Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]
24 Jan 2012, 23:22
13
This post received KUDOS
25
This post was BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
95% (hard)
Question Stats:
24% (02:20) correct
76% (01:44) wrong based on 860 sessions
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?
(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year.
(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year.
Re: DS - Percentage [#permalink]
25 Jan 2012, 02:10
12
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
8
This post was BOOKMARKED
devinawilliam83 wrote:
Why is the answer to this A and not D?
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?
Given: {Income}={salary}+{commission}. Question basically asks: is {salary}>{commission}?
(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year --> 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission} --> {salary}=2{commission} --> {salary}>{commission}. Sufficient.
(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year --> |{salary}-{commission}|=0.5{salary}, notice that {salary}-{commission} is in absolute value sign ||, meaning that we can have two cases:
A. {salary}-{commission}=0.5{salary} --> 0.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}>{commission}, thus the answer would be YES; Or: A. {commission}-{salary}=0.5{salary} --> 1.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}<{commission}, thus the answer would be No. Not sufficient.
Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]
21 Jun 2012, 03:04
6
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
jaswinder46 wrote:
please explain why salary - commission is in absoulute value sign?
Because if {salary}>{commission} then {salary}-{commission}=0.5{salary}, since 0.5{salary}>0.
But if {salary}<{commission} then {commission}-{salary}=0.5{salary}.
So, the second statement, which says that "the difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year" should be expressed as |{salary}-{commission}|=0.5{salary}. _________________
Re: DS - Percentage [#permalink]
14 Jun 2013, 03:14
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
Bunuel wrote:
devinawilliam83 wrote:
Why is the answer to this A and not D?
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?
Given: {Income}={salary}+{commission}. Question basically asks: is {salary}>{commission}?
(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year --> 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission} --> {salary}=2{commission} --> {salary}>{commission}. Sufficient.
(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year --> |{salary}-{commission}|=0.5{salary}, notice that {salary}-{commission} is in absolute value sign ||, meaning that we can have two cases:
A. {salary}-{commission}=0.5{salary} --> 0.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}>{commission}, thus the answer would be YES; Or: A. {commission}-{salary}=0.5{salary} --> 1.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}<{commission}, thus the answer would be No. Not sufficient.
Answer: A.
Hope it's clear.
Hi Bunnel, If i do assume that C>S, this will contradict information given in A.
Re: DS - Percentage [#permalink]
14 Jun 2013, 03:16
Expert's post
cumulonimbus wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
devinawilliam83 wrote:
Why is the answer to this A and not D?
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?
Given: {Income}={salary}+{commission}. Question basically asks: is {salary}>{commission}?
(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year --> 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission} --> {salary}=2{commission} --> {salary}>{commission}. Sufficient.
(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year --> |{salary}-{commission}|=0.5{salary}, notice that {salary}-{commission} is in absolute value sign ||, meaning that we can have two cases:
A. {salary}-{commission}=0.5{salary} --> 0.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}>{commission}, thus the answer would be YES; Or: A. {commission}-{salary}=0.5{salary} --> 1.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}<{commission}, thus the answer would be No. Not sufficient.
Answer: A.
Hope it's clear.
Hi Bunnel, If i do assume that C>S, this will contradict information given in A.
Is this an Official question?
What do you mean by official question? Check the tags. It's MGMAT. _________________
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base s [#permalink]
17 Aug 2013, 02:16
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Was the salesman's commission larger than his base salary last year?
(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's total income (salary plus commission) would have been 10 percent higher last year.
(2) The absolute difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year. _________________
Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base s [#permalink]
17 Aug 2013, 02:19
Expert's post
Stiv wrote:
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Was the salesman's commission larger than his base salary last year?
(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's total income (salary plus commission) would have been 10 percent higher last year.
(2) The absolute difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year.
Re: DS - Percentage [#permalink]
17 Aug 2013, 10:01
Bunuel wrote:
devinawilliam83 wrote:
Why is the answer to this A and not D?
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?
Given: {Income}={salary}+{commission}. Question basically asks: is {salary}>{commission}?
(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year --> 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission} --> {salary}=2{commission} --> {salary}>{commission}. Sufficient.
I don't know how answer choice A can be sufficient. See example below.
Using your statement: 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission}
1.1 s + 1.1 c = s + 1.3 c ; for sake of simplicity, let's say that salary = 100 and commission = 100
1.1 (100) + 1.1 (100) = 100 + 1.3 (100)
110 + 110 = 100 + 130
220 < 230 ; Insufficient
^^ I'm confused, do we have to take a salary that's greater than commission to solve the question "Is salary > commission?"
Another way I thought of it was...
If instead of plugging in values, is you decide isolate salary (s) and commission (c) using your formula in bold, it would be:
.10 s = .02 c
In this case, for all positive values where salary > commission, it holds true. Sufficient.
Can someone please help explain how Bunuel got salary = 2 commission? What am I doing wrong above? Am I missing something?
~ Im2bz2p345
Last edited by Im2bz2p345 on 17 Aug 2013, 10:16, edited 2 times in total.
Re: DS - Percentage [#permalink]
17 Aug 2013, 10:09
Im2bz2p345 wrote:
Using your statement: 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission}
1.1 s + 1.1 c = s + 1.3 c ; for sake of simplicity, let's say that salary = 100 and commission = 100
1.1 (100) + 1.1 (100) = 100 + 1.3 (100)
110 + 110 = 100 + 130
220 < 230
If instead of plugging in values, you decide isolate salary (s) and commission (c) using your formula, it would be:
.10 s = .02 c
In this case, for all positive values salary > commission.
