Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, [#permalink]
03 Nov 2007, 04:26

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, $35, $40, $45 and $70, respectively. On a given day, the price of one stock increased by 15%, while the price of another decreased by 35% and the prices of the remaining three remained constant. If the average price of a stock in the portfolio rose by approximately 2%, which of the following could be the prices of the shares that remained constant?

A) 20, 35, 70

B) 20, 45, 70

C) 20, 35, 40

D) 35, 40, 70

E) 35, 40, 45

The technique I'm using is not giving the correct answer; the technique that is giving the correct answer, I do not understand. Please show your work and explain your answer.

1. Find what is 2% increase in $ for an average stock (for all stocks).

2. (20+35+40+45+70)*0.02 = 4.2$

3. Now we get the greatest diff when there is 15% increase on 70 and 35% decrease on 20 which is 10.5 - 7 = 3.5. For all other options it will be less then 3.5.

5. The only two stocks that can give you the closest solution for x,y are 70 and 20.

the answer is (E)

KS: Here's where I'm having trouble. The stem states that 'the average price of a stock in the portfolio rose by approximately 2%'. So why are you multiplying the sum (210) by .02 and not the average (210/5=42) by .02?

5. The only two stocks that can give you the closest solution for x,y are 70 and 20.

the answer is (E)

KS: Here's where I'm having trouble. The stem states that 'the average price of a stock in the portfolio rose by approximately 2%'. So why are you multiplying the sum (210) by .02 and not the average (210/5=42) by .02?

Thanks.

let me handle this KS:

The orignal average comes out to be 42 as u know.
Now 2% of 42 = 0.84
So the total average is now 42.84
When we multiply the average (42.84) by 5 we get 214.2
which is 4.2 more then the orignal total (210)

5. The only two stocks that can give you the closest solution for x,y are 70 and 20.

the answer is (E)

KS: Here's where I'm having trouble. The stem states that 'the average price of a stock in the portfolio rose by approximately 2%'. So why are you multiplying the sum (210) by .02 and not the average (210/5=42) by .02?

Thanks.

It's the same thing, but its easier to work with the sum rather then the average.

assume three stocks (10, 20, 30) ---> 30 decreased by 50%

sum = 60 ---> average = 20 ---> 2% sum = 0.12 ---> 2% average = 0.04 (i.e. 0.12/3)

after 50% decrease

sum = 45 ---> average = 15 ---> 2% sum = 0.09 ---> 2% average = 0.03 (0.09/3)

5. The only two stocks that can give you the closest solution for x,y are 70 and 20.

the answer is (E)

KS: Here's where I'm having trouble. The stem states that 'the average price of a stock in the portfolio rose by approximately 2%'. So why are you multiplying the sum (210) by .02 and not the average (210/5=42) by .02?

Thanks.

let me handle this KS:

The orignal average comes out to be 42 as u know. Now 2% of 42 = 0.84 So the total average is now 42.84 When we multiply the average (42.84) by 5 we get 214.2 which is 4.2 more then the orignal total (210)