A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base : GMAT Data Sufficiency (DS)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 08:32

# Jan 16th:

All GMAT Club CATs and Quizzes are Open Free for 24 hrs. See our Holiday Policy to learn more

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 193
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Operations (Insurance)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 291 [11] , given: 11

A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2012, 23:22
11
KUDOS
41
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

25% (02:17) correct 75% (01:42) wrong based on 1123 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year.

(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36511
Followers: 7064

Kudos [?]: 92883 [12] , given: 10528

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2012, 02:10
12
KUDOS
Expert's post
18
This post was
BOOKMARKED
devinawilliam83 wrote:
Why is the answer to this A and not D?

A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?

Given: {Income}={salary}+{commission}. Question basically asks: is {salary}>{commission}?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year --> 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission} --> {salary}=2{commission} --> {salary}>{commission}. Sufficient.

(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year --> |{salary}-{commission}|=0.5{salary}, notice that {salary}-{commission} is in absolute value sign ||, meaning that we can have two cases:

A. {salary}-{commission}=0.5{salary} --> 0.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}>{commission}, thus the answer would be YES;
Or:
A. {commission}-{salary}=0.5{salary} --> 1.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}<{commission}, thus the answer would be No.
Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 18 May 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2012, 02:54
please explain why salary - commission is in absoulute value sign?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36511
Followers: 7064

Kudos [?]: 92883 [6] , given: 10528

Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2012, 03:04
6
KUDOS
Expert's post
jaswinder46 wrote:
please explain why salary - commission is in absoulute value sign?

Because if {salary}>{commission} then {salary}-{commission}=0.5{salary}, since 0.5{salary}>0.

But if {salary}<{commission} then {commission}-{salary}=0.5{salary}.

So, the second statement, which says that "the difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year" should be expressed as |{salary}-{commission}|=0.5{salary}.
_________________
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36511
Followers: 7064

Kudos [?]: 92883 [0], given: 10528

Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2013, 02:52
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Bumping for review and further discussion*. Get a kudos point for an alternative solution!

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE

Theory on Percent and Interest Problems: math-number-theory-percents-91708.html

All DS Percent and Interest Problems to practice: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=33
All PS Percent and Interest Problems to practice: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=54

_________________
Manager
Joined: 14 Nov 2011
Posts: 149
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.61
WE: Consulting (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 103

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2013, 03:14
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Bunuel wrote:
devinawilliam83 wrote:
Why is the answer to this A and not D?

A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?

Given: {Income}={salary}+{commission}. Question basically asks: is {salary}>{commission}?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year --> 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission} --> {salary}=2{commission} --> {salary}>{commission}. Sufficient.

(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year --> |{salary}-{commission}|=0.5{salary}, notice that {salary}-{commission} is in absolute value sign ||, meaning that we can have two cases:

A. {salary}-{commission}=0.5{salary} --> 0.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}>{commission}, thus the answer would be YES;
Or:
A. {commission}-{salary}=0.5{salary} --> 1.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}<{commission}, thus the answer would be No.
Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunnel,
If i do assume that C>S, this will contradict information given in A.

Is this an Official question?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36511
Followers: 7064

Kudos [?]: 92883 [0], given: 10528

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2013, 03:16
cumulonimbus wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
devinawilliam83 wrote:
Why is the answer to this A and not D?

A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?

Given: {Income}={salary}+{commission}. Question basically asks: is {salary}>{commission}?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year --> 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission} --> {salary}=2{commission} --> {salary}>{commission}. Sufficient.

(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year --> |{salary}-{commission}|=0.5{salary}, notice that {salary}-{commission} is in absolute value sign ||, meaning that we can have two cases:

A. {salary}-{commission}=0.5{salary} --> 0.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}>{commission}, thus the answer would be YES;
Or:
A. {commission}-{salary}=0.5{salary} --> 1.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}<{commission}, thus the answer would be No.
Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunnel,
If i do assume that C>S, this will contradict information given in A.

Is this an Official question?

What do you mean by official question? Check the tags. It's MGMAT.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2012
Posts: 237
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 285 [0], given: 121

A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2013, 02:16
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Was the salesman's commission larger than his base salary last year?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's total income (salary plus commission) would have been 10 percent higher last year.

(2) The absolute difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year.
_________________

Kudos if you like the post!

