Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 06 Jul 2015, 12:47

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 418
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Followers: 57

Kudos [?]: 474 [0], given: 182

A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided [#permalink] New post 14 Jan 2013, 09:37
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (02:52) correct 48% (01:50) wrong based on 305 sessions
A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided to spend a significant portion of its remaining cash on a shipment of recycled paper pulp that can be used to make paper for a future book. Even though the published book will earn more than the cost of the materials it is printed on, this is a financially foolish decision. The publisher owns rights to tracks of forest land that could be legally cut for pulp at a cost lower than that of the recycled paper pulp.

Each of the following, if true, would provide support for the publisher's decision, EXCEPT:
(A) Federal law requires that timber land that is cut be reseeded to re-grow the forest and this cost is included in the cost to cut the trees for pulp.
(B) The paper mill used by the publisher works much more efficiently with the short strands of recycled pulp than it does with the long strands of newly cut pulp, saving the publisher money on the rental of the mill facility.
(C) The new book will be about recycling and will therefore have poor sales if it is not printed on recycled paper.
(D) The publisher's forest is far from its paper mill, and transportation costs are not included in cost of cutting trees for pulp.
(E) The publisher will sell the rights to the forest land for more than the difference in price between purchased recycled pulp and pulp from newly cut trees.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Thanks,
PraPon

Tough 700+ Level RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7
Reading Comprehension notes: Click here
VOTE: vote-best-gmat-practice-tests-excluding-gmatprep-144859.html
PowerScore CR Bible - Official Guide 13 Questions Set Mapped: Click here

Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2430
Followers: 766

Kudos [?]: 3083 [2] , given: 38

Re: A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided [#permalink] New post 14 Jan 2013, 14:55
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
PraPon wrote:
A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided to spend a significant portion of its remaining cash on a shipment of recycled paper pulp that can be used to make paper for a future book. Even though the published book will earn more than the cost of the materials it is printed on, this is a financially foolish decision. The publisher owns rights to tracks of forest land that could be legally cut for pulp at a cost lower than that of the recycled paper pulp.

Each of the following, if true, would provide support for the publisher's decision, EXCEPT:

I'm happy to help with this. :-)

Naively, it seems that the publisher is making an unwise decision -- spending its limited funds on recycled paper rather than using the lower cost legally cut pulp from its own forest. We are asked to strengthen the publisher's decision, to provide support for it. This would come in the form of some additional source of revenue doing it this way, or some additional cost in doing it the other way.

(A) Federal law requires that timber land that is cut be reseeded to re-grow the forest and this cost is included in the cost to cut the trees for pulp.
This is tricky --- yes, there's a reseeding cost, but this is already included in the cost of the pulp. Even though the choice discusses an extra cost, there's no addition cost to the publisher beyond what is already discussed in the question. Therefore, this information doesn't change anything from the financial arrangements discussed in the prompt. It's not clear that this does anything to strengthen or weaken anything from the original prompt.

(B) The paper mill used by the publisher works much more efficiently with the short strands of recycled pulp than it does with the long strands of newly cut pulp, saving the publisher money on the rental of the mill facility.
This points out a savings that would result from the publisher's chosen course, which supports why the publisher chose it. This is not correct.

(C) The new book will be about recycling and will therefore have poor sales if it is not printed on recycled paper
This points out a possible cost attached to pursing the path the publisher didn't chose, which supports why the publisher chose the path they did. This is not correct.

(D) The publisher's forest is far from its paper mill, and transportation costs are not included in cost of cutting trees for pulp.
This points out a possible cost attached to pursing the path the publisher didn't chose, which supports why the publisher chose the path they did. This is not correct.

(E) The publisher will sell the rights to the forest land for more than the difference in price between purchased recycled pulp and pulp from newly cut trees.
This points out a source of income that will more than compensate for the apparent cost in the path the publisher choose. This supports the publisher's decision, so this is incorrect.

Because (A) doesn't provide any clear support, and because (B)-(E) all supply very clear support, (A) is the best possible answer here.

