Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 02 Jun 2015, 17:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A certain drug, when taken by patients with high blood

Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 170
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 3

A certain drug, when taken by patients with high blood [#permalink]  26 Jun 2010, 02:34
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

44% (02:34) correct 56% (01:49) wrong based on 147 sessions
A certain drug, when taken by patients with high blood pressure, was found to lower blood pressure to high-normal levels, or from an average of 30 percent to an average of 10 percent above normal. However, a survey of patients with normal blood pressure found that almost 80 percent exercised at least 5 days per week for 30 minutes and maintained a normal blood pressure. Therefore, the drug is not as effective in reducing blood pressure in patients with high blood pressure as is exercise.
The validity of the above conclusion depends on the truth of which of the following?

A. Frequent exercise has the same effect on blood pressure in all patients.
B. No patient with high blood pressure successfully achieved below-normal levels with the drug alone.
C. Patients with normal blood pressure maintained healthy diets for the duration of the study.
D. Few of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly.
E. The drug has little or no effect on patients with normal blood pressure.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 171
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Drug vs Exercise [#permalink]  26 Jun 2010, 04:59
D . Concidering that sample set of people, who generally excercise, consists of some peole who have high blood presure.
_________________

R E S P E C T

Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Posts: 153
Location: I N D I A
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 16

Re: CR: Drug vs Exercise [#permalink]  27 Jun 2010, 23:52
tingle15 wrote:
A certain drug, when taken by patients with high blood pressure, was found to lower blood pressure to high-normal levels, or from an average of 30 percent to an average of 10 percent above normal. However, a survey of patients with normal blood pressure found that almost 80 percent exercised at least 5 days per week for 30 minutes and maintained a normal blood pressure. Therefore, the drug is not as effective in reducing blood pressure in patients with high blood pressure as is exercise.
The validity of the above conclusion depends on the truth of which of the following?

A. Frequent exercise has the same effect on blood pressure in all patients. Exaggerated
B. No patient with high blood pressure successfully achieved below-normal levels with the drug alone.
C. Patients with normal blood pressure maintained healthy diets for the duration of the study.
D. Few of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly.
E. The drug has little or no effect on patients with normal blood pressure.
Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 227
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 3

Re: CR: Drug vs Exercise [#permalink]  28 Jun 2010, 08:17
Answer should be D. But can some one please explain the solution by logically negating the answer choice. I believe the logical negation of the answer choice D will be-

None of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly. I am not sure if this statement is weakening the argument. Thank You.

Thanks,
Akhil M.Parekh
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1473
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 13

Re: CR: Drug vs Exercise [#permalink]  28 Jun 2010, 08:33
in order to conclusively prove that exercise is more effective than the drug in keep bp under check we must create two samples of people - one who exercise and dont take drug and the other who dont exercise but take the drug. Then we should compare their blood pressures. If "normal" people tend to maintain healthy bp with exercise and those who take drug are not able to bring their bp to normal levels - it shows that the drug has failed to be effective.

I chose D purely by elimination because the other choices were making no sense. In fact I believe its a poor quality question because we cannot logically compare healthy people who dont have bp to those who have --- those with BP may or may not respond to exercise in the same way as normal people do (for whom exercise alone may be sufficient to maintain healthy bp).
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 994
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: [color=#0000FF]Chicago Booth Class of 2015 [/color] - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Retail Banking)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 498 [1] , given: 36

Re: CR: Drug vs Exercise [#permalink]  28 Jun 2010, 18:51
1
KUDOS
OA is wrong. I fact i'm sure about it.
However A fixes the argument.
The argument doesn;t talk about the low blood pressure. Choice A means that regardless of the blood pressure, patients can benefit from the exercise.Hence drug is not as effective as the exercise.

D limits the scope of the argument making it untenable.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Current Student
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 228
Schools: Sloan R1, McCombs R1, Ross R1 (w/int), Haas R2, Kellogg R2
WE 1: Product Engineering/Manufacturing
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 26

Re: CR: Drug vs Exercise [#permalink]  28 Jun 2010, 19:09
nusmavrik wrote:
OA is wrong. I fact i'm sure about it.
However A fixes the argument.
The argument doesn;t talk about the low blood pressure. Choice A means that regardless of the blood pressure, patients can benefit from the exercise.Hence drug is not as effective as the exercise.

D limits the scope of the argument making it untenable.

