Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A certain movie depicted product A in 21 scenes, product B in 7 scenes [#permalink]
02 May 2011, 18:19

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

86% (01:49) correct
14% (00:57) wrong based on 36 sessions

A certain movie depicted product A in 21 scenes, product B in 7 scenes, product C in 4 scenes, and product D in 3 scenes. The four product manufacturers paid amounts proportional to the number of scenes in which their product was depicted in the movie. If each manufacturer paid x dollars per scene, how much did the manufacturer of product D pay for this advertising?

(1) The manufacturers of product A and B together paid a total of $560,000 for this advertising. (2) The manufacturer of product B paid $60,000 more for this advertising than the manufacturer of product C paid.

Presumably, the equation to find the total amount would be: A + B + C + D = $total

Based on what was provided I decided to pick E because I thought: (1) Only provided the amount that A and B together paid and even if you figure out what A and B individually paid based on that number, you're still missing the total amount paid by ALL product manufacturers (in order to get D's amount). The equation I came up with was A + B = $560,000

(2) Based on that, you can figure out what C would be but none of the other values are given so you still can't get D. The equation I came up with was A + (C + 60,000) + C + D = $?

When you put (1) and (2) together, you can get: 560,000 + (560,000/28)*4 + D = $? but without knowing the total amount, you still can't subtract out D. (Or can you??)

Am I missing something really obvious here...? I don't see how the answer can be D. Thanks

Re: A certain movie depicted product A in 21 scenes, product B in 7 scenes [#permalink]
02 May 2011, 18:30

Not sure where "D" comes from, but I think both scenarios can work.

Essentially it comes down to multiples. The total pot of money is 35x if you add up all the shares. In the first case, 28x potentially equalled $560M >> that can work if x = $20M. In the second case, 7x = 4x + $60M >> that can work too if x = $20M too.

So IMHO both are the same answer. If there's any hole in my reasoning, I welcome comments. As I can benefit from it too (Thanks in advance.) _________________

= = = = = = = = = =

If you liked my post, please consider a Kudos for me. Thanks!

Re: A certain movie depicted product A in 21 scenes, product B in 7 scenes [#permalink]
02 May 2011, 18:34

Ohhh...I got that. I guess what I was thinking though was that each amount was different. Then again, I guess if you read the question very carefully, it does say the amounts are "proportional." I think I was continuing to try to solve it because I thought A was different from B was different from C and so on.

I already came up with $20,000 by working the problem...

Re: A certain movie depicted product A in 21 scenes, product B in 7 scenes [#permalink]
20 Jan 2015, 17:21

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Re: A certain movie depicted product A in 21 scenes, product B in 7 scenes [#permalink]
20 Jan 2015, 19:06

Expert's post

Hi All,

GMAT questions are always carefully worded, so you really have to pay attention to the details (and take the necessary notes) so that you don't miss anything.

In this question, we're told that EACH manufacturer paid X dollars PER SCENE. That is a "fixed" rate that is the same for everyone.

So.... 1 scene = X dollars 2 scenes = 2X dollars 3 scenes = 3X dollars Etc.

We're also told the number of scenes that each manufacturer advertised in (21 for A, 7 for B, 4 for C and 3 for D). The question asks how much was paid by D. From here, the real question is "what is X?" If we know the price per scene, then we can figure out what D paid (3X = the answer). When dealing with the 2 Facts, we're really just doing simple algebra.

Fact 1: A and B paid a total of $560,000

A and B had a combined total of 28 scenes, so...

28X = 560,000 X = 20,000 Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT

Fact 2: B piad $60,000 more than C

7X = 4X + 60,000 3X = 60,000 X = 20,000 Fact 2 is SUFFICIENT

On September 6, 2015, I started my MBA journey at London Business School. I took some pictures on my way from the airport to school, and uploaded them on...

When I was growing up, I read a story about a piccolo player. A master orchestra conductor came to town and he decided to practice with the largest orchestra...

Amy Cuddy, Harvard Business School professor, at TED Not all leadership looks the same; there is no prescribed formula for what makes a good leader. Rudi Gassner believed that...

We are thrilled to welcome the Class of 2017 to campus today, and data from the incoming class of students indicates that Kellogg’s community is about to reach a...