Can someone please help explain how Bunuel got salary = 2 commission? What am I doing wrong above? Am I missing something?
~ Im2bz2p345
hi,
the above highlited part is wrong. in that you are assuming salary = comission = 100 if both are equal how can you compare which one is bigger.
let say salary = \(s\) comission =\(c\)
\(1.1(s + c) = s + 1.3 c\) \(1.1s + 1.1c = s + 1.3 c\) taking s items one side and c item one side \(0.1s = 0.2c\) ok now multiply both sides with 10 \(s = 2c\)
hope its clear now _________________
When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....
Re: DS - Percentage [#permalink]
17 Aug 2013, 10:17
blueseas wrote:
Im2bz2p345 wrote:
Using your statement: 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission}
1.1 s + 1.1 c = s + 1.3 c ; for sake of simplicity, let's say that salary = 100 and commission = 100
1.1 (100) + 1.1 (100) = 100 + 1.3 (100)
110 + 110 = 100 + 130
220 < 230
If instead of plugging in values, you decide isolate salary (s) and commission (c) using your formula, it would be:
.10 s = .02 c
In this case, for all positive values salary > commission.
Can someone please help explain how Bunuel got salary = 2 commission? What am I doing wrong above? Am I missing something?
~ Im2bz2p345
hi,
the above highlited part is wrong. in that you are assuming salary = comission = 100 if both are equal how can you compare which one is bigger.
let say salary = \(s\) comission =\(c\)
\(1.1(s + c) = s + 1.3 c\) \(1.1s + 1.1c = s + 1.3 c\) taking s items one side and c item one side \(0.1s = 0.2c\) ok now multiply both sides with 10 \(s = 2c\)
hope its clear now
Thank you blueseas! I missed that last step of multiplying both sides by 10, shoot - should have realized it before I posted.
Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]
19 Aug 2014, 01:25
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________
Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]
16 Feb 2015, 10:39
Bunuel wrote:
devinawilliam83 wrote:
Why is the answer to this A and not D?
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?
Given: {Income}={salary}+{commission}. Question basically asks: is {salary}>{commission}?
(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year --> 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission} --> {salary}=2{commission} --> {salary}>{commission}. Sufficient.
(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year --> |{salary}-{commission}|=0.5{salary}, notice that {salary}-{commission} is in absolute value sign ||, meaning that we can have two cases:
A. {salary}-{commission}=0.5{salary} --> 0.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}>{commission}, thus the answer would be YES; Or: A. {commission}-{salary}=0.5{salary} --> 1.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}<{commission}, thus the answer would be No. Not sufficient.
Answer: A.
Hope it's clear.
Dear Bunuel,
I'm not sure if you need to consider two cases here based on the question's second statement. It is like stating " if the difference between A and B is 4, I would consider A-B = 4 and not |A-B| =4.
The similar question, which you used to merge the topic clearly specifies that the absolute difference between the base salary and the commission is..., there I can understand the two cases but not for the question above, where it does not state anything about the absolute difference.
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]
16 Feb 2015, 12:48
My 2 cents from question stem: commission + base = 1
for statement 1, -> 1.3base + commission = 1.1 plus 1base + commission = 1 -> 0.3 base = 0.1 -> base = 33% -> sufficient
for statement 2, -> base - commission = 0.5base or -> commission - base = 0.5base -> base is equal 50% or 33% -> not greater than 50% -> not suffificent
-> Correct Answer is A
JMO, please correct me if there is any logical flaw. Thanks very much!
Last edited by cherryli2015 on 16 Feb 2015, 18:37, edited 1 time in total.
Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]
16 Feb 2015, 17:30
Expert's post
Hi santorasantu,
The prompt never stated whether the base salary was larger than the commission or the commission was larger than the base salary, so we CANNOT assume that the base salary is bigger just because it was mentioned first in the sentence. The word "difference" implies that one of them IS bigger, but we don't know which one. THAT is why Bunuel addressed it.
Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]
31 Jul 2015, 16:38
For statement 1, why can we assume that the base salary stays the same? i.e no percent change associated with base salary. If only the commission had been 30% higher, then the answer would be A, but what if the base salary could be, for example, 20% lower? Wouldn't the answer then be E?
Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]
01 Aug 2015, 10:34
1
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
Hi stopchange,
The specific question that is asked refers to a base salary and a commission LAST YEAR, so we're dealing with 2 unknowns, NOT 2 variables. This means that the two numbers are constants, but we do NOT know what they are (and thus, we don't know which one is bigger).
Fact 1 uses a 'hypothetical' that points out that increasing JUST the commission (by 30%) would have led to an increase in income (of 10%). By extension, this assumes that the other pieces (in this case, the base salary) stay the same.
As I’m halfway through my second year now, graduation is now rapidly approaching. I’ve neglected this blog in the last year, mainly because I felt I didn’...
Perhaps known best for its men’s basketball team – winners of five national championships, including last year’s – Duke University is also home to an elite full-time MBA...
Hilary Term has only started and we can feel the heat already. The two weeks have been packed with activities and submissions, giving a peek into what will follow...