A is too strong to be a correct GMAT answer, IMO.
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 75
Location: Toronto
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 118 [2] , given: 2

Re: CR: Drug vs Exercise [#permalink]  28 Jun 2010, 19:19
2
KUDOS
Hi,

the correct answer is definitely choice D. We can use the Kaplan denial test to prove it. The author concludes that the drug isn't as effective as exercise in treating high blood pressure. Choice D reads:

"FEW of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly"

whose denial is:

"MANY of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly"

in which case the argument falls apart (because even though they exercise their blood pressure didn't go down until they were on the drug.) So, when D is false, the argument can't stand. Thus, the argument depends on choice D.

As another poster pointed out, choice A is extreme for an assumption question. The author's reasoning does not depend on the idea that exercise has the same effect on blood pressure in ALL patients. For example, does he have to assume exercise will have a similar effect in LOW-blood pressure patients? Of course not. Thus, his reasoning does NOT depend on choice A.

Another poster pointed out that the argument uses flawed reasoning in that it illogically compares two different groups. Although that's true, that certainly doesn't mean that it is not a good question. In many arguments, the arguer's reasoning will be flawed.
_________________

Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
http://www.kaptest.com/GMAT

Prepare with Kaplan and save $150 on a course! Kaplan Reviews Director Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing. Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015 Joined: 26 Nov 2009 Posts: 994 Location: Singapore Concentration: General Management, Finance Schools: [color=#0000FF]Chicago Booth Class of 2015 [/color] - Class of 2015 WE: Information Technology (Retail Banking) Followers: 17 Kudos [?]: 498 [0], given: 36 Re: CR: Drug vs Exercise [#permalink] 28 Jun 2010, 20:30 Hi Testluv Thanks. How do you this is assumption question? Sorry I think I missed the type of Q. Can you please elaborate? Here are a few examples of questions that signal an assumption question: Which of the following is an assumption on which this argument depends? The explanation above assumes that...... Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above? The conclusion drawn above is based on the assumption that Testluv wrote: As another poster pointed out, choice A is extreme for an assumption question. _________________ Please press kudos if you like my post. VP Joined: 15 Jul 2004 Posts: 1473 Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX) Followers: 17 Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 13 Re: CR: Drug vs Exercise [#permalink] 28 Jun 2010, 21:21 Testluv wrote: Hi, the correct answer is definitely choice D. We can use the Kaplan denial test to prove it. The author concludes that the drug isn't as effective as exercise in treating high blood pressure. Choice D reads: "FEW of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly" whose denial is: "MANY of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly" in which case the argument falls apart (because even though they exercise their blood pressure didn't go down until they were on the drug.) So, when D is false, the argument can't stand. Thus, the argument depends on choice D. As another poster pointed out, choice A is extreme for an assumption question. The author's reasoning does not depend on the idea that exercise has the same effect on blood pressure in ALL patients. For example, does he have to assume exercise will have a similar effect in LOW-blood pressure patients? Of course not. Thus, his reasoning does NOT depend on choice A. Another poster pointed out that the argument uses flawed reasoning in that it illogically compares two different groups. Although that's true, that certainly doesn't mean that it is not a good question. In many arguments, the arguer's reasoning will be flawed. If the high bp people both use drugs and exercise frequently and lets say that by doing both they were able to keep their bp in check - to which of the two would we attribute this effect to? (to exercise or to drug?) it would still leave open the possibility that it was NOT the exercise but the drug that was keeping the bp normal and hence comparing this set of people with the set that exercises regularly and keeps bp in check would not yield a conclusive result. Besides - what do we mean by saying Exercise is more effective in keeping bp under check? For normal people BP is not an issue to begin with so how can we say that exercise is helping them keep the bp in check? If they had BP to begin with and then they exercised and kept BP in check then we could conclude that exercise is perhaps more effective than the drug is in keeping the BP in check. I am not convinced its a good quality question but anyway... it's not a big deal. Kaplan GMAT Instructor Joined: 21 Jun 2010 Posts: 75 Location: Toronto Followers: 23 Kudos [?]: 118 [2] , given: 2 Re: CR: Drug vs Exercise [#permalink] 28 Jun 2010, 21:42 2 This post received KUDOS Hi, great questions guys! Let's start with nusmavrik's: Quote: Hi Testluv Thanks. How do you this is assumption question? Because the question stem asks for something that the conclusion's validity DEPENDS on. An idea on which a conclusion depends is a necessary assumption. Let me know if you seek further elaboration Here are dwivedys' questions: Quote: If the high bp people both use drugs and exercise frequently and lets say that by doing both they were able to keep their bp in check - to which of the two would we attribute this effect to? (to exercise or to drug?) That would indeed be a conundrum. Fortunately, we don't have to deal with it. The author's evidence already established that this group of high-blood pressure-patients' reduced their blood pressure by taking the drug. Thus, their blood pressure was high UNTIL they took the drug. Now, if we learn that (many of) the high-blood-pressure patients were also regular exercisers (as per the denial of choice D), then we know that this group of patients had high blood pressure even though they are regular exercisers. Basically, we'd have a group of people who exercised regularly and who had high blood pressure who then alleviated their high blood pressure by taking the drug. That seriously damages the author's argument that the drug is not as effective as regular exercise. Quote: what do we mean by saying Exercise is more effective in keeping bp under check? As always, we have to attach a commonsense interpretation given the context of the argument. Look at the first sentence: "a certain drug...was found to lower blood pressure". Thus, the only thing the author could possibly intend to mean when he claims that the drug is "not as effective" as exercise is that exercise is better at lowering blood pressure. Quote: I am not convinced its a good quality question I don't see any design flaws with this question! _________________ Kaplan Teacher in Toronto http://www.kaptest.com/GMAT Prepare with Kaplan and save$150 on a course!