Failing to plan is planning to fail.

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36511
Followers: 7064

Kudos [?]: 92883 [0], given: 10528

Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2013, 02:19
Stiv wrote:
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Was the salesman's commission larger than his base salary last year?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's total income (salary plus commission) would have been 10 percent higher last year.

(2) The absolute difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year.

Merging similar topics.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2012
Posts: 237
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 285 [0], given: 121

Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2013, 02:24
Where could I find more of these kind of questions?
_________________

Kudos if you like the post!

Failing to plan is planning to fail.

Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2012
Posts: 237
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 285 [0], given: 121

Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2013, 06:36
Could this question be solved by picking numbers?
_________________

Kudos if you like the post!

Failing to plan is planning to fail.

Intern
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 30
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2013, 10:01
Bunuel wrote:
devinawilliam83 wrote:
Why is the answer to this A and not D?

A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?

Given: {Income}={salary}+{commission}. Question basically asks: is {salary}>{commission}?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year --> 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission} --> {salary}=2{commission} --> {salary}>{commission}. Sufficient.

I don't know how answer choice A can be sufficient. See example below.

1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission}

1.1 s + 1.1 c = s + 1.3 c ; for sake of simplicity, let's say that salary = 100 and commission = 100

1.1 (100) + 1.1 (100) = 100 + 1.3 (100)

110 + 110 = 100 + 130

220 < 230 ; Insufficient

^^ I'm confused, do we have to take a salary that's greater than commission to solve the question "Is salary > commission?"

Another way I thought of it was...

If instead of plugging in values, is you decide isolate salary (s) and commission (c) using your formula in bold, it would be:

.10 s = .02 c

In this case, for all positive values where salary > commission, it holds true. Sufficient.

Can someone please help explain how Bunuel got salary = 2 commission? What am I doing wrong above? Am I missing something?

~ Im2bz2p345

Last edited by Im2bz2p345 on 17 Aug 2013, 10:16, edited 2 times in total.
Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 842
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 59

Kudos [?]: 1286 [0], given: 197

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2013, 10:09
Im2bz2p345 wrote:

1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission}

1.1 s + 1.1 c = s + 1.3 c ; for sake of simplicity, let's say that salary = 100 and commission = 100

1.1 (100) + 1.1 (100) = 100 + 1.3 (100)

110 + 110 = 100 + 130

220 < 230

If instead of plugging in values, you decide isolate salary (s) and commission (c) using your formula, it would be:

.10 s = .02 c

In this case, for all positive values salary > commission.

Can someone please help explain how Bunuel got salary = 2 commission? What am I doing wrong above? Am I missing something?

~ Im2bz2p345

hi,

the above highlited part is wrong.
in that you are assuming salary = comission = 100
if both are equal how can you compare which one is bigger.

let say salary = $$s$$
comission =$$c$$

$$1.1(s + c) = s + 1.3 c$$
$$1.1s + 1.1c = s + 1.3 c$$
taking s items one side and c item one side
$$0.1s = 0.2c$$
ok now multiply both sides with 10
$$s = 2c$$

hope its clear now
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...

learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment

Intern
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 30
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2013, 10:17
blueseas wrote:
Im2bz2p345 wrote:

1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission}

1.1 s + 1.1 c = s + 1.3 c ; for sake of simplicity, let's say that salary = 100 and commission = 100

1.1 (100) + 1.1 (100) = 100 + 1.3 (100)

110 + 110 = 100 + 130

220 < 230

If instead of plugging in values, you decide isolate salary (s) and commission (c) using your formula, it would be:

.10 s = .02 c

In this case, for all positive values salary > commission.

Can someone please help explain how Bunuel got salary = 2 commission? What am I doing wrong above? Am I missing something?

~ Im2bz2p345

hi,

the above highlited part is wrong.
in that you are assuming salary = comission = 100
if both are equal how can you compare which one is bigger.

let say salary = $$s$$
comission =$$c$$

$$1.1(s + c) = s + 1.3 c$$
$$1.1s + 1.1c = s + 1.3 c$$
taking s items one side and c item one side
$$0.1s = 0.2c$$
ok now multiply both sides with 10
$$s = 2c$$

hope its clear now

Thank you blueseas! I missed that last step of multiplying both sides by 10, shoot - should have realized it before I posted.

