Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Mar 2013, 08:15

2

This post received KUDOS

9

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (05:04) correct
50% (03:01) wrong based on 216 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In 2007 it operated at a $1000 loss, it broke even in 2008, and in 2009 its revenues were 44% higher than in 2007. If the firm's revenues and costs grew at a constant rate over this period, what was its profit in 2009?

A. 700 B. 1000 C. 1300 D. 1600 E. 2000

I found this problem quite difficult to be solved under 2 mins. Will be really keen to know if there are any shortcuts to handle such Questions. Would you rate this problem a 700 + ??

Re: A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Mar 2013, 12:48

1

This post received KUDOS

2

This post was BOOKMARKED

mridulparashar1 wrote:

A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In 2007 it operated at a $1000 loss, it broke even in 2008, and in 2009 its revenues were 44% higher than in 2007. If the firm's revenues and costs grew at a constant rate over this period, what was its profit in 2009?

A. 700 B. 1000 C. 1300 D. 1600 E. 2000

First solve for how much revenue is increasing each year: R2008 = R2007*(1+x) R2009 = R2007*(1+x)^2=1.44*R2007 (1+x)^2 = 1.44 1+x=1.2 x=0.2 aka revenue increases 20% each year and cost increases 10% annually

Re: A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Aug 2013, 17:36

2013gmat wrote:

A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In 2007 it operated at a $1000 loss, it broke even in 2008, and in 2009 its revenues were 44% higher than in 2007. If the firm's revenues and costs grew at a constant rate over this period, what was its profit in 2009?

A $700 B $1000 C $1300 D $1600 E $2000

can anyone explain above question ? thanks

By strict definitions, revenue can not be negative. But in the corrupt world of finance, revenue is a number between positive infinity and negative infinity depending on how the upper management instruct the finance people how to lie on the spreadsheets in their submissions to the Securities and exchange commission.
_________________

Re: A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Aug 2013, 19:23

3

This post received KUDOS

1. Let the revenues and costs in 2007 be r1 and c1 respectively. We have r1-c1=-1000 2. Let revenues in 2008 be r2 and c2 respectively. We have r2-c2=0 3. Let revenues and costs in 2009 be r3 and c3 respectively. we have r3=1.44r1. 4. Since the growth rate of sales is constant, growth rate per year is 20%. growth rate of costs is half of that which is 10% 5. (2) can be written as 1.2 r1-1.1 c1=0 6. Solving for (1) and (5), we have c1=12000 andr1=11000 7. r3=1.44*11000= 15840 and c3=1.21*12000=14520 8. Therefore profit in 2009=15840-14520=1320

Re: A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Aug 2013, 02:13

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

SravnaTestPrep wrote:

1. Let the revenues and costs in 2007 be r1 and c1 respectively. We have r1-c1=-1000 2. Let revenues in 2008 be r2 and c2 respectively. We have r2-c2=0 3. Let revenues and costs in 2009 be r3 and c3 respectively. we have r3=1.44r1. 4. Since the growth rate of sales is constant, growth rate per year is 20%. growth rate of costs is half of that which is 10% 5. (2) can be written as 1.2 r1-1.1 c1=0 6. Solving for (1) and (5), we have c1=12000 andr1=11000 7. r3=1.44*11000= 15840 and c3=1.21*12000=14520 8. Therefore profit in 2009=15840-14520=1320

The answer should be $1320

How did you deduce that "growth rate per year is 20%."????
_________________

MODULUS Concept ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-158054.html#p1257636 HEXAGON Theory ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/hexagon-theory-tips-to-solve-any-heaxgon-question-158189.html#p1258308

Re: A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Aug 2013, 03:32

jaituteja wrote:

SravnaTestPrep wrote:

1. Let the revenues and costs in 2007 be r1 and c1 respectively. We have r1-c1=-1000 2. Let revenues in 2008 be r2 and c2 respectively. We have r2-c2=0 3. Let revenues and costs in 2009 be r3 and c3 respectively. we have r3=1.44r1. 4. Since the growth rate of sales is constant, growth rate per year is 20%. growth rate of costs is half of that which is 10% 5. (2) can be written as 1.2 r1-1.1 c1=0 6. Solving for (1) and (5), we have c1=12000 andr1=11000 7. r3=1.44*11000= 15840 and c3=1.21*12000=14520 8. Therefore profit in 2009=15840-14520=1320

The answer should be $1320

How did you deduce that "growth rate per year is 20%."????

The rate can be calculated from the formula (1+r/100) ^2 = 1.44 , which will give r=20
_________________

A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Feb 2014, 09:06

A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In 2007 it operated at a $1000 loss, it broke even in 2008, and in 2009 its revenues were 44% higher than in 2007. If the firm's revenues and costs grew at a constant rate over this period, what was its profit in 2009? a)$700 b)$1000 c)$1300 d)$1600 e)$2000 Also whats the level of this question ?

A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In 2007 it operated at a $1000 loss, it broke even in 2008, and in 2009 its revenues were 44% higher than in 2007. If the firm's revenues and costs grew at a constant rate over this period, what was its profit in 2009? a)$700 b)$1000 c)$1300 d)$1600 e)$2000 Also whats the level of this question ?