Kaplan Reviews

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1473
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 13

Re: CR: Drug vs Exercise [#permalink]  30 Jun 2010, 09:57
Thanks...

Your explanation does make sense. It just didn't occur to me that way when I read the question first.

Testluv wrote:
Hi,

Quote:
Hi Testluv
Thanks. How do you this is assumption question?

Because the question stem asks for something that the conclusion's validity DEPENDS on. An idea on which a conclusion depends is a necessary assumption. Let me know if you seek further elaboration

Here are dwivedys' questions:

Quote:
If the high bp people both use drugs and exercise frequently and lets say that by doing both they were able to keep their bp in check - to which of the two would we attribute this effect to? (to exercise or to drug?)

That would indeed be a conundrum. Fortunately, we don't have to deal with it. The author's evidence already established that this group of high-blood pressure-patients' reduced their blood pressure by taking the drug. Thus, their blood pressure was high UNTIL they took the drug.

Now, if we learn that (many of) the high-blood-pressure patients were also regular exercisers (as per the denial of choice D), then we know that this group of patients had high blood pressure even though they are regular exercisers. Basically, we'd have a group of people who exercised regularly and who had high blood pressure who then alleviated their high blood pressure by taking the drug. That seriously damages the author's argument that the drug is not as effective as regular exercise.

Quote:
what do we mean by saying Exercise is more effective in keeping bp under check?

As always, we have to attach a commonsense interpretation given the context of the argument. Look at the first sentence: "a certain drug...was found to lower blood pressure". Thus, the only thing the author could possibly intend to mean when he claims that the drug is "not as effective" as exercise is that exercise is better at lowering blood pressure.

Quote:
I am not convinced its a good quality question

I don't see any design flaws with this question!
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4072
Followers: 451

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 0

Re: A certain drug, when taken by patients with high blood [#permalink]  09 Dec 2013, 23:23
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 219
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 115 [0], given: 3

Re: CR: Drug vs Exercise [#permalink]  11 Dec 2013, 04:19
amp0201 wrote:
Answer should be D. But can some one please explain the solution by logically negating the answer choice. I believe the logical negation of the answer choice D will be-

None of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly. I am not sure if this statement is weakening the argument. Thank You.

Thanks,
Akhil M.Parekh

Hey Akhil,
The problem here is more language than anything else.
"Few of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly" would mean that NO ONE exercised.
(A few, on the other hand, means that there were a couple or more individuals that did exercise. )
Therefore on negation the statement would read "ALL/ MOST of the patients with high BP exercise regularly"

Hope that helps,
Ajeeth Peo
_________________

www.gmat.crackverbal.com

Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 726
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.3
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 292 [0], given: 523

Re: A certain drug, when taken by patients with high blood [#permalink]  04 Jun 2014, 08:15
A certain drug, when taken by patients with high blood pressure, was found to lower blood pressure to high-normal levels, or from an average of 30 percent to an average of 10 percent above normal. However, a survey of patients with normal blood pressure found that almost 80 percent exercised at least 5 days per week for 30 minutes and maintained a normal blood pressure. Therefore, the drug is not as effective in reducing blood pressure in patients with high blood pressure as is exercise.
The validity of the above conclusion depends on the truth of which of the following?

Premise 1 : Drug decreased from 30% to 10% above normal.
Premise 2 : 80% exercised frequently and could maintain normal blood pressure.
Conclusion : Exercising is more effective than drug

A. Frequent exercise has the same effect on blood pressure in all patients.
Same effect -> high blood pressure patients can maintain the blood pressure. I presume high remains high - It doesn't make sense and refutes the author's argument.