~ Im2bz2p345
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13412
Followers: 575

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 0

Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2014, 01:25
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Posts: 102
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.9
WE: Analyst (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 19

Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2015, 10:39
Bunuel wrote:
devinawilliam83 wrote:
Why is the answer to this A and not D?

A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?

Given: {Income}={salary}+{commission}. Question basically asks: is {salary}>{commission}?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year --> 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission} --> {salary}=2{commission} --> {salary}>{commission}. Sufficient.

(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year --> |{salary}-{commission}|=0.5{salary}, notice that {salary}-{commission} is in absolute value sign ||, meaning that we can have two cases:

A. {salary}-{commission}=0.5{salary} --> 0.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}>{commission}, thus the answer would be YES;
Or:
A. {commission}-{salary}=0.5{salary} --> 1.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}<{commission}, thus the answer would be No.
Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

Dear Bunuel,

I'm not sure if you need to consider two cases here based on the question's second statement.
It is like stating " if the difference between A and B is 4, I would consider A-B = 4 and not |A-B| =4.

The similar question, which you used to merge the topic clearly specifies that the absolute difference between the base salary and the commission is..., there I can understand the two cases but not for the question above, where it does not state anything about the absolute difference.

Intern
Joined: 15 Feb 2015
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2015, 12:48
My 2 cents
from question stem: commission + base = 1

for statement 1,
-> 1.3base + commission = 1.1
plus 1base + commission = 1
-> 0.3 base = 0.1
-> base = 33%
-> sufficient

for statement 2,
-> base - commission = 0.5base
or
-> commission - base = 0.5base
-> base is equal 50% or 33%
-> not greater than 50%
-> not suffificent

JMO, please correct me if there is any logical flaw. Thanks very much!

Last edited by cherryli2015 on 16 Feb 2015, 18:37, edited 1 time in total.
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 8264
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Followers: 379

Kudos [?]: 2453 [0], given: 163

Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2015, 17:30
Hi santorasantu,

The prompt never stated whether the base salary was larger than the commission or the commission was larger than the base salary, so we CANNOT assume that the base salary is bigger just because it was mentioned first in the sentence. The word "difference" implies that one of them IS bigger, but we don't know which one. THAT is why Bunuel addressed it.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
_________________

# Rich Cohen

Co-Founder & GMAT Assassin

# Special Offer: Save $75 + GMAT Club Tests 60-point improvement guarantee www.empowergmat.com/ ***********************Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!*********************** Intern Joined: 31 Jul 2015 Posts: 1 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1 Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 Jul 2015, 16:38 For statement 1, why can we assume that the base salary stays the same? i.e no percent change associated with base salary. If only the commission had been 30% higher, then the answer would be A, but what if the base salary could be, for example, 20% lower? Wouldn't the answer then be E? Thanks EMPOWERgmat Instructor Status: GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat Joined: 19 Dec 2014 Posts: 8264 Location: United States (CA) GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49 GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170 Followers: 379 Kudos [?]: 2453 [1] , given: 163 Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base [#permalink] ### Show Tags 01 Aug 2015, 10:34 1 This post received KUDOS Expert's post Hi stopchange, The specific question that is asked refers to a base salary and a commission LAST YEAR, so we're dealing with 2 unknowns, NOT 2 variables. This means that the two numbers are constants, but we do NOT know what they are (and thus, we don't know which one is bigger). Fact 1 uses a 'hypothetical' that points out that increasing JUST the commission (by 30%) would have led to an increase in income (of 10%). By extension, this assumes that the other pieces (in this case, the base salary) stay the same. GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich _________________ # Rich Cohen Co-Founder & GMAT Assassin # Special Offer: Save$75 + GMAT Club Tests

60-point improvement guarantee
www.empowergmat.com/

***********************Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!***********************

Re: A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base   [#permalink] 01 Aug 2015, 10:34

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A certain salesman earns a flat payment of \$12 per sale on sales up to 3 03 Nov 2015, 12:51
28 Each week a certain salesman is paid a fixed amount equal to 20 21 Jul 2012, 11:30
5 A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base 4 25 Nov 2011, 14:19
5 A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base 5 03 Oct 2011, 18:02
2 Each week a certain salesman is paid a fixed amount equal to 3 04 May 2011, 18:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by