Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 13:48 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 13:48

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Apr 2016
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 473 [139]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: NUS '18 (I)
GRE 1: Q165 V156
GPA: 3
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2014
Posts: 71
Own Kudos [?]: 121 [21]
Given Kudos: 39
Location: India
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1436
Own Kudos [?]: 4543 [5]
Given Kudos: 1228
Location: India
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Mar 2014
Posts: 97
Own Kudos [?]: 32 [3]
Given Kudos: 616
Schools: Tepper '18
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Vyshak wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Correct - A country could keep ........... but it would..........

A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Changes the meaning

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'like' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'as' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Usage of 'and' distorts the contrast

Answer: A


IMO the usage of 'it' in option A twice referring to different things is incorrect. This is extremely ambiguous. As you rightly pointed out option E is also incorrect for using 'and' but still i think it is better than A. Can you please explain?
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1436
Own Kudos [?]: 4543 [0]
Given Kudos: 1228
Location: India
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
MeghaP wrote:
Vyshak wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Correct - A country could keep ........... but it would..........

A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Changes the meaning

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'like' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'as' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Usage of 'and' distorts the contrast

Answer: A


IMO the usage of 'it' in option A twice referring to different things is incorrect. This is extremely ambiguous. As you rightly pointed out option E is also incorrect for using 'and' but still i think it is better than A. Can you please explain?


The answer requires a contrast. So E cannot be the answer. In the colored portion the 1st 'it' logically refers to 'country' and the 2nd 'it' must logically refer to 'agreement'. A may not be a perfect answer choice, but it is the best possible answer choice.
Director
Director
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 530
Own Kudos [?]: 523 [3]
Given Kudos: 916
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
3
Kudos
mukulgupta5 wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.


look at d.
a country could keep as norway has
the latter part of ellipsis has an helping verb, the preceding part must have the same helping verb ,though it maybe is in different tense.
so, we have "has" in the latter part, we need "have, had" in the first part. no that word in the first part. D is wrong
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Feb 2014
Posts: 79
Own Kudos [?]: 338 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
Schools: LBS MIF '19
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.3
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
How exactly does the removal of the second 'it' change the meaning in B?

Thanks in advance!
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
rs47 wrote:
How exactly does the removal of the second 'it' change the meaning in B?

Thanks in advance!


In "B" removal of "it" does not change the meaning, but replacement of "could" with "that" changes the meaning.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2015
Status:I am not giving up. Not yet.
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 71 [0]
Given Kudos: 392
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
Vyshak wrote:
MeghaP wrote:
Vyshak wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Correct - A country could keep ........... but it would..........

A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Changes the meaning

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'like' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - usage of 'as' is incorrect

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy. - Incorrect - Usage of 'and' distorts the contrast

Answer: A


IMO the usage of 'it' in option A twice referring to different things is incorrect. This is extremely ambiguous. As you rightly pointed out option E is also incorrect for using 'and' but still i think it is better than A. Can you please explain?


The answer requires a contrast. So E cannot be the answer. In the colored portion the 1st 'it' logically refers to 'country' and the 2nd 'it' must logically refer to 'agreement'. A may not be a perfect answer choice, but it is the best possible answer choice.


In A
Is the second "it" not a 'Placeholder'?
Check this out: placeholder-it-111879.html
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
peekaysan wrote:
Vyshak wrote:
MeghaP wrote:

IMO the usage of 'it' in option A twice referring to different things is incorrect. This is extremely ambiguous. As you rightly pointed out option E is also incorrect for using 'and' but still i think it is better than A. Can you please explain?


The answer requires a contrast. So E cannot be the answer. In the colored portion the 1st 'it' logically refers to 'country' and the 2nd 'it' must logically refer to 'agreement'. A may not be a perfect answer choice, but it is the best possible answer choice.


In A
Is the second "it" not a 'Placeholder'?
Check this out: placeholder-it-111879.html


Yes the second "it" is a placeholder for "to influence trade and competition policy".
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2016
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
I have some confusion between A & C. A & C differ only in the use of "such as the one Norway has" and "like the one Norway has" . Could some please help me in identifying why "such as" is better suited here. I chose C as my answer.
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1436
Own Kudos [?]: 4543 [2]
Given Kudos: 1228
Location: India
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Vin07 wrote:
I have some confusion between A & C. A & C differ only in the use of "such as the one Norway has" and "like the one Norway has" . Could some please help me in identifying why "such as" is better suited here. I chose C as my answer.