Merging similar topics. Please refer to the solutions above.

As for the difficulty level, I'd say it's ~650-700.
_________________

Re: A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Sep 2014, 14:29

SravnaTestPrep wrote:

1. Let the revenues and costs in 2007 be r1 and c1 respectively. We have r1-c1=-1000 2. Let revenues in 2008 be r2 and c2 respectively. We have r2-c2=0 3. Let revenues and costs in 2009 be r3 and c3 respectively. we have r3=1.44r1. 4. Since the growth rate of sales is constant, growth rate per year is 20%. growth rate of costs is half of that which is 10% 5. (2) can be written as 1.2 r1-1.1 c1=0 6. Solving for (1) and (5), we have c1=12000 andr1=11000 7. r3=1.44*11000= 15840 and c3=1.21*12000=14520 8. Therefore profit in 2009=15840-14520=1320

The answer should be $1320

Something is messing up my calculations. I substituted the amount by which C and R go up with X. This meant that at 2009 we needed to find out : R*x^4 - C*X^2. Since X^4 = 1.44 -> X^2 = 1.2 And that's why I multiplied C by 1.2 and not 1.21. Why is this wrong?

1. Let the revenues and costs in 2007 be r1 and c1 respectively. We have r1-c1=-1000 2. Let revenues in 2008 be r2 and c2 respectively. We have r2-c2=0 3. Let revenues and costs in 2009 be r3 and c3 respectively. we have r3=1.44r1. 4. Since the growth rate of sales is constant, growth rate per year is 20%. growth rate of costs is half of that which is 10% 5. (2) can be written as 1.2 r1-1.1 c1=0 6. Solving for (1) and (5), we have c1=12000 andr1=11000 7. r3=1.44*11000= 15840 and c3=1.21*12000=14520 8. Therefore profit in 2009=15840-14520=1320

The answer should be $1320

Something is messing up my calculations. I substituted the amount by which C and R go up with X. This meant that at 2009 we needed to find out : R*x^4 - C*X^2. Since X^4 = 1.44 -> X^2 = 1.2 And that's why I multiplied C by 1.2 and not 1.21. Why is this wrong?

C and R do not go up by the same rate X. You are given that revenue grows twice as fast as cost. So if rate of revenue growth is X, rate of cost growth is X/2.
_________________

A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In 2007 it operated at a $1000 loss, it broke even in 2008, and in 2009 its revenues were 44% higher than in 2007. If the firm's revenues and costs grew at a constant rate over this period, what was its profit in 2009?

A. 700 B. 1000 C. 1300 D. 1600 E. 2000

I found this problem quite difficult to be solved under 2 mins. Will be really keen to know if there are any shortcuts to handle such Questions. Would you rate this problem a 700 + ??

Revenues increased by 44% in 2 years. Rate of revenue increase per year is the same. So

\((1 + x)^2 = 1.44\) \(x = 20%\)

So revenue increases by 20% per year and since cost increases at half the rate, cost increases by 10% every year.

Say 2007 revenue is R and 2007 cost is C. We know C = R + 1000 ....(I)

In 2008, they break even. So 1.1*C = 1.2R Substituting from (I), 1.1*(R + 1000) = 1.2R R = 11,000 C = 12,000

A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Jul 2016, 10:30

WoundedTiger wrote:

A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In 2007 it operated at a $1000 loss, it broke even in 2008, and in 2009 its revenues were 44% higher than in 2007. If the firm's revenues and costs grew at a constant rate over this period, what was its profit in 2009?

A. 700 B. 1000 C. 1300 D. 1600 E. 2000

I found this problem quite difficult to be solved under 2 mins. Will be really keen to know if there are any shortcuts to handle such Questions. Would you rate this problem a 700 + ??

First of all..+1 for the question. I got the right answer..but the only thing I felt eerie about this problem is that it has a lot of calculations to be done under the given timing constraints..Experts..please suggest something about the calculations this has. And what level would you classify this problem as.. _________________

A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Jul 2016, 20:41

Profit=Revenue-Cost

2007: -1000=R1-C1

2008: 0=(1+2X%)R1-(1+X%)C1

2009: P3=(1+2X%)^2*R1-(1+X%)^2*C1

we've already known that R3=1.44R1, so (1+2X%)^2=1.44, X=10

we put X=10 back to the equation of 2008: 0=1.2R1-1.1C1, and we have 1.2R1=1.1C1, which we could combine with the equation of 2007. Then we have C1=12000, R1-11000

Finally, take C1 and R1 into the equation of 2009 and we got P3=15840-14520=1320

Thanks,
_________________

It's better to burn out than to fade away.

gmatclubot

A firm's annual revenue grows twice as fast as its costs. In
[#permalink]
24 Jul 2016, 20:41

After days of waiting, sharing the tension with other applicants in forums, coming up with different theories about invites patterns, and, overall, refreshing my inbox every five minutes to...

I was totally freaking out. Apparently, most of the HBS invites were already sent and I didn’t get one. However, there are still some to come out on...

In early 2012, when I was working as a biomedical researcher at the National Institutes of Health , I decided that I wanted to get an MBA and make the...