Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Dec 2004, 18:19

3

This post received KUDOS

6

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (02:20) correct
42% (01:41) wrong based on 362 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, so that any number with a total of more than 10 digits before and after the decimal point cannot be displayed accurately. If x and y are positive integers less than 1,000, can the result of dividing x by y be displayed accurately on the calculator?

A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Jul 2011, 14:35

A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, so that any number with a total of more than 10 digits before and after the decimal point cannot be displayed accurately. If x and y are positive integers less than 1,000, can the result of dividing x by y be displayed accurately on the calculator?

(1) 105 < x < 108

(2) 3 < y < 6

Last edited by Bunuel on 11 Jul 2013, 01:17, edited 1 time in total.

statement 2 can have values either 4 or 5... which should generate a terminating decimal, whatever the value of x may be. so sufficient..

statement 1 can have values such as 106, 107... 107 when divided by 3.. will not generate a terminating #. whereas 106 when divided by 2 will generate a terminating #. so not sufficient.

A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, so that any number with a total of more than 10 digits before and after the decimal point cannot be displayed accurately. If x and y are positive integers less than 1,000, can the result of dividing x by y be displayed accurately on the calculator?

(1) 105 < x < 108

(2) 3 < y < 6

From Stmt 1: if x = 106 and y = 2 then x/y can be displayed accurately However, if x = 106 and y = 3 then x/y cannot be displayed accurately

From Stmt 2: possible value of y = 4 and 5. Any number divided by either 4 or 5 will be either an integer or a terminating decimal series. Hence suff. B

Re: A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Feb 2014, 06:16

Hi guys, can any one explain how this question is answered. i understand that anything divided by 4 or 5 will either be a integer or a terminating decimal series, but how does this ensure that the total number of digits will not be more than 10?

Re: A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 May 2014, 09:17

Ans should be B

Statement 1:

don't know about y-------insufficient

Statement 2: 3<y<6 means y could be 4 or 5

now, any three digit number can be written as (100x+10y+z)

as , 100 is divisible by 4 & 5 10 /4=2.5 & 10/5 =2 so we need to check for z.

check for last digit 1/4=0.25 , 2/4=0.5, 3/4 =0.75, 4/4=1, 5/4=1.25 , 6/4=1.5, 7/4= 1.75, 8/4=2, 9/4= 2.25 means Any number less than 1000 when divided by 4 will give at most 3 digits before decimal and 2 digits after decimal, so in total 5 digits.

Re: A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Feb 2016, 21:56

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Apr 2016, 17:02

cpcalanoc wrote:

A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, so that any number with a total of more than 10 digits before and after the decimal point cannot be displayed accurately. If x and y are positive integers less than 1,000, can the result of dividing x by y be displayed accurately on the calculator?

(1) 105 < x < 108

(2) 3 < y < 6

question actually asks: does y have a factor of 2 or 5?

1. nothing about y 2. sufficient. we know that y either has a factor of 2 or 5, so it will be a terminating decimal, and we know for sure that we can represent x/y accurately.

gmatclubot

Re: A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits,
[#permalink]
26 Apr 2016, 17:02

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...