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4383
Followers: 474

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided [#permalink] New post 21 Feb 2014, 12:24
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 16
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 03-14-2015
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 132

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2015, 09:11
Hi mikemcgarry ,
Can Please someone help me understand what the question is asking

Each of the following, if true, would provide support for the publisher's decision, EXCEPT:


what does the "EXCEPT" written in the question means?

doesn't this means that:
each of the following would provide support for the publisher's decision,except the choice x which will not support it
So we are asked to support the conclusion in the argument rather than the publisher's decision

please help
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2430
Followers: 766

Kudos [?]: 3083 [1] , given: 38

Re: A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2015, 10:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
vinyasgupta wrote:
Hi mikemcgarry ,
Can Please someone help me understand what the question is asking

Each of the following, if true, would provide support for the publisher's decision, EXCEPT:

what does the "EXCEPT" written in the question means?

doesn't this means that:
each of the following would provide support for the publisher's decision,except the choice x which will not support it
So we are asked to support the conclusion in the argument rather than the publisher's decision

please help

Dear vinyasgupta
I'm happy to respond. :-)

On an ordinary GMAT CR question, one choice correctly answers the question posed, and four choices are faulty in one way or another. The EXCEPT questions are very different. In a GMAT CR EXCEPT question, four of the choices will flawlessly answer the question, and only one will not. The anti-intuitive thing is that you have to reject all the choices that perfectly answer the question, and find that one that is faulty in one way or another.

Here's the prompt again for this question:
A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided to spend a significant portion of its remaining cash on a shipment of recycled paper pulp that can be used to make paper for a future book. Even though the published book will earn more than the cost of the materials it is printed on, this is a financially foolish decision. The publisher owns rights to tracks of forest land that could be legally cut for pulp at a cost lower than that of the recycled paper pulp.

Each of the following, if true, would provide support for the publisher's decision, EXCEPT:

This tells us that four answer choices will provide clear unambiguous support to the publisher's decision; those four will not be the answer to the EXCEPT question. The remaining choice will not support the publisher's decision --- it may be ambiguous, it may support something else, it may be 100% irrelevant, etc. There are many possibilities. All we know about the correct answer to the EXCEPT question is that it will be the one answer that doesn't provide clear support to the publisher's decision.

Here's an article about the analogous question in RC:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-readi ... ng-except/

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 16
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 03-14-2015
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 132

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2015, 10:34
mikemcgarry wrote:
vinyasgupta wrote:
Hi mikemcgarry ,
Can Please someone help me understand what the question is asking

Each of the following, if true, would provide support for the publisher's decision, EXCEPT:

what does the "EXCEPT" written in the question means?

doesn't this means that:
each of the following would provide support for the publisher's decision,except the choice x which will not support it
So we are asked to support the conclusion in the argument rather than the publisher's decision

please help

Dear vinyasgupta
I'm happy to respond. :-)

On an ordinary GMAT CR question, one choice correctly answers the question posed, and four choices are faulty in one way or another. The EXCEPT questions are very different. In a GMAT CR EXCEPT question, four of the choices will flawlessly answer the question, and only one will not. The anti-intuitive thing is that you have to reject all the choices that perfectly answer the question, and find that one that is faulty in one way or another.

Here's the prompt again for this question:
A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided to spend a significant portion of its remaining cash on a shipment of recycled paper pulp that can be used to make paper for a future book. Even though the published book will earn more than the cost of the materials it is printed on, this is a financially foolish decision. The publisher owns rights to tracks of forest land that could be legally cut for pulp at a cost lower than that of the recycled paper pulp.

Each of the following, if true, would provide support for the publisher's decision, EXCEPT:

This tells us that four answer choices will provide clear unambiguous support to the publisher's decision; those four will not be the answer to the EXCEPT question. The remaining choice will not support the publisher's decision --- it may be ambiguous, it may support something else, it may be 100% irrelevant, etc. There are many possibilities. All we know about the correct answer to the EXCEPT question is that it will be the one answer that doesn't provide clear support to the publisher's decision.

Here's an article about the analogous question in RC:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-readi ... ng-except/

Mike :-)



Thank you so much mikemcgarry for the help.Now i clearly understand why is A the OA.

VINYAS :-D :-D
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 588
Concentration: International Business, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 75

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2015, 21:35
mikemcgarry wrote:
PraPon wrote:
A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided to spend a significant portion of its remaining cash on a shipment of recycled paper pulp that can be used to make paper for a future book. Even though the published book will earn more than the cost of the materials it is printed on, this is a financially foolish decision. The publisher owns rights to tracks of forest land that could be legally cut for pulp at a cost lower than that of the recycled paper pulp.

Each of the following, if true, would provide support for the publisher's decision, EXCEPT:

I'm happy to help with this. :-)

Naively, it seems that the publisher is making an unwise decision -- spending its limited funds on recycled paper rather than using the lower cost legally cut pulp from its own forest. We are asked to strengthen the publisher's decision, to provide support for it. This would come in the form of some additional source of revenue doing it this way, or some additional cost in doing it the other way.