For examples, we use 'such as'. 'Like' is used to compare nouns.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2015
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GPA: 3.4
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
mukulgupta5 wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.


If I remember correctly, egmat mentions the usage of "Of being" as incorrect. And the only acceptable usages of "Being" are:
1. If Being is Used as Noun
2. When Passive continuous verb tense is required to communicate the meaning.

Can anyone help explain if my understanding is correct.
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5425 [0]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
Expert Reply
andy2502 wrote:
mukulgupta5 wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country that keeps some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, but would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, like the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has, and yet find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.


If I remember correctly, egmat mentions the usage of "Of being" as incorrect. And the only acceptable usages of "Being" are:
1. If Being is Used as Noun
2. When Passive continuous verb tense is required to communicate the meaning.

Can anyone help explain if my understanding is correct.


I would suggest try to deconstruct the meaning instead of learning such rules.

The sentence clearly states that the advantage of being a part of European movement and not advantage of European Union itself.

Hence, 'being' being a very tricky word, I would also go for the meaning before making a final call.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2016
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 153 [0]
Given Kudos: 145
Location: India
GPA: 3.9
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

Will the above sentence be incorrect?

I could not make the difference whether the author is trying to compare a country and Norway or presenting Norway as an example. Please help !
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [4]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
AR15J wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

Will the above sentence be incorrect?

I could not make the difference whether the author is trying to compare a country and Norway or presenting Norway as an example. Please help !


A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has KEPT, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

You missed the word "kept". A word that is not already present in the first element of a parallel structure cannot be omitted from the second element of the structure.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Status:Countdown Begins...
Posts: 242
Own Kudos [?]: 144 [0]
Given Kudos: 80
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
I have a doubt on use of a term - such as the ONE Norway has.

In my opinion, it implies that - A country can keep some advantages as Norway has kept its advantages.
If this is true, by stating "such as the ONE Norway has" , "ONE" refers to Norway or "Advantages"?. I felt it was referring to advantages and thought that it is a wrong comparison.

Please help with some examples using "such as the one" phrase.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5179
Own Kudos [?]: 4652 [0]
Given Kudos: 626
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
Expert Reply
RMD007 wrote:
I have a doubt on use of a term - such as the ONE Norway has.

In my opinion, it implies that - A country can keep some advantages as Norway has kept its advantages.
If this is true, by stating "such as the ONE Norway has" , "ONE" refers to Norway or "Advantages"?. I felt it was referring to advantages and thought that it is a wrong comparison.

Please help with some examples using "such as the one" phrase.
Here one is referring to association agreement.

You should read with an association agreement, such as the one Norway has as with an association agreement, such as the association agreement that Norway has.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2016
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 153 [0]
Given Kudos: 145
Location: India
GPA: 3.9
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
sayantanc2k wrote:
AR15J wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

Will the above sentence be incorrect?

I could not make the difference whether the author is trying to compare a country and Norway or presenting Norway as an example. Please help !


A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has KEPT, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

You missed the word "kept". A word that is not already present in the first element of a parallel structure cannot be omitted from the second element of the structure.


Thanks for clarifying. Will the below choice be correct?

A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
AR15J wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
AR15J wrote:
A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

Will the above sentence be incorrect?

I could not make the difference whether the author is trying to compare a country and Norway or presenting Norway as an example. Please help !


A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European Union with an association agreement, as Norway has KEPT, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

You missed the word "kept". A word that is not already present in the first element of a parallel structure cannot be omitted from the second element of the structure.


Thanks for clarifying. Will the below choice be correct?

A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, as the one Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.


No, LIKE instead of AS should be used because the comparison is between the nouns "association" and "one". The verbs " has" and "could keep" are not compared, hence "as" is wrong.

The following would be correct:

A country could keep some of the advantages of the European Union with an association agreement, like the one (that) Norway has, but it would find it much harder to influence trade and competition policy.

Note: "(that) Norway has" is a relative clause modifier referring to "one" - not a clause compared with the opening clause ("A country could keep some of the advantages...").
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A country could keep some of the advantages of being in the European U [#permalink]
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne