A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Jan 2017, 01:40

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 768
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 626 [2] , given: 99

A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2010, 11:52
2
KUDOS
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:59) correct 32% (01:12) wrong based on 1053 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small teeth.

A using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million Years, explaining hominid features like
D fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.

I came down to B and D ( eliminated other choices based on 'like vs such as')

I am not sure how to choose between these two.

in B, it says "use of fire" ...
in D, "fire used" ... I thought both are fine ...

will post the OA soon.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by fameatop on 29 Aug 2013, 22:49, edited 1 time in total.
OA not Provided
If you have any questions
New!
Current Student
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 322
Schools: Yale SOM
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 23

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2010, 12:28
'could date' and 'could explain' need to be parallel. Also, 'such as having' is unnecessary. 'features' infers the hominid's have a large brain and small teeth.

VP
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1473
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 261 [1] , given: 31

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2010, 12:33
1
KUDOS
ugimba wrote:
A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small teeth.

A using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million Years, explaining hominid features like
D fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.

I came down to B and D ( eliminated other choices based on 'like vs such as')

I am not sure how to choose between these two.

in B, it says "use of fire" ...
in D, "fire used" ... I thought both are fine ...

will post the OA soon.

D makes it seem as if fire explains hominid features when it should be the use of fire to cook could date back and explain as in B

so B
Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 768
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 626 [0], given: 99

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2010, 12:56
lagomez wrote:
ugimba wrote:
A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small teeth.

A using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million Years, explaining hominid features like
D fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.

I came down to B and D ( eliminated other choices based on 'like vs such as')

I am not sure how to choose between these two.

in B, it says "use of fire" ...
in D, "fire used" ... I thought both are fine ...

will post the OA soon.

D makes it seem as if fire explains hominid features when it should be the use of fire to cook could date back and explain as in B

so B

thanks ... this explanation is perfect.. I guess in the time pressure I missed this point. I should have spent few more secs to see this error as to who is doing the 'modifier'...

OA is B.

+1 for ya.
Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 197
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2010, 15:09
B
for the reason... consistent usage of verb form... use, date, explain,
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 954
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 1273 [1] , given: 40

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2010, 23:33
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Though I marked the correct OA, but it took me 3:28 min to make out the meaning.
I marked B for:
1. could date....could explain
2. the use of fire to cook food - (a noun phrase) is a method which can be traced back not the fire
3. such hominid features as Vs like

I hope in the real GMAT such questions are not for me
_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Last edited by ykaiim on 10 Jun 2010, 23:37, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Location: Singapore
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 749 [0], given: 36

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2010, 23:35
LOL ykaiim. I am sure 750+ is on the way on 24th.

ykaiim wrote:
Though I marked the correct OA, but it took me 3:28 min to make out the meaning.

I hope in the real GMAT such questions are not for me

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Manager
Status: Impossible is just an opinion
Joined: 31 Oct 2012
Posts: 55
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V24
GMAT 2: 650 Q47 V34
GMAT 3: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 4: 690 Q48 V37
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Consumer Products)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 18

Re: A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2013, 03:50
ugimba wrote:
A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small teeth.

A using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million Years, explaining hominid features like
D fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.

I came down to B and D ( eliminated other choices based on 'like vs such as')

I am not sure how to choose between these two.

in B, it says "use of fire" ...
in D, "fire used" ... I thought both are fine ...

will post the OA soon.

B is perfectly ok for me, but shouldn't we use DATE AT idiom => the use of fire to cook food could date back AT almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 344
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 12

Re: A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2013, 15:48
ugimba wrote:
A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small teeth.

A using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million Years, explaining hominid features like
D fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.

I came down to B and D ( eliminated other choices based on 'like vs such as')

I am not sure how to choose between these two.

in B, it says "use of fire" ...
in D, "fire used" ... I thought both are fine ...

will post the OA soon.

Generally speaking you can eliminate A because it uses 'it' and i can't find any antecedent for it.
In D and E are not correct because of it'e meaning fire used . What does this mean. Some other fire was being used millions of years ago or what ?
I eliminated C because Like can't be used to give examples so B is the answer. Notice B has everything going fot it.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 638
Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 98

Kudos [?]: 538 [0], given: 80

Re: A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2014, 12:59
To keep things Simple, Just consider what can be dated back ? the use or the fire?
Of course the use can be dated back so and so years ago. B explicitly says that. A is a montstrocity and can never be correct on the exam
_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Intern
Joined: 26 Dec 2014
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2014, 07:46
A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small
teeth.