(A) Federal law requires that timber land that is cut be reseeded to re-grow the forest and this cost is included in the cost to cut the trees for pulp.
This is tricky --- yes, there's a reseeding cost, but this is already included in the cost of the pulp. Even though the choice discusses an extra cost, there's no addition cost to the publisher beyond what is already discussed in the question. Therefore, this information doesn't change anything from the financial arrangements discussed in the prompt. It's not clear that this does anything to strengthen or weaken anything from the original prompt.

(B) The paper mill used by the publisher works much more efficiently with the short strands of recycled pulp than it does with the long strands of newly cut pulp, saving the publisher money on the rental of the mill facility.
This points out a savings that would result from the publisher's chosen course, which supports why the publisher chose it. This is not correct.

(C) The new book will be about recycling and will therefore have poor sales if it is not printed on recycled paper
This points out a possible cost attached to pursing the path the publisher didn't chose, which supports why the publisher chose the path they did. This is not correct.

(D) The publisher's forest is far from its paper mill, and transportation costs are not included in cost of cutting trees for pulp.
This points out a possible cost attached to pursing the path the publisher didn't chose, which supports why the publisher chose the path they did. This is not correct.

(E) The publisher will sell the rights to the forest land for more than the difference in price between purchased recycled pulp and pulp from newly cut trees.
This points out a source of income that will more than compensate for the apparent cost in the path the publisher choose. This supports the publisher's decision, so this is incorrect.

Because (A) doesn't provide any clear support, and because (B)-(E) all supply very clear support, (A) is the best possible answer here.

Mike :-)



Hi Mike,

Could you please debrief on reasons to eliminate C .
(C) The new book will be about recycling and will therefore have poor sales if it is not printed on recycled paper.
How will the buyers know that the book is printed on recycle/new paper ? is it safe to assume that publisher will write it on cover page that this book is made of recycled pulp so that buyers know they are buying a book printed on recycle pulp.?
I found this option really weird as this option suggest that the content of the book is least important than the paper used to print the book and so choose C .

thanks
Lucky.
_________________

Thanks,
Lucky

_______________________________________________________
Kindly press the Image to appreciate my post !! :-)

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2430
Followers: 766

Kudos [?]: 3083 [1] , given: 38

Re: A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided [#permalink] New post 08 Mar 2015, 18:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Lucky2783 wrote:
Hi Mike,

Could you please debrief on reasons to eliminate C .
(C) The new book will be about recycling and will therefore have poor sales if it is not printed on recycled paper.
How will the buyers know that the book is printed on recycle/new paper ? is it safe to assume that publisher will write it on cover page that this book is made of recycled pulp so that buyers know they are buying a book printed on recycle pulp.?
I found this option really weird as this option suggest that the content of the book is least important than the paper used to print the book and so choose C .

thanks
Lucky.

Dear Lucky,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

Here's where we have to be careful with GMAT CR. Again, here's the prompt question:
Each of the following, if true, would provide support for the publisher's decision, EXCEPT:
and here's the text of (C).
(C) The new book will be about recycling and will therefore have poor sales if it is not printed on recycled paper.
We have to take this at face value, as evidence. The new book will have poor sales. Why will it have poor sales? We don't necessary know. If this is true, if it is true that the new book will have poor sales, would that support the publisher's decision.

If it is true, then yes, this one book would have better sales if it is printed on recycled paper. More sales is good for the publisher, so that would be one reason---not necessarily the only reason or the best reason but at least one valid reason---that the publisher would choose to take the action it is taking.

You are asking questions about why this would be true. Understand, that is strictly outside the task on GMAT CR. If we are asked to treat something as true, then it's not our concern about why it would be true.

How would the fact that the book is printed on recycled paper reduce sales? Well, yes, maybe there would be a label on the front cover, "printed on recycled paper," or maybe it would be trumpeted somehow in the way they promote the book. We can speculate, but this is outside the task of answering the question.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 588
Concentration: International Business, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 75

GMAT ToolKit User
A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided [#permalink] New post 10 Mar 2015, 02:09
mikemcgarry wrote:
Lucky2783 wrote:
Hi Mike,

Could you please debrief on reasons to eliminate C .
(C) The new book will be about recycling and will therefore have poor sales if it is not printed on recycled paper.
How will the buyers know that the book is printed on recycle/new paper ? is it safe to assume that publisher will write it on cover page that this book is made of recycled pulp so that buyers know they are buying a book printed on recycle pulp.?
I found this option really weird as this option suggest that the content of the book is least important than the paper used to print the book and so choose C .

thanks
Lucky.

