Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Sep 2014, 18:31

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
4 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 905
Concentration: General Management, General Management
Schools: ISB '16
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 208 [4] , given: 312

Premium Member CAT Tests
A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2013, 07:33
4
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

48% (02:18) correct 52% (01:25) wrong based on 176 sessions
A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport congestion and the pollution it causes is to provide high-speed train service between major cities in China, lying 300 to 800 kilometers apart. This plan would cost far less than the expansion of existing airports and would reduce the number of airplanes clogging airports and polluting the air.

Which of the following, if true, could opponents of the plan most appropriately cite as a piece of evidence for their objection to the plan?

In order to maintain current levels of airport congestion, significant repairs of airports must be undertaken.
The high-speed trains that would be used as part of such plan cause more pollution per passenger than do planes.
The majority of passengers departing from rural airports are flying to destinations in cities over 800 kilometers away.
Many new airports are being built in areas that are not yet served by high-speed train service.
A large proportion of air passengers in China take short-distance flights.
Source: Veri prep
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Jul 2012
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2013, 11:50
targetgmatchotu wrote:
A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport congestion and the pollution it causes is to provide high-speed train service between major cities in China, lying 300 to 800 kilometers apart. This plan would cost far less than the expansion of existing airports and would reduce the number of airplanes clogging airports and polluting the air.

Which of the following, if true, could opponents of the plan most appropriately cite as a piece of evidence for their objection to the plan?

In order to maintain current levels of airport congestion, significant repairs of airports must be undertaken.
The high-speed trains that would be used as part of such plan cause more pollution per passenger than do planes.
The majority of passengers departing from rural airports are flying to destinations in cities over 800 kilometers away.
Many new airports are being built in areas that are not yet served by high-speed train service.
A large proportion of air passengers in China take short-distance flights.
Source: Veri prep


C seems more likely than B.
B talks about the pollution created by high-speed trains versus the planes, both in normal mode of operation. But the stem talks about the pollution created by planes congesting the airport which would result in higher pollution per passenger than by the planes in normal mode of operation. So, 'B' doesn't weaken it a whole lot. However, if C is true, then the plan will be ineffective in reducing the airport traffic as most most people are flying to cities more than 800 km away, thereby weakening the proposal.
Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2403
Followers: 291

Kudos [?]: 2449 [0], given: 693

Re: A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2013, 12:26
Expert's post
navinag wrote:
targetgmatchotu wrote:
A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport congestion and the pollution it causes is to provide high-speed train service between major cities in China, lying 300 to 800 kilometers apart. This plan would cost far less than the expansion of existing airports and would reduce the number of airplanes clogging airports and polluting the air.

Which of the following, if true, could opponents of the plan most appropriately cite as a piece of evidence for their objection to the plan?

In order to maintain current levels of airport congestion, significant repairs of airports must be undertaken.
The high-speed trains that would be used as part of such plan cause more pollution per passenger than do planes.
The majority of passengers departing from rural airports are flying to destinations in cities over 800 kilometers away.
Many new airports are being built in areas that are not yet served by high-speed train service.
A large proportion of air passengers in China take short-distance flights.
Source: Veri prep


C seems more likely than B.
B talks about the pollution created by high-speed trains versus the planes, both in normal mode of operation. But the stem talks about the pollution created by planes congesting the airport which would result in higher pollution per passenger than by the planes in normal mode of operation. So, 'B' doesn't weaken it a whole lot. However, if C is true, then the plan will be ineffective in reducing the airport traffic as most most people are flying to cities more than 800 km away, thereby weakening the proposal.



No here we do not care of something over 800 km. is beyond the scope of the question.

B is the correct answer
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS
Quant: 1. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 2. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 3. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version
Verbal:1. Best EXTERNAL resources to tackle the GMAT Verbal Section 2. e-GMAT's ALL CR topics-Consolidated 3. New Critical Reasoning question bank by carcass 4. Meaning/Clarity SC Question Bank by Carcass_Souvik 5. e-GMAT's ALL SC topics-Consolidated-2nd Edition 6. The best reading to improve Reading Comprehension 7.Verbal question bank and Directories

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Jul 2012
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2013, 12:35
carcass wrote:
navinag wrote:
targetgmatchotu wrote:
A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport congestion and the pollution it causes is to provide high-speed train service between major cities in China, lying 300 to 800 kilometers apart. This plan would cost far less than the expansion of existing airports and would reduce the number of airplanes clogging airports and polluting the air.

Which of the following, if true, could opponents of the plan most appropriately cite as a piece of evidence for their objection to the plan?

In order to maintain current levels of airport congestion, significant repairs of airports must be undertaken.
The high-speed trains that would be used as part of such plan cause more pollution per passenger than do planes.
The majority of passengers departing from rural airports are flying to destinations in cities over 800 kilometers away.
Many new airports are being built in areas that are not yet served by high-speed train service.
A large proportion of air passengers in China take short-distance flights.
Source: Veri prep


C seems more likely than B.
B talks about the pollution created by high-speed trains versus the planes, both in normal mode of operation. But the stem talks about the pollution created by planes congesting the airport which would result in higher pollution per passenger than by the planes in normal mode of operation. So, 'B' doesn't weaken it a whole lot. However, if C is true, then the plan will be ineffective in reducing the airport traffic as most most people are flying to cities more than 800 km away, thereby weakening the proposal.