A. using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having

B. the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as

C. cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million years, explaining hominid features like

D. fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years, explaining hominid features such as having

E. fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like
Manager
Joined: 22 Oct 2014
Posts: 88
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 3.8
WE: General Management (Consulting)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2014, 09:09
There is a 3/2 split in the use of the verb be dated/date. The option date back, seems to point to the fact that fire has been used for cooking for almost two million years, not that scientists now can date back the use almost two million years back. It therefore distorts the meaning and can be excluded. E sounds awkward, so the original version remains.

_________________

$$\sqrt{-1}$$ $$2^3$$ $$\Sigma$$ $$\pi$$ ... and it was delicious!

Please consider giving +1 Kudos if deserved!

Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 110
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.34
WE: General Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2014, 09:26
1
KUDOS
littlewarthog wrote:
There is a 3/2 split in the use of the verb be dated/date. The option date back, seems to point to the fact that fire has been used for cooking for almost two million years, not that scientists now can date back the use almost two million years back. It therefore distorts the meaning and can be excluded. E sounds awkward, so the original version remains.

E isn't just awkward, it has a nonsensical meaning:

fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like

implies: fires used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years (okay), and fire used for cooking food could explain hominid features (what?). It's not the fires that could explain hominid features, it's the USE of fires could explain the features.

A. using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
It has no clear antecedent, "could be dated back" is less wordy and less clear than other option

B. the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
Seems ok, hold it.

C. cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million years, explaining hominid features like
use of "like" to introduce examples isn't the best.

D. fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years, explaining hominid features such as having
Distorted meaning: fire is explaining hominid features?

E. fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features
Distorted meaning (see above).

Pick B.
Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2014
Posts: 61
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 120 [1] , given: 6

Re: A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2015, 10:32
1
KUDOS
[quote="ugimba"]A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small teeth.

A using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million Years, explaining hominid features like
D fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.

Can someone explain which is right.

1. could date back almost two million years
2. could date back to almost two million Years

daagh
Manager
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 116
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 48

Re: A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2015, 18:14
Request you not to post ur analysis in question window. please post all such things in next posts.
Intern
Joined: 28 Jul 2015
Posts: 31
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 102

Re: A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2015, 06:37
Hi,

I thought "to" is compulsory and marked "C" though I have noted "like/such as".
1. could date back almost two million years
2. could date back to almost two million Years

Which of these 2 is right?

Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2015
Posts: 65
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 89

Re: A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2015, 12:05
Comes down to B& D. Rest use "like". D means to say that the fire was 2 million years old. hence B
VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1402
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 813

Re: A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2015, 19:32
ugimba wrote:
A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small teeth.

A using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million Years, explaining hominid features like
D fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.

I came down to B and D ( eliminated other choices based on 'like vs such as')

I am not sure how to choose between these two.

in B, it says "use of fire" ...
in D, "fire used" ... I thought both are fine ...

will post the OA soon.

forget grammar rules and instead focus on meaning
in d and e, fire explain. not logic
features like having: not logic, not clear . d and a are gone

such as is more logic than like. c is out
Intern
Joined: 18 Apr 2011
Posts: 49
Location: United States
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 51

Re: A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2016, 07:22
ugimba wrote:
A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small teeth.

A using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million Years, explaining hominid features like
D fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.

I came down to B and D ( eliminated other choices based on 'like vs such as')

I am not sure how to choose between these two.

in B, it says "use of fire" ...
in D, "fire used" ... I thought both are fine ...

will post the OA soon.

The sentence wants to say that, the use of fire to cook may date back to 2 million years
Now looking at the options - A is wrong - awkward, long and confusing phrase, hence ruling out.

Can't be D for sure, as D says the fire used to cook..., which essentially signifies that the fire dates back to 2 million years!!!
So D is out, hence remaining option is B
If you notice, other options also highlight the fire to cook dates back thing
SVP
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2225
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 560 Q42 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 3: 560 Q43 V24
GMAT 4: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 140

Re: A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2016, 17:52
ugimba wrote:
A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small teeth.

A using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million Years, explaining hominid features like
D fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.

clearly we need such as, as we give examples of the features. A, C, and E are out right away.
between B and D:
X proposed that the USE could date back
X proposed that FIRE could date back
clearly we need to link the usage of fire to smth, not the fire itself.
D is out, and B stands.
+one more thing with D - ing modifier is incorrect.
fire could date back to almost 2 mln years:
1 the result is explaining homid features...
2. date back by explaining...
since both usages are incorrect, ing modifier is not correct.

B
Re: A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to   [#permalink] 31 Mar 2016, 17:52

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
10 While some economists propose that agricultural land be used 15 14 Jun 2014, 14:15
2 According to anthropologists, the use of human language 6 20 Oct 2012, 08:53
7 A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to 4 08 Jun 2012, 06:39
2 According to anthropologists, the use of human language 8 20 Feb 2010, 23:27
The city has proposed a number of water treatment and 3 29 May 2007, 18:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by