Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 25 May 2016, 13:01

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 56 [5] , given: 3

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2013, 03:13
5
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (02:45) correct 46% (01:43) wrong based on 349 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought
a psychologist’s help with a personal problem. Of those
less, 20 percent claimed that treatment “made things a
treatment, 36 percent claimed that treatment “made
things a lot better.” Therefore, psychological treatment
lasting more than 6 months is more effective than
shorter-term treatment.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously
weakens the argument?
for longer than 6 months, 10 percent said that
than 6 months were more likely to respond to
treatment for a shorter time.
(C) Patients who feel they are doing well in
treatment tend to remain in treatment, while
those who are doing poorly tend to quit earlier.
(D) Patients who were dissatisfied with their
treatment were more likely to feel a need to
express their feelings about it and thus to
return the survey.
(E) Many psychologists encourage their patients to
receive treatment for longer than 6 months.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If questions jerk in your mind, then give me a KUDOS

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 144
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 138 [3] , given: 9

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2013, 20:11
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
This critical reasoning question focuses on a flawed use of statistics. A higher percentage of people who received treatment for longer than 6 months felt a lot better than did those who received treatment for under 6 months. The interesting thing about this question is that one pool leads directly into the other. People must receive therapy for less than 6 months before converting into the other pool and receiving therapy for more than 6 months.

Answer choice C points this out and weakens the argument effectively. If people are more likely to stay in therapy longer if it is going well, then a higher percentage of those people in therapy for a longer time will respond positively than will those who receive therapy for shorter time periods. Thus it is not necessarily the longer therapy that is more effective, but rather that for people who find therapy effective they stay with therapy longer. This could be thought of as reverse causation of sorts. Instead of long therapy causing more positive results, more positive results will result in longer therapy.

I hope this helps!!!
_________________

Brandon
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Save $100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options. Veritas Prep Reviews Manager Joined: 14 Dec 2011 Posts: 213 GPA: 3.46 WE: Information Technology (Consulting) Followers: 3 Kudos [?]: 206 [0], given: 172 Re: A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought [#permalink] ### Show Tags 19 Nov 2013, 20:46 Hi Brandon, I was stuck between B & C. Could you please point out the flaw in the option B? Will appreciate. Thanks. VeritasPrepBrandon wrote: This critical reasoning question focuses on a flawed use of statistics. A higher percentage of people who received treatment for longer than 6 months felt a lot better than did those who received treatment for under 6 months. The interesting thing about this question is that one pool leads directly into the other. People must receive therapy for less than 6 months before converting into the other pool and receiving therapy for more than 6 months. Answer choice C points this out and weakens the argument effectively. If people are more likely to stay in therapy longer if it is going well, then a higher percentage of those people in therapy for a longer time will respond positively than will those who receive therapy for shorter time periods. Thus it is not necessarily the longer therapy that is more effective, but rather that for people who find therapy effective they stay with therapy longer. This could be thought of as reverse causation of sorts. Instead of long therapy causing more positive results, more positive results will result in longer therapy. I hope this helps!!! Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 23 Oct 2013 Posts: 144 Followers: 21 Kudos [?]: 138 [2] , given: 9 Re: A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought [#permalink] ### Show Tags 20 Nov 2013, 06:43 2 This post received KUDOS Expert's post Answer choice B in this question is wrong because it does not specify anything about those who felt it helped being more or less likely to respond, but rather just focuses on those who have received therapy for a longer time period being more likely to respond. Basically it is not focused on the correct differentiator. If there were 100 people who received therapy for more than 6 months and 100 people who received therapy for less than 6 months, and 50 of the people who received therapy for more than 6 months replied, but only 30 of those who received therapy for under 6 months replied, this does not change the fact that a higher percentage of the respondents of the longer therapy were helped. [quote="mba1382"]Hi Brandon, I was stuck between B & C. Could you please point out the flaw in the option B? Will appreciate. Thanks. _________________ Brandon Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor If you found this post helpful, please give me kudos!!! Save$100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2011
Posts: 213
GPA: 3.46
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 206 [0], given: 172

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2013, 08:36
Thanks Brendon. Indeed nice explanation

VeritasPrepBrandon wrote:
Answer choice B in this question is wrong because it does not specify anything about those who felt it helped being more or less likely to respond, but rather just focuses on those who have received therapy for a longer time period being more likely to respond. Basically it is not focused on the correct differentiator. If there were 100 people who received therapy for more than 6 months and 100 people who received therapy for less than 6 months, and 50 of the people who received therapy for more than 6 months replied, but only 30 of those who received therapy for under 6 months replied, this does not change the fact that a higher percentage of the respondents of the longer therapy were helped.

mba1382 wrote:
Hi Brandon,

I was stuck between B & C. Could you please point out the flaw in the option B? Will appreciate. Thanks.
Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2013
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 29

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2013, 10:57
Well yes, initially it seems that answer c is wrong; However,option c is right as it directly affects the # of people surveyed ( who remained and who left) whereas the option b is more on doubt about the degree of likeliness to respond or surveyed but does not communicate whether they have actually participated in survey or not. But option C, if true, will surly affect the difference in # of respondents responded between the two groups.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7645
Followers: 709

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2015, 01:39
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: A consumer magazine surveyed people who had sought   [#permalink] 09 Feb 2015, 01:39
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A social worker surveyed 200 women who recently had given bi 1 10 Sep 2013, 06:21
12 A recent study of people who had successfully lost weight 11 16 Sep 2012, 00:01
2 Recent surveys show that many people who have left medical 9 20 Apr 2008, 05:47
Statistician: A financial magazine claimed that its survey 6 06 Jul 2007, 02:23
Finding of a survey of Systems magazine subscribers: Thirty 9 31 Oct 2006, 09:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by