Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 02:59 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 02:59

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Mar 2009
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 272 [171]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618686 [50]
Given Kudos: 81586
Send PM
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1114
Own Kudos [?]: 4702 [20]
Given Kudos: 376
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2011
Status:==GMAT Ninja==
Posts: 149
Own Kudos [?]: 217 [0]
Given Kudos: 46
Schools:ISB, IIMA ,SP Jain , XLRI
 Q48  V24 GMAT 2: 610  Q48  V27
WE 1: Aditya Birla Group (sales)
WE 2: Saint Gobain Group (sales)
Send PM
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
fluke wrote:
Warlock007 wrote:
Dear bunuel
with all respects here is my doubt

here is the method to cross check the answer
in gmat both option do not contradict (i hope i am correct). Yes, that's true.

according to A 3/4th = 96 people attended both session (morning and afternoon both)
and according to B 16 (1/8th) people attended morning session. Morning session ONLY.

now how come both the options are telling different no of people in morning session.
Well!!! Statement 1 is not telling us much about the morning session, except that at least 96 people were there for the morning session. St1 and St2 are telling two different things and both are correct and non-conflicting.

one more thing
what would be the answer if the question were
how many of the people attended the morning session [highlight]only omitted[/highlight]
"C" would be the answer in that case.

PS: had [only] not been in the question no one would have even posted this



Dear Fluke
were "only" not there
then B would have been a straight away answer (why would we need St A)
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Feb 2011
Posts: 309
Own Kudos [?]: 324 [1]
Given Kudos: 42
Send PM
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
M only = M - both ?

1. Not sufficient

both = (3/4)*128 = 96

Total = M + A - both

M-both = 128- A

we still need to know either M or A to find M only.

2. Sufficient

A = (7/8)*128 = 112

Total = M + A - both

=>M-both = Total - A = 128-112 = 16.

Answer is B.
128 =
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2013
Posts: 124
Own Kudos [?]: 180 [0]
Given Kudos: 25
Send PM
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and an afternoon session. If each of the 128 people attending the seminar attended at least one of the two sessions, how many of the people attended the morning session only.

(1) 3/4 of the people attended both sessions
(2) 7/8 of the people attended the after noon session

(1) 3/4 of 128 is 96. So we know that 96 people attended both seminars. If you draw Venn diagram you'll see that 96 is the intersection of the people who attended morning session and the evening session. This only tells that minimum # of people for the morning session is 96. Morning only could be from 0 to 32. Not sufficient.

(2) 7/8 of the people attended the after noon session=112 people. This directly tells that 112 attended after noon session, as each of the 128 people attending the seminar attended at least one of the two sessions hence rest of the people 16, must have been attending the morning session and not attending the evening, which IS only morning session attendant #.

Again on Venn diagram 112 would be: only afternoon + intersection of morning and afternoon, so the third part which is morning only would be: total-(Afternoon and intersection)=128-102=26.

Answer: B.

P.S. You can attach the file directly to the question, so that everyone see it on the page.


Bunuel,
Statement 2 says that 7/8 attended the afternoon session (i.e. 112 ppl). From these, we don't know how many attended afternoon only or morning + afternoon, hence how can we say for sure that 16 attended morning only?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618686 [6]
Given Kudos: 81586
Send PM
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
5
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Skag55 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and an afternoon session. If each of the 128 people attending the seminar attended at least one of the two sessions, how many of the people attended the morning session only.

(1) 3/4 of the people attended both sessions
(2) 7/8 of the people attended the after noon session

(1) 3/4 of 128 is 96. So we know that 96 people attended both seminars. If you draw Venn diagram you'll see that 96 is the intersection of the people who attended morning session and the evening session. This only tells that minimum # of people for the morning session is 96. Morning only could be from 0 to 32. Not sufficient.

(2) 7/8 of the people attended the after noon session=112 people. This directly tells that 112 attended after noon session, as each of the 128 people attending the seminar attended at least one of the two sessions hence rest of the people 16, must have been attending the morning session and not attending the evening, which IS only morning session attendant #.

Again on Venn diagram 112 would be: only afternoon + intersection of morning and afternoon, so the third part which is morning only would be: total-(Afternoon and intersection)=128-102=26.

Answer: B.

P.S. You can attach the file directly to the question, so that everyone see it on the page.


Bunuel,
Statement 2 says that 7/8 attended the afternoon session (i.e. 112 ppl). From these, we don't know how many attended afternoon only or morning + afternoon, hence how can we say for sure that 16 attended morning only?


Consider this: we are asked to find how many of the people attended the morning session only. So, we need to find {Morning} - {Both}. Now:

{Total} = {Morning} + {Afternoon} - {Both};
{128} = {Morning} + 112 - {Both};
{Morning} - {Both} = 16.

Does this make sense?
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2011
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 385 [0]
Given Kudos: 240
Send PM
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
I tried solving this prob. by using double set matrix. Is that a wrong approach for this problem? I got (C) by doing that.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3726
Own Kudos [?]: 16832 [11]
Given Kudos: 165
Send PM
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
9
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
arkle wrote:
I tried solving this prob. by using double set matrix. Is that a wrong approach for this problem? I got (C) by doing that.

Hi arkle,

The question asks us to find the number of people who attended the morning session only i.e. who attended the morning session but did not attend the afternoon session.

Even when using the double set matrix you will get option B as the answer. Please refer the diagram of the matrix below for statement-II:



We are given that 7/8 of the people attended the afternoon session i.e. number of people who attended afternoon session irrespective of whether they attended morning session or not is 112. Since the total number of people who attended the session is 128, we get the number of people who did not attend the afternoon session as 128 - 112 = 16.

As everyone attended at least one session there were 0 number of people who did not attend any of the session. That leaves us with 16 number of people who did not attend the afternoon session but attended only the morning session which is what the question asks us .

