Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 May 2013, 09:26
Customize  |  Hide

A few people who are bad writers simply cannot improve their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 247
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 78

CAT Tests
A few people who are bad writers simply cannot improve their [#permalink] New post 23 Jul 2012, 06:17
00:00

Question Stats:

64% (02:18) correct 35% (01:19) wrong based on 2 sessions
A few people who are bad writers simply cannot improve their writing, whether or not they receive instruction. still, most bad writers can at least be taught to improve their writing enough so that they are no longer bad writers. However, no one can become a great writer simply by being taught how to be a better writer, since great writers must have not just skill, but also talent.
Which one of the following can be properly infered from the passage above?
A). All bad writers can become better writers.
B). All great writers had to be taught to become better writers.
C). Some bad writer can never become great writers.
D). Some bad writers can become great writers.
E). Some great writers can be taught to be even better writers.

Can someone please shed some light on this question as to how you approach this question. Do you use Logic Diagrams in such questions?

Thanks
H
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 14
Schools: Booth '15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 8

Re: A few people who are bad writers simply [#permalink] New post 23 Jul 2012, 08:20
I picked C. Here is my reason:

Bad Writer - > taught/skill !-> great writer
bad writer -> taught/skill -> some still bad (first line)

taught + talent -> great writer (last line)

from the diag. above: only C is correct that some bad writers can't become great writers.

PS: !-> stands for does not implies.
2 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3111
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 572

Kudos [?]: 2011 [2] , given: 92

Re: A few people who are bad writers simply [#permalink] New post 24 Jul 2012, 04:53
2
This post received
KUDOS
imhimanshu wrote:
A few people who are bad writers simply cannot improve their writing, whether or not they receive instruction. still, most bad writers can at least be taught to improve their writing enough so that they are no longer bad writers. However, no one can become a great writer simply by being taught how to be a better writer, since great writers must have not just skill, but also talent.
Which one of the following can be properly infered from the passage above?
A). All bad writers can become better writers.
B). All great writers had to be taught to become better writers.
C). Some bad writer can never become great writers.
D). Some bad writers can become great writers.
E). Some great writers can be taught to be even better writers.

Can someone please shed some light on this question as to how you approach this question. Do you use Logic Diagrams in such questions?

Thanks
H


You don't need any venn diagrams for this question. Just pick the required info:

1. Some bad writer CANNOT get better.
2. Most bad writers can be taught enough to be not bad anymore.
3. No one can become great by simply being taught how to be better since you need talent to be great.

Option (C) is straight forward - some bad writers can never become great (in fact some cannot even get better, forget about great).

Look at the other options:

A). All bad writers can become better writers - Incorrect according to the argument
B). All great writers had to be taught to become better writers - Incorrect according to the argument
D). Some bad writers can become great writers - Perhaps not! May be, if they have hidden talent but we certainly cannot infer this statement from the argument. The argument only tells us what cannot make one a great writer. It doesn't tell us what will make someone great.
E). Some great writers can be taught to be even better writers. - The argument doesn't talk about making great even better.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 361
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 50

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: A few people who are bad writers simply [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2012, 22:45
If in option C some is replaced by ALL, will it be still correct?
_________________

Regards
SD
-----------------------------
Press Kudos if you like my post.
Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html

Re: A few people who are bad writers simply   [#permalink] 28 Jul 2012, 22:45
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Compared to us, people who lived a century ago had very few mohitguptask 5 24 May 2005, 06:48
Popular new posts Louis: People' intentions cannot be, on the whole, more bad rlevochkin 12 28 Dec 2005, 13:35
New posts People who are red/green color-blind cannot distinguish vaivish1723 2 01 Jul 2009, 01:06
Popular new posts 2 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Q31)Linsey has been judged to be a bad songwriter simply RaviChandra 12 29 Apr 2010, 09:48
New posts Is Taking the GMAT a few years early a bad idea? Devon 0 22 Apr 2013, 09:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A few people who are bad writers simply cannot improve their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.