Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, [#permalink]
19 Jul 2008, 23:15

5

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

67% (03:30) correct
33% (02:40) wrong based on 60 sessions

A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, $35, $40, $45 and $70, respectively. On a given day, the price of one stock increased by 15%, while the price of another decreased by 35% and the prices of the remaining three remained constant. If the average price of a stock in the portfolio rose by approximately 2%, which of the following could be the prices of the shares that remained constant?

A. 20, 35, 70 B. 20, 45, 70 C. 20, 35, 40 D. 35, 40, 70 E. 35, 40, 45

Re: A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, [#permalink]
21 Jul 2008, 05:05

generally we start with the midlle terms and then you move on one side......But depends upon the experience that one selects the limits.....POE _________________

Re: A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, [#permalink]
21 Jul 2008, 14:09

bigfernhead wrote:

How did you know which price to increase and decrease?

Is it by process of elimination (trying each one by one), or is there a quicker method.

I decreased the minimum and increased the maximum, therefore the gap I got is the biggest we can get. And it is still not sufficient to reach the 2% mark : so this is the answer.

A more general method if you do not see it from the begining is as follow :

- compute 2% of the total (here 210*2% = 4.2)

- write down the five numbers and compute for each one what it means to increase it by 15% or decrease it by 35%

A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, [#permalink]
04 Dec 2008, 17:25

4

This post was BOOKMARKED

A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, $35, $40, $45 and $70, respectively. On a given day, the price of one stock increased by 15%, while the price of another decreased by 35% and the prices of the remaining three remained constant. If the average price of a stock in the portfolio rose by approximately 2%, which of the following could be the prices of the shares that remained constant?

A. 20, 35, 70 B. 20, 45, 70 C. 20, 35, 40 D. 35, 40, 70 E. 35, 40, 45

Re: Statistics: % and logic [#permalink]
04 Dec 2008, 22:07

1

This post received KUDOS

snaps wrote:

A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, $35, $40, $45 and $70, respectively. On a given day, the price of one stock increased by 15%, while the price of another decreased by 35% and the prices of the remaining three remained constant. If the average price of a stock in the portfolio rose by approximately 2%, which of the following could be the prices of the shares that remained constant?

A) 20, 35, 70 B) 20, 45, 70 C) 20, 35, 40 D) 35, 40, 70 E) 35, 40, 45

E) 35, 40, 45

It has to be E cuz the 2% of of the portfolio is approx 4.00 and the diff between 15% of 70 and 35% of 20 = 3.50. so this is the most closest. _________________

Re: Statistics: % and logic [#permalink]
18 Jul 2011, 03:39

is there any other method to do this except to try 35% of atleast 2-3 values and 15% of 2-3 values before guessing the answer? If there is, pls share. Thanks.

Re: Statistics: % and logic [#permalink]
18 Jul 2011, 20:49

16

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

snaps wrote:

A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, $35, $40, $45 and $70, respectively. On a given day, the price of one stock increased by 15%, while the price of another decreased by 35% and the prices of the remaining three remained constant. If the average price of a stock in the portfolio rose by approximately 2%, which of the following could be the prices of the shares that remained constant?

A) 20, 35, 70

B) 20, 45, 70

C) 20, 35, 40

D) 35, 40, 70

E) 35, 40, 45

Use logic and the calculations involved will be negligible. Since we have been given that there is an overall increase, the increase should be greater than the decrease. So 15% of A > 35% of B

Now think that 15% of A will be equal to 30% of B if A is twice of B. But 15% of A is greater than 30% of B so A must be greater than twice of B. In fact 15% of A is greater than 35% of B so A must be substantially greater than twice of B. So B has to be 20 because we have values more than twice of 20 (which are 45 and 70). We don't have any values which are more than twice of any other given number (30, 35, 40, 70).

A can be 45 or 70. I would bet on 70 since A has be substantially greater than twice of 20. Even if I want to confirm, 10% of 20 is 2 so 30% of 20 is 6. 5% of 20 is 1 so 35% of 20 is 7. 15% of A has to be greater than 7. Only 70 satisfies this since 10% of 70 is 7. _________________

Re: A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, [#permalink]
03 Dec 2013, 01:50

snaps wrote:

A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, $35, $40, $45 and $70, respectively. On a given day, the price of one stock increased by 15%, while the price of another decreased by 35% and the prices of the remaining three remained constant. If the average price of a stock in the portfolio rose by approximately 2%, which of the following could be the prices of the shares that remained constant?

A. 20, 35, 70 B. 20, 45, 70 C. 20, 35, 40 D. 35, 40, 70 E. 35, 40, 45

Sum of price of all stocks : $ 210 Avg price : $ 42

The average price of the stock goes up by 2% of Avg stock price which is $ 0.84-------> This indicates the total increase in the sum is 0.84*5 = $ + 4.20

from the Q we can say that since the avg stock price has gone up therefore 0.15A - 0.35B >0. A has to be greater than B and thus we have

or 0.15A- 0.35B ~ 4.2$ Now 35% of 20 = 7 and 15% of 70 = 10.5 Diff : 3.5 0.15*35 = ~ 5.25 and 15 % of 70 =10.5 Diff: ~ 5 0.15*35= 5.25. and 15% of 45 = 6.75, Diff~ 1.5

For any other combination ex B = 35 and 0.35 B = 12.25 and A =0.15*70 = 10.5 and the difference between A and B is negative and as B increase the the difference of A and B will become more negative.

Hence Ans option E. The values which are constant

_________________

“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

Re: A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, [#permalink]
24 Mar 2014, 03:53

snaps wrote:

A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, $35, $40, $45 and $70, respectively. On a given day, the price of one stock increased by 15%, while the price of another decreased by 35% and the prices of the remaining three remained constant. If the average price of a stock in the portfolio rose by approximately 2%, which of the following could be the prices of the shares that remained constant?

A. 20, 35, 70 B. 20, 45, 70 C. 20, 35, 40 D. 35, 40, 70 E. 35, 40, 45

Average is 42 2%= .8 (App) Total in Increase in the portfolio is 4 ( As each stock increases by 0.8 => 5 x 0.8)

Difference between the varying stock prices should be 4

Lets take the first and the most conservative case: 22 decreases by 35% = 7.7 A corresponding increase in a stock price of approx 11 is required to bring the difference in stock prices to 4 We can quickly conclude that 70 ( 7 x 15= 10.5) is as good as it gets...coz any stock other than 22 will have an even greater numerical decrease with a 35% decline in its value and has no share that can maintain the difference of 4 ...as we have already taken the highest increase of 15% in 70 _________________

Appreciate the efforts...KUDOS for all Don't let an extra chromosome get you down..

Re: A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, [#permalink]
01 May 2014, 07:18

sayansarkar wrote:

@jlgdr: you mean 15x-35y>0

hence (x/y)>(7/3) when you put x = 70 and y = 20 this equation is satisfied. here x/y is 7/2 > 7/3

Not so. Its supposed to be 37y by concept of differentials. See if price of total average rose by 2% and the price of one of the components declined by 35% then the difference is -35--2 = 35+2 = 37

Re: A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, [#permalink]
26 Jul 2014, 19:35

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Type of Visa: You will be applying for a Non-Immigrant F-1 (Student) US Visa. Applying for a Visa: Create an account on: https://cgifederal.secure.force.com/?language=Englishcountry=India Complete...

I started running back in 2005. I finally conquered what seemed impossible. Not sure when I would be able to do full marathon, but this will do for now...