B. No patient with high blood pressure successfully achieved below-normal levels with the drug alone.
Part of the premise : The patients decreased 30% to 10% - Cannot be the assumption.

C. Patients with normal blood pressure maintained healthy diets for the duration of the study.
- Out of scope

D. Few of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly.
- Negation : Most of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly - Breaks the conclusion

E. The drug has little or no effect on patients with normal blood pressure.
- Out of scope.

Hence D)
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal
Never Give Up !!!

My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961

Intern
Joined: 29 Sep 2012
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: A certain drug, when taken by patients with high blood [#permalink]  05 Oct 2014, 09:16
Hi,

I just gave a test and came across this question. However, the answer choices are slightly different. Here's the question:

A certain drug, when taken by patients with high blood pressures, was found to lower the blood pressure to high-normal levels, or from an average of 30 percent to an average of 10 percent above normal. However a survey of patients with normal blood pressures found that almost 80 percent exercised atleast 5 days per week for 30 minutes and maintained a normal blood pressure.
Therefore, the drug is not as affective in reducing blood pressure in patients with high blood pressure as is exercise. The validity of the above conclusion depends on the truth of which of the following ?

A. None of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly.
B. No patient with high blood pressure successfully achieved below-normal levels with drug alone.
C. Patients with normal blood-pressure maintained healthy diets for the duration of the study.
D. Daily exercise has the same effect on the blood pressures in all patients.
E. The drug has little or no effects on patients with normal blood pressures.

The OA for this is D. However, the original post does not support this OA.

During the test, I had narrowed down to A and D, and I've read some convincing explanations for both, however, I'm still confused between A and D.

Experts- Kindly help me eliminate A and justify D.

Thanks & Regards,
Chandni
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 726
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.3
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 292 [0], given: 523

Re: A certain drug, when taken by patients with high blood [#permalink]  05 Oct 2014, 09:50
Chandni170 wrote:
Hi,

I just gave a test and came across this question. However, the answer choices are slightly different. Here's the question:

A certain drug, when taken by patients with high blood pressures, was found to lower the blood pressure to high-normal levels, or from an average of 30 percent to an average of 10 percent above normal. However a survey of patients with normal blood pressures found that almost 80 percent exercised atleast 5 days per week for 30 minutes and maintained a normal blood pressure.
Therefore, the drug is not as effective in reducing blood pressure in patients with high blood pressure as is exercise. The validity of the above conclusion depends on the truth of which of the following ?

A. None of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly.
B. No patient with high blood pressure successfully achieved below-normal levels with drug alone.
C. Patients with normal blood-pressure maintained healthy diets for the duration of the study.
D. Daily exercise has the same effect on the blood pressures in all patients.
E. The drug has little or no effects on patients with normal blood pressures.

The OA for this is D. However, the original post does not support this OA.

During the test, I had narrowed down to A and D, and I've read some convincing explanations for both, however, I'm still confused between A and D.

Experts- Kindly help me eliminate A and justify D.

Thanks & Regards,
Chandni

I am going to discuss only the two options A and D.

Premise 1: Drugs can reduce blood pressure to some extent and not completely.
Premise 2 : 80% of the patients with normal blood pressure can maintain their blood pressure if they exercise.
Conclusion : Exercise is better than Drugs.

A big leap of faith. Drugs doesn't work on high blood pressure and using exercise the patients with normal blood pressure can maintain their blood pressure.

A. None of the patients with high blood pressure exercise regularly.
This statement isolates the effect to only the drugs and not the to exercise. Still we cannot compare the effects and come to a conclusion.

D. Daily exercise has the same effect on the blood pressures in all patients.
Now, this connects the dots. Daily exercise has the same effects on all patients - Including high blood pressure patients.
So high blood pressure patients can have normal blood pressure if they exercise regularly.
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal
Never Give Up !!!

My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961

Re: A certain drug, when taken by patients with high blood   [#permalink] 05 Oct 2014, 09:50
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A certain drug, when taken by patients with high BP 6 12 Jan 2014, 05:58
9 A study of high blood pressure treatments found that 7 21 Jul 2013, 20:44
High blood pressure in Black people 19 07 Sep 2007, 15:57
The public is well aware that high blood cholesterol levels 3 16 Aug 2005, 13:03
Two alternative drugs are available to prevent blood clots 8 19 Jun 2005, 18:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by