Dear Lucky,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

Here's where we have to be careful with GMAT CR. Again, here's the prompt question:
Each of the following, if true, would provide support for the publisher's decision, EXCEPT:
and here's the text of (C).
(C) The new book will be about recycling and will therefore have poor sales if it is not printed on recycled paper.
We have to take this at face value, as evidence. The new book will have poor sales. Why will it have poor sales? We don't necessary know. If this is true, if it is true that the new book will have poor sales, would that support the publisher's decision.

If it is true, then yes, this one book would have better sales if it is printed on recycled paper. More sales is good for the publisher, so that would be one reason---not necessarily the only reason or the best reason but at least one valid reason---that the publisher would choose to take the action it is taking.

You are asking questions about why this would be true. Understand, that is strictly outside the task on GMAT CR. If we are asked to treat something as true, then it's not our concern about why it would be true.

How would the fact that the book is printed on recycled paper reduce sales? Well, yes, maybe there would be a label on the front cover, "printed on recycled paper," or maybe it would be trumpeted somehow in the way they promote the book. We can speculate, but this is outside the task of answering the question.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)



Great explanation . Thanks so much .
Having Instructors like you, who give their personal time to reply queries of students, on gmatclub is really a fortune for students.
_________________

Thanks,
Lucky

_______________________________________________________
Kindly press the Image to appreciate my post !! :-)

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Posts: 161
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT Date: 05-10-2015
GPA: 3.51
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 43

Re: A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided [#permalink] New post 11 Mar 2015, 07:50
Answer is A.
Reseeding cost is included in the cost to cut the trees, and the cutting cost is already considered in the argument.
_________________

Please give Kudos to the post if you liked.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 204
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 49

Re: A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2015, 01:35
Hey mikemcgarry
I am not able to understand the explanation-there's a reseeding cost, but this is already included in the cost of the pulp. Even though the choice discusses an extra cost, there's no addition cost to the publisher beyond what is already discussed in the question.
"The publisher has track of the forest"-is this the reason from which you have derived the above statement?
Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2430
Followers: 766

Kudos [?]: 3083 [0], given: 38

A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2015, 12:15
Expert's post
ssriva2 wrote:
Hey mikemcgarry
I am not able to understand the explanation-there's a reseeding cost, but this is already included in the cost of the pulp. Even though the choice discusses an extra cost, there's no addition cost to the publisher beyond what is already discussed in the question.
"The publisher has track of the forest"-is this the reason from which you have derived the above statement?

Dear ssriva2,
I'm happy to respond. :-) My friend, I deduced that directly from the information in choice (A). It's very important to read and analyze what is said in the choices. Here's choice (A) again:
(A) Federal law requires that timber land that is cut be reseeded to re-grow the forest and this cost is included in the cost to cut the trees for pulp.
Think about what this says. It presents two different facts:
Fact #1: Federal law requires that timber land that is cut be reseeded to re-grow the forest ...
So, the government says, if I do the work of cutting down trees to use for something, I also have to do the work of reseeding the ground so that a forest eventually grows back. Cutting down trees certainly costs money, and naively, it sounds as the separate work of reseeding the land would also cost money and therefore would increase the cost.
But, then we are told:
Fact #2:... and this cost is included in the cost to cut the trees for pulp.
Ah, as it turns out, the cost of the second job, the job of reseeding, does not present an additional cost. In the cost design here, the cost of reseeding has already been factored in an included in the cost of cutting the trees down.
In the prompt, we are told:
The publisher owns rights to tracks of forest land that could be legally cut for pulp at a cost lower than that of the recycled paper pulp.
(cost of cutting trees) < (cost of recycled paper pulp)
Now, if the seeding added a new cost to the left side of that inequality, it might change the direction of the inequality, calling the evidence of the argument into question. BUT, because seeding is already included in the "cost of cutting trees" and introduces no new expenses, the inequality remains undisturbed by the information in choice (A).

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 204
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 49

Re: A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided [#permalink] New post 24 Mar 2015, 07:38
Thanks mike..
I think i need to read the answer choices very carefully!
Re: A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided   [#permalink] 24 Mar 2015, 07:38
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 A recently published paper concludes that tenured professors or those eshan429 2 02 Sep 2014, 19:27
8 Experts publish their posts in the topic The GRANT Research Institute recently published aalokk 6 21 Jan 2014, 10:14
1 A recently published article on human physiology claims that maddy2u 24 11 Dec 2010, 01:17
5 Publisher Big Books proposal to encourage new authors by sushma0805 7 06 Apr 2010, 14:37
1 Book publishers have traditionally published a few books joemama142000 15 18 Jan 2010, 23:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A financially strapped publisher of books recently decided

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.