Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 27 Aug 2014, 07:37

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A certain airport security scanner designed to detect

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 586
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
A certain airport security scanner designed to detect [#permalink] New post 20 Jun 2005, 10:32
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
24. A certain airport security scanner designed to detect explosives in luggage will alert the scanner’s operator whenever the piece of luggage passing under the scanner contains an explosive. The scanner will erroneously alert the operator for only one percent of the pieces of luggage that contain no explosives. Thus in ninety-nine out of a hundred alerts explosives will actually be present.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) ignores the possibility of the scanner’s failing to signal an alert when the luggage does contain an explosive
(B) draws a general conclusion about reliability on the basis of a sample that is likely to be biased
(C) ignores the possibility of human error on the part of the scanner’s operator once the scanner has alerted him or her
(D) fails to acknowledge the possibility that the scanner will not be equally sensitive to all kinds of explosives
(E) substitutes one group for a different group in the statement of a percentage
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1493
Location: Germany
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Jun 2005, 11:54
A)...
_________________

If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Jun 2005, 12:17
A is my answer as well.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 29 Jun 2005, 06:25
i would go in for D.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 355
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jun 2005, 07:16
Wow.. I am gonna digress from the crowd for a change. My answer is E. Here is why

Lets assume for argument's sake that the machine erroneouly alerted the scanner for explosives when there were none present in 10 out of a thousand cases.. or 1% of all bags. if you were to randomly choose a 100 cases, then it is quite possible that three of those 10 cases (where the machine tagged the baggage by mistake) ended up in the set of 100. Thus the conclusion drawn is wrong, and only E points the flaw in the conclusion.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 374
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jun 2005, 07:29
E is my choice. Consider the possibility that a 100,000 bags pass thru the scanner with NONE of them having explosives. The scanner will ring 100 times and be 100% wrong.

A is wrong because it directly contradicts an assertion in the statement.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 284
Location: CA, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jun 2005, 20:07
E for me

'99% being the probablity' does not translate into 99 out of 100.

In fact, 100 is too small a sample pool for the probablity calculation.

For example, I bought 100 lottery tickets and got one big win, that does not
mean my chance of winning big is 1%
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 674
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jun 2005, 21:03
Agree with E
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 489
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2005, 20:19
E baby, its gotta be E // 0.01 -> error with NO explosive , but this doesnt mean that the rest 0.99 will have one, exactly as answer choice E.
  [#permalink] 03 Jul 2005, 20:19
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic A county airport, designed to serve the needs of private air notrandom 4 01 Nov 2013, 22:08
A certain airport security scanner designed to detect angel2009 10 30 Jan 2010, 11:02
airport rao 4 07 Sep 2008, 09:49
A certain Social Security recipient will receive an annual Jamesk486 1 31 May 2007, 08:48
At a certain airport there are 22 aircraft. 5 of the jets Dan 6 15 Sep 2004, 20:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A certain airport security scanner designed to detect

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.