No here we do not care of something over 800 km. is beyond the scope of the question.

B is the correct answer



Would you please explain why you consider C to be out of scope ?
Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2403
Followers: 291

Kudos [?]: 2449 [0], given: 693

Re: A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2013, 13:47
Expert's post
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Jul 2012
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2013, 19:28
carcass wrote:
simply because we care about the stretch between 300 and 800 km not over.


Re-reading the option choice "The majority of passengers departing from rural airports are flying to destinations in cities over 800 kilometers away" tells me that it talks about 'the majority of passengers departing from rural airports' which may form a very small percentage of overall passenger traffic incoming at the city airport. That'd invalidate this option, but definitely not the reason " we care about the stretch between 300 and 800 km not over".

Any other thoughts anybody ?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2012
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 22

Re: A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2013, 04:02
carcass wrote:
simply because we care about the stretch between 300 and 800 km not over.


Could you please explain why is D wrong
2 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 838
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 37

Kudos [?]: 592 [2] , given: 197

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2013, 04:16
2
This post received
KUDOS
amitprakash09 wrote:
carcass wrote:
simply because we care about the stretch between 300 and 800 km not over.


Could you please explain why is D wrong


conclusion:
trains ==>this will reduce congestion ,reduce pollution...and they are also profitable.
now we have to weaken this conclusion.

option D says:
Many new airports are being built in areas that are not yet served by high-speed train service.
it is just stating fact ..that airports are in construction this has no effect on conlusion...

hope it helps.
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 838
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 37

Kudos [?]: 592 [0], given: 197

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2013, 04:18
carcass wrote:
simply because we care about the stretch between 300 and 800 km not over.


no this is not true.

option C is wrong because it is just talking about rural airports.....hence that option is not considering the full scenarios.(excluding airports from urban areas)
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 128
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 110

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport [#permalink] New post 06 Dec 2013, 06:46
not able to understand why B is correct. It say that pollution per passenger is more for trains. So the argument assumes that number of passenger travelling in the train is more that that of plane. While generally this may be true, it may not be always true.

eg if there are 100 person travelling by train and 300 by airplane, then pollution by train may be less than plane. what am i missing here?
_________________

“Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be wrong.”

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2403
Followers: 291

Kudos [?]: 2449 [1] , given: 693

Re: A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport [#permalink] New post 06 Dec 2013, 08:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
ankur1901 wrote:
not able to understand why B is correct. It say that pollution per passenger is more for trains. So the argument assumes that number of passenger travelling in the train is more that that of plane. While generally this may be true, it may not be always true.

eg if there are 100 person travelling by train and 300 by airplane, then pollution by train may be less than plane. what am i missing here?


buyt here you are assuming a sort of information that you bring from the outside, from the real world.

You must weaken the argument according to the info IN the argument: the question if we have more passengers who use trains more than planes is not our concern in this precise moment.

hope this help
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS
Quant: 1. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 2. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 3. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version
Verbal:1. Best EXTERNAL resources to tackle the GMAT Verbal Section 2. e-GMAT's ALL CR topics-Consolidated 3. New Critical Reasoning question bank by carcass 4. Meaning/Clarity SC Question Bank by Carcass_Souvik 5. e-GMAT's ALL SC topics-Consolidated-2nd Edition 6. The best reading to improve Reading Comprehension 7.Verbal question bank and Directories

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1667
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Investment Banking)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 275

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2014, 08:56
carcass wrote:
ankur1901 wrote:
not able to understand why B is correct. It say that pollution per passenger is more for trains. So the argument assumes that number of passenger travelling in the train is more that that of plane. While generally this may be true, it may not be always true.

eg if there are 100 person travelling by train and 300 by airplane, then pollution by train may be less than plane. what am i missing here?


buyt here you are assuming a sort of information that you bring from the outside, from the real world.

You must weaken the argument according to the info IN the argument: the question if we have more passengers who use trains more than planes is not our concern in this precise moment.

hope this help


Also 'rural' is a key word, that is not mentioned anywhere in stimulus. One fake move (or word on this case) and you're done

But still between B and C it is a close call. I personally like B better, but that's just me.
Re: A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport   [#permalink] 09 Jan 2014, 08:56
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport kkalyan 5 10 Sep 2011, 01:38
5 One-fourth of a solution that was 10% by weight was replaced ast 9 04 Oct 2008, 02:53
Solution Problem study 3 25 Jan 2009, 11:19
airport rao 4 07 Sep 2008, 09:49
Exponents Problem solution alefiya 2 11 Mar 2007, 15:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A cost-effective solution to the problem of airport

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.