Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 10:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A group of children of various ages was read stories in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Expert Post
5 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2439
Followers: 310

Kudos [?]: 2602 [5] , given: 695

A group of children of various ages was read stories in [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2012, 06:57
5
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

61% (02:18) correct 39% (01:26) wrong based on 187 sessions
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.

In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.

Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.

The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment.

The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS
Quant: 1. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 2. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 3. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version
Verbal:1. Best EXTERNAL resources to tackle the GMAT Verbal Section 2. e-GMAT's ALL CR topics-Consolidated 3. New Critical Reasoning question bank by carcass 4. Meaning/Clarity SC Question Bank by Carcass_Souvik 5. e-GMAT's ALL SC topics-Consolidated-2nd Edition 6. The best reading to improve Reading Comprehension 7.Verbal question bank and Directories


Last edited by carcass on 10 Dec 2012, 12:37, edited 2 times in total.
Expert Post
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1425
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 128

Kudos [?]: 642 [0], given: 62

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2012, 07:29
Expert's post
Answer must be A.
D and E strengthen the argument.
A presents an alternate reason why the group of children gave random punishments. If it needs a high level of intellect to choose respective punishments, then the children were not capable enough to do so. We can't say that younger children do not regard people's intentions relevant to punishment. In other words A is an alternate cause.
C and B are nor relevant.
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 238
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 136 [1] , given: 63

Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2012, 07:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.


I got A by POE

E is the trap answer
The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.

we don't know the severity of the harm done we only have 2 options intentionally or accidentally.

Also if you use !A > B
if we negate A we can arrive at B

In interpreting these stories, the listeners had NOT drawn on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally

what happens if they are mature then they can use that as a basis for punishment.
Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2439
Followers: 310

Kudos [?]: 2602 [0], given: 695

Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2012, 12:37
Expert's post
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2281
Followers: 276

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2014, 23:54
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Apr 2014
Posts: 152
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 1474

Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2014, 20:46
Marcab wrote:
Answer must be A.
D and E strengthen the argument.
A presents an alternate reason why the group of children gave random punishments. If it needs a high level of intellect to choose respective punishments, then the children were not capable enough to do so. We can't say that younger children do not regard people's intentions relevant to punishment. In other words A is an alternate cause.
C and B are nor relevant.


Hi Marcab,
Can u please elaborate a lil more on A is weakening.What I can make out of it is that A says that since a high level of intellect is needed, younger kids are unable to decide on punishment, hence its supporting the argument! Please guide.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 May 2014
Posts: 96
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: HKUST '15, ISB '15
GMAT Date: 10-18-2014
GPA: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 31 [1] , given: 42

CAT Tests
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2014, 03:04
1
This post received
KUDOS
maggie27 wrote:
Marcab wrote:
Answer must be A.
D and E strengthen the argument.
A presents an alternate reason why the group of children gave random punishments. If it needs a high level of intellect to choose respective punishments, then the children were not capable enough to do so. We can't say that younger children do not regard people's intentions relevant to punishment. In other words A is an alternate cause.
C and B are nor relevant.


Hi Marcab,
Can u please elaborate a lil more on A is weakening.What I can make out of it is that A says that since a high level of intellect is needed, younger kids are unable to decide on punishment, hence its supporting the argument! Please guide.



A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Premise: Children read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally.When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones
Conclusion: Younger children do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Quote:
In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.

The option states that to interpret these stories, listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.Maturity comes with a age and children might not be mature enough to interpret these stories.

This undermines the conclusion because children didn't disregard the intentions in fact they couldn't understand the intentions of people i.e whether ppl did crimes intentionally or accidentally.


press kudos if it helps
_________________

Success has been and continues to be defined as Getting up one more time than you have been knocked down.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2013
Posts: 34
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2014, 05:21
VarunBhardwaj wrote:
maggie27 wrote:
Marcab wrote:
Answer must be A.
D and E strengthen the argument.
A presents an alternate reason why the group of children gave random punishments. If it needs a high level of intellect to choose respective punishments, then the children were not capable enough to do so. We can't say that younger children do not regard people's intentions relevant to punishment. In other words A is an alternate cause.
C and B are nor relevant.


Hi Marcab,
Can u please elaborate a lil more on A is weakening.What I can make out of it is that A says that since a high level of intellect is needed, younger kids are unable to decide on punishment, hence its supporting the argument! Please guide.



A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Premise: Children read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally.When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones
Conclusion: Younger children do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Quote:
In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.

The option states that to interpret these stories, listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.Maturity comes with a age and children might not be mature enough to interpret these stories.

This undermines the conclusion because children didn't disregard the intentions in fact they couldn't understand the intentions of people i.e whether ppl did crimes intentionally or accidentally.


press kudos if it helps



Through POE, I deduced that the answer, but not sure of the reason.....
Good Explanation!!!
Thank you very much.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2014
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 39

Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2014, 07:56
Thanks that really helped.
+1 Kudos for u.
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 665
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
WE: Business Development (Other)
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 316 [0], given: 670

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2014, 09:13
carcass wrote:
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.

In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.

Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.

The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment.

The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.



Good Question+1
Gmatprep questions are just awesome...

Clearly this is a Weaken question and the conclusion is that Younger children do not consider intent (whether accidental or intentional) of people while deciding a punishment..and why is that? Because the study showed that Younger people gave same punishment whether person's intent was accidental or intentional..

Gap in Logic : Younger children do not regard intent of the people (In Conclusion) where as facts presented tells about same punishment was given by younger people..irrespective of intent

A gives you the logic that it is not that younger children do not consider intent of the doer but just that they don't have enough knowledge to differentiate between harm produced intentionally or accidentally.. and thus an alternate reason for giving the same punishment..

For a weaken question...always consider the argument to be weak(When you are reading) and before going to answer try come with an answer on your own...Picking the correct answer choice becomes easier thereafter...
_________________


“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
Posts: 41
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 49

Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2014, 14:12
Agree with A.

I think C is out of scope.

D/E strengthen the argument.
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 665
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
WE: Business Development (Other)
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 316 [0], given: 670

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2014, 18:42
carcass wrote:
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.

In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.

Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.

The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment.

The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.



Hi Carcass,

Do you think there is error of Correlation -----> Causation being employed in this passage??

Same Punishment by Younger Children-------> Disregard for Intent whether accidental or intentional!!
_________________


“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in   [#permalink] 07 Oct 2014, 18:42
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A group of children of various ages was read stories in PUNEETSCHDV 1 24 Aug 2012, 00:05
4 Each child in a group of young children read aloud both a noboru 20 30 Oct 2010, 05:33
books to read for story brainstorming aviroop 4 02 Aug 2007, 12:23
A group of children of various ages was read stories in AK47 7 14 Jan 2007, 20:10
A group of children of various ages was read stories in sperinko 9 18 Aug 2006, 18:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A group of children of various ages was read stories in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.