Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A group of 3 integers is to be selected one after the other, [#permalink]
24 Nov 2011, 10:45

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

67% (02:40) correct
33% (02:27) wrong based on 48 sessions

List L: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

A group of 3 integers is to be selected one after the other, and at random and without replacement, from list L above. What is the probability that the 3 integers selected are not 3 consecutive integers?

A. 3/5 B. 7/10 C. 3/4 D. 4/5 E. 14/15

One way to do this is to count all the consecutive combinations and divide that by 10C3, subtract the whole thing from 1. But is there a more systematic and efficient way to do this problem? kaplan books only provide brute force solutions without any formulas. thanks.

Re: The most efficient way to do this probability question [#permalink]
24 Nov 2011, 11:36

1

This post received KUDOS

The method you suggested is the simplest. It's very easy to count the number of series 3 consecutive integers, especially since you don't need to do permutations. There are a total of 8 such series (1,2,3), (2,3,4)...(8,9,10).

Re: The most efficient way to do this probability question [#permalink]
24 Nov 2011, 21:54

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

topspin330 wrote:

List L: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

A group of 3 integers is to be selected one after the other, and at random and without replacement, from list L above. What is the probability that the 3 integers selected are not 3 consecutive integers?

a - 3/5 b - 7/10 c - 3/4 d - 4/5 e - 14/15

One way to do this is to count all the consecutive combinations and divide that by 10C3, subtract the whole thing from 1. But is there a more systematic and efficient way to do this problem? kaplan books only provide brute force solutions without any formulas. thanks.

There is a little bit of ambiguity in this question. When you read it, you wonder whether the order of selection is important i.e. should the numbers be selected in a consecutive manner i.e. are they looking for the probability of selecting 2, then 3 and then 4 or is this selection made in any other order e.g. 3, then 2 and then 4 fine too. You need to guess from the answer options that the order of selection is not important. In that case, the solution provided above is the best and fastest method.

In case the order of selection is important, the required probability = (8/10)*(1/9)*(1/8) = 1/90 i.e. you can select any of the first 8 integers first. Now both the second and the third pick are defined e.g. if you select 4 on your first pick, you need to select 5 next (probability of that = 1/9 since there are total 9 numbers left) and then you need to select 6 (probability of that = 1/8 since there are total 8 numbers left) _________________

Re: The most efficient way to do this probability question [#permalink]
25 Nov 2011, 04:39

As Karishma said , there is an ambiguity in the question. I guess one way to find the answer is to approach in both ways and check if only one answer is present among the answer choices.

If order of the consecutive numbers is not important , then answer would be 1- {8/10C3} or 1 - {8/120} or 14/15 If order of the consecutive numbers is important , then answer would be 1- {(8*3!)/10C3} or 1- {48/120} or 3/5.

In this case , both the answers are present in the answer choices ( ), so question needs to be little more clear. I don't think this kind of unclear question would ever come in actual GMAT . _________________

If Electricity comes from Electrons , Does Morality come from Morons ??

If you find my post useful ... then please give me kudos ......

Re: The most efficient way to do this probability question [#permalink]
27 Nov 2011, 22:44

Expert's post

Responding to a pm:

Wy do you restrict the first choice to 8 options?, the way I understand this problem you could pick any of the numbres 1 to 10 and then the next two would have constraints.

For example if my first pick is 10, my second 8 and my last pick is 9, wouldn't that set comply with being a set of consecutive numbers?

The point is 'does the order of picking numbers matter'. If only the end result is important i.e. you get three numbers which are consecutive, then the answer is different but if the order of selecting numbers is important too i.e. after 8, I must pick 9 and then 10, then the answer is different. The question would have been clearer if they had mentioned that three numbers are picked simultaneously. Then the order doesn't matter. When they say that the numbers are picked one after the other, it gets you thinking if the order of selection is important too. Anyway, the intention of the original question is what you suggested. I offered a different spin on it.

In fact, there are two different spins on the question.

When I restrict the first number to one of 1-8, I am assuming that they want the probability of 3 consecutive numbers picked in increasing order.

If you want to find the probability of 3 consecutive number picked in either increasing or decreasing order (say you pick 8, 9, 10 OR you pick 8, 7, 6 in that order), you do not need to have this restriction but you do need different cases. If you pick 1/2/9/10, the next two numbers can be chosen in only 1 way each. If you pick any other number, you can choose the next number in 2 ways and the third number in one way. Convert this logic into math and find out what you get. _________________

Re: The most efficient way to do this probability question [#permalink]
27 Dec 2011, 04:40

I just thought of another way to figure out the problem:

1.) Select any number: P1 10/10 2.) Select any number next to the first one: P2 2/9 3.) Select and number next to the first or second chosen one: P3 2/8

P1 * P2 * P3 = 1/18

1 - 1/18 = 17/18 .... this is closest to E. The only problem is that I can also chose numbers 1 and 10 which don't have two neighboring numbers.

Taking this into account will make it too difficult and long-lasting (at least for me)

Re: The most efficient way to do this probability question [#permalink]
07 Dec 2013, 00:14

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Type of Visa: You will be applying for a Non-Immigrant F-1 (Student) US Visa. Applying for a Visa: Create an account on: https://cgifederal.secure.force.com/?language=Englishcountry=India Complete...

I started running back in 2005. I finally conquered what seemed impossible. Not sure when I would be able to do full marathon, but this will do for now...