Hence st-II is sufficient to answer the question.

Hope this helps :)

Regards
Harsh
VP
VP
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1262
Own Kudos [?]: 201 [0]
Given Kudos: 332
Send PM
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
C-trap problem.

A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and an afternoon session. If each of the 128 people attending the seminar attended at least one of the two sessions, how many of the people attended the morning session only.

(1) 3/4 of the people attended both sessions
3/4 x 128 = 96 attended both but we don't know how many attended the morning session but NOT the afternoon session as well.
Insufficient

(2) 7/8 of the people attended the afternoon session
7/8 x 128 = 128
This tells us that the number of people who DID NOT attend the afternoon session is 16.

Sufficient.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Posts: 5957
Own Kudos [?]: 13386 [0]
Given Kudos: 124
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
Expert Reply
adarsh12345 wrote:
A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and an afternoon session. If each of the 128 people attending the seminar attended at least one of the two sessions, how many of the people attended the morning session only.

(1) 3/4 of the people attended both sessions
(2) 7/8 of the people attended the afternoon session


Answer: Option B

Video solution by GMATinsight



Get TOPICWISE: Concept Videos | Practice Qns 100+ | Official Qns 50+ | 100% Video solution CLICK HERE.
Two MUST join YouTube channels : GMATinsight (1000+ FREE Videos) and GMATclub :)
VP
VP
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 1375
Own Kudos [?]: 207 [0]
Given Kudos: 189
Send PM
A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
Hi avigutman - my question is on the MECE groups in this question.

I eventually got the table right, which is below

Attachment:
screenshot 6.jpg
screenshot 6.jpg [ 17.62 KiB | Viewed 10060 times ]


My question is the following however :

a) would you agree - morning and afternoon are MECE groups ?

What I mean is -- I thought the grouping instead was this instead
Attachment:
screenshot 9.jpg
screenshot 9.jpg [ 17.18 KiB | Viewed 10066 times ]


I know that my 2nd table is NOT RIGHT but my question still stands :

-- Afternoon and Morning can be MECE groups, can they not ?
--
Tutor
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Posts: 1304
Own Kudos [?]: 2285 [0]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Send PM
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
Expert Reply
jabhatta2 wrote:
-- Afternoon and Morning can be MECE groups, can they not ?
--

Sure, jabhatta2. If you know that it’s impossible to attend both morning AND afternoon sessions, and if you know that everyone did attend one of them, then by definition they are MECE. If at least one of those conditions is false, then they’re not MECE.

Posted from my mobile device
VP
VP
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 1375
Own Kudos [?]: 207 [0]
Given Kudos: 189
Send PM
A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
Thanks so Much avigutman ! I think you are saying – my 2nd table above is possible.

Attached is an example of my 2nd table with morning/afternoon vs with boys/girls

Attachment:
screenshot 10 .jpg
screenshot 10 .jpg [ 19.65 KiB | Viewed 9984 times ]


avigutman wrote:
jabhatta2 wrote:
-- Afternoon and Morning can be MECE groups, can they not ?
--

Sure, jabhatta2. If you know that it’s impossible to attend both morning AND afternoon sessions, and if you know that everyone did attend one of them, then by definition they are MECE. If at least one of those conditions is false, then they’re not MECE.


Regarding the yellow – I think you are referring to morning/afternoon specifically in my 2nd table above

Everyone attends either morning/afternoon
Its impossible to attend BOTH morning/afternoon

Both of these are true in regards to table 2 specifically (where morning /afternoon are on the vertical line)

I ask because in the original question -- you can attend morning and afternoon AT the same time.
Tutor
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Posts: 1304
Own Kudos [?]: 2285 [0]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Send PM
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
Expert Reply
jabhatta2 wrote:
I ask because in the original question -- you can attend morning and afternoon AT the same time.

Right, jabhatta2, so in the original question morning and afternoon are not MECE.

Posted from my mobile device
VP
VP
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 1375
Own Kudos [?]: 207 [0]
Given Kudos: 189
Send PM
A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
avigutman wrote:
jabhatta2 wrote:
I ask because in the original question -- you can attend morning and afternoon AT the same time.

Right, jabhatta2, so in the original question morning and afternoon are not MECE.

Posted from my mobile device


thanks so much avigutman - interesting

afternoon/morning can be MECE / may not be MECE (Depending on the question)

girls/boys I think will always be MECE
Tutor
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Posts: 1304
Own Kudos [?]: 2285 [0]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Send PM
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
Expert Reply
jabhatta2 wrote:
girls/boys I think will always be MECE

That's way too politically charged for me to weigh in on, jabhatta2.
VP
VP
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 1375
Own Kudos [?]: 207 [0]
Given Kudos: 189
Send PM
A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
avigutman wrote:
jabhatta2 wrote:
girls/boys I think will always be MECE

That's way too politically charged for me to weigh in on, jabhatta2.


Hi avigutman - should have clarified.

I meant in the context of the GMAT - girls/boys are always MECE (in the context of the GMAT)

Obviously, based in Canada - that is not the case.
Tutor
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Posts: 1304
Own Kudos [?]: 2285 [0]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Send PM
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
Expert Reply
jabhatta2 wrote:
I meant in the context of the GMAT - girls/boys are always MECE (in the context of the GMAT)

jabhatta2 Any published official GMAC problems that mention boys and girls do require that we assume that those categories are MECE, yes.
However, I recall hearing around 5 years ago that current and future questions on the test will no longer require that assumption.
So I don't think we'll face that issue going forward. They'll probably just avoid using gender as a category for overlapping sets questions.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32643
Own Kudos [?]: 821 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A certain one-day seminar consisted of a morning session and [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92901 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne