is to not punish the dog physically? No. Now the conclusion cannot hold.

_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Intern Joined: 11 Oct 2012 Posts: 47 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 9 Re: A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior [#permalink] ### Show Tags 26 Oct 2012, 11:17 kingb wrote: A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior noticed that dogs who are never physically disciplined (e.g., with a blow from a rolled-up newspaper) never bark at strangers. She concluded that the best way to keep a dog from barking at strange visitors is to not punish the dog physically. 1) The psychologist’s conclusion is based on which of the following assumptions? A. Striking a dog with a newspaper or other object is an inappropriate method for conditioning canine behavior. B. Dogs that are never physically disciplined grow up more well-adjusted than dogs that have been subjected to such discipline. C. There were no instances of an unpunished dog barking at a stranger that had not been observed. D. Dogs normally bark only at strangers who have previously been physically abortive or threatening. E. Human children who are physically disciplined are more likely to react negatively to strangers than those who are not. 2)Suppose the psychologist decides to pursue her project further, and she studies 25 dogs that are known to bark at strangers. Which of the following possible findings would undermine her original conclusion? A. Some of the owners of the dogs studied did not physically punish the dog when it barked at a stranger. B. Some of the dogs studied were never physically punished. C. The owners of some of the dogs studied believe that a dog which barks at strangers is a good watchdog. D. Some of the dogs barked at people who were not stranger s. E. None of the dogs was disciplined by the method of a rolled-up newspaper. C and A IMO. The author is basically saying that because X happened within sample Y, X won't happen elsewhere: a classic flaw in scientific reasoning. C and A are the ones that both address this flaw with the conclusion. Does anyone know what the OA is? _________________ Please give kudos if you found my post useful, I give kudos back Intern Joined: 29 Sep 2012 Posts: 20 Location: United States Concentration: Finance, Strategy WE: Corporate Finance (Investment Banking) Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 68 Re: A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior [#permalink] ### Show Tags 26 Oct 2012, 12:15 kingb wrote: A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior noticed that dogs who are never physically disciplined (e.g., with a blow from a rolled-up newspaper) never bark at strangers. She concluded that the best way to keep a dog from barking at strange visitors is to not punish the dog physically. 1) The psychologist’s conclusion is based on which of the following assumptions? A. Striking a dog with a newspaper or other object is an inappropriate method for conditioning canine behavior. B. Dogs that are never physically disciplined grow up more well-adjusted than dogs that have been subjected to such discipline. C. There were no instances of an unpunished dog barking at a stranger that had not been observed. D. Dogs normally bark only at strangers who have previously been physically abortive or threatening. E. Human children who are physically disciplined are more likely to react negatively to strangers than those who are not. 2)Suppose the psychologist decides to pursue her project further, and she studies 25 dogs that are known to bark at strangers. Which of the following possible findings would undermine her original conclusion? A. Some of the owners of the dogs studied did not physically punish the dog when it barked at a stranger. B. Some of the dogs studied were never physically punished. C. The owners of some of the dogs studied believe that a dog which barks at strangers is a good watchdog. D. Some of the dogs barked at people who were not strangers. E. None of the dogs was disciplined by the method of a rolled-up newspaper. Claims: dogs who are never physically disciplined (e.g., with a blow from a rolled-up newspaper) never bark at strangers Assumption: Since, dogs must bark at strangers in ought to alert the owner. So,What makes a dog bark at strangers? Conclusion: No physical punishment = keep from barking 1) The psychologist’s conclusion is based on which of the following assumptions? A. Striking a dog with a newspaper or other object is an inappropriate method for conditioning canine behavior. Striking itself is a punishment. Negates the conclusion B. Dogs that are never physically disciplined grow up more well-adjusted than dogs that have been subjected to such discipline. Compares dogs with their nature. But,who barks more and who barks less? Out of way C. There were no instances of an unpunished dog barking at a stranger that had not been observed. no instances of unpunished dog barking = there may be instances of punished dog barking (w.r.t author's notice) So assuming that dogs are not punished then they will not bark. Assumption fits D. Dogs normally bark only at strangers who have previously been physically abortive or threatening. Conditional. past doesn't necessarily be same as present E. Human children who are physically disciplined are more likely to react negatively to strangers than those who are not. Human Children? Irrelevant 2)Suppose the psychologist decides to pursue her project further, and she studies 25 dogs that are known to bark at strangers. Which of the following possible findings would undermine her original conclusion? Conclusion: No physical punishment = Keep dogs from barking atstrangers (Study is on dogs that are known to bark. So findings should talk about physical punishment and negate the conclusion) A. Some of the owners of the dogs studied did not physically punish the dog when it barked at a stranger. Statement says (No physical punishment and barked). Talks about Physical punishment but Conditional. Some of the dogs were not physically punished.It means 2 dogs can get the punishment or may be 10 dogs get the punishment. But all dogs are known to bark B. Some of the dogs studied were never physically punished. Statement says Few punished, few are not, but still all the dogs are known to bark. Doesn't support the conclusion C. The owners of some of the dogs studied believe that a dog which barks at strangers is a good watchdog. Irrelevant. Because, it's not about the good dog or bad dog D. Some of the dogs barked at people who were not strangers. Doesn't talk about physical punishment. Conditional. E. None of the dogs was disciplined by the method of a rolled-up newspaper. Talks about the punishment method (from author's example: dogs who are never physically disciplined (e.g., with a blow from a rolled-up newspaper never bark at strangers). None of the dogs was disciplined, but the study is on dogs which are known to bark. This inference violates the conclusion. Answers: C and E _________________ Learn the Values. Knowledge comes by itself. Manager Joined: 06 May 2012 Posts: 77 Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 16 Re: A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior [#permalink] ### Show Tags 27 Oct 2012, 14:00 kingb, can you post OA? I got B & B for both questions. Will explain more if OA is posted. Intern Joined: 29 Sep 2012 Posts: 20 Location: United States Concentration: Finance, Strategy WE: Corporate Finance (Investment Banking) Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 68 Re: A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior [#permalink] ### Show Tags 28 Oct 2012, 20:49 MacFauz wrote: Answer should be C & B. The conclusion is that unpunished dogs wont bark. B clearly undermines this conclusion. Also, E is not right because "a rolled up newspaper" was only an example. B takes on a broader scope and hence is a better answer choice. Also E should be "None of the dogs were disciplined by the method of a rolled-up newspaper.". edit : B & B. WRONGLY READ B as C. Find myself doing that very often. . Hope the same doesn't happen on test day. Kudos Please... If my post helped Thank you for the explanation MacFauz and Vips. _________________ Learn the Values. Knowledge comes by itself. Intern Joined: 27 Aug 2012 Posts: 16 Schools: Anderson '15 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 8 Re: A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior [#permalink] ### Show Tags 01 Nov 2012, 06:27 Got C & B. reading the above posts, am not clear what the actual OA is. Can someone post the OA pls. Q1) Is more confusing. Below line of reasoning for C. Only close contenders are B&C. 1) The psychologist’s conclusion is based on which of the following assumptions? B. Dogs that are never physically disciplined grow up more well-adjusted than dogs that have been subjected to such discipline. -- Quote: Dogs are well adjusted and dogs barking at strangers are close concepts(Dint really say well adjusted to what) but not two same things. So even i negate this option it does not completely kills my conclusion. C. There were no instances of an unpunished dog barking at a stranger that had not been observed. --- Quote: Negating this option kills the conclusion. It attacks on the liability of the data on which the conclusion is based . Kindly point out if any mistakes. Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 6829 Location: Pune, India Followers: 1922 Kudos [?]: 11931 [0], given: 221 Re: A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior [#permalink] ### Show Tags 09 Apr 2013, 05:38 kingb wrote: 2)Suppose the psychologist decides to pursue her project further, and she studies 25 dogs that are known to bark at strangers. Which of the following possible findings would undermine her original conclusion? A. Some of the owners of the dogs studied did not physically punish the dog when it barked at a stranger. B. Some of the dogs studied were never physically punished. C. The owners of some of the dogs studied believe that a dog which barks at strangers is a good watchdog. D. Some of the dogs barked at people who were not stranger s. E. None of the dogs was disciplined by the method of a rolled-up newspaper. The conclusion of her study was: the best way to keep a dog from barking at strange visitors is to not punish the dog physically. If there were cases where the dogs were never physically punished but they barked at strangers, her conclusion would be undermined. Hence answer is (B). Notice that (A) is not the answer since we need to ensure that the dogs were never physically punished, not just when they barked at strangers. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Re: A behavioral psychologist interested in animal behavior   [#permalink] 09 Apr 2013, 05:38
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 In a study of the behavior of adolescents to parental 5 02 Jan 2013, 01:26
1 Because learned patterns of behavior, such as the 15 14 Jul 2010, 13:32
Because learned patterns of behavior, such as the 4 26 Oct 2007, 18:52
Farm animals have certain behavioral tendencies that result 5 23 Mar 2007, 10:57
Animals with a certain behavioral disorder have unusually 9 16 Nov 2006, 04:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by