Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 May 2013, 04:19
Customize  |  Hide

A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 775
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [1] , given: 99

GMAT Tests User
A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2010, 12:52
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00

Question Stats:

70% (01:56) correct 29% (00:49) wrong based on 1 sessions
A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small teeth.

A using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million Years, explaining hominid features like
D fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.

I came down to B and D ( eliminated other choices based on 'like vs such as')

I am not sure how to choose between these two.

in B, it says "use of fire" ...
in D, "fire used" ... I thought both are fine ...

will post the OA soon.
Current Student
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 322
Schools: Yale SOM
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 23

GMAT Tests User
Re: Harvard anthropologist [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2010, 13:28
'could date' and 'could explain' need to be parallel. Also, 'such as having' is unnecessary. 'features' infers the hominid's have a large brain and small teeth.

Hence, IMO, answer is B.
1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1489
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 164 [1] , given: 31

GMAT Tests User
Re: Harvard anthropologist [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2010, 13:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
ugimba wrote:
A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small teeth.

A using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million Years, explaining hominid features like
D fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.

I came down to B and D ( eliminated other choices based on 'like vs such as')

I am not sure how to choose between these two.

in B, it says "use of fire" ...
in D, "fire used" ... I thought both are fine ...

will post the OA soon.


answer B?

D makes it seem as if fire explains hominid features when it should be the use of fire to cook could date back and explain as in B

so B
Director
Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 775
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 99

GMAT Tests User
Re: Harvard anthropologist [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2010, 13:56
lagomez wrote:
ugimba wrote:
A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and small teeth.

A using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million Years, explaining hominid features like
D fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.

I came down to B and D ( eliminated other choices based on 'like vs such as')

I am not sure how to choose between these two.

in B, it says "use of fire" ...
in D, "fire used" ... I thought both are fine ...

will post the OA soon.


answer B?

D makes it seem as if fire explains hominid features when it should be the use of fire to cook could date back and explain as in B

so B


thanks ... this explanation is perfect.. I guess in the time pressure I missed this point. I should have spent few more secs to see this error as to who is doing the 'modifier'...

OA is B.

+1 for ya.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 198
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: Harvard anthropologist [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2010, 16:09
B
for the reason... consistent usage of verb form... use, date, explain,
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 959
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 38

Kudos [?]: 556 [0], given: 40

GMAT Tests User
Re: Harvard anthropologist [#permalink] New post 11 Jun 2010, 00:33
Though I marked the correct OA, but it took me 3:28 min to make out the meaning.
I marked B for:
1. could date....could explain
2. the use of fire to cook food - (a noun phrase) is a method which can be traced back not the fire
3. such hominid features as Vs like


I hope in the real GMAT such questions are not for me :)
_________________

Want to improve your CR: cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: 50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html


Last edited by ykaiim on 11 Jun 2010, 00:37, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 271 [0], given: 36

GMAT Tests User
Re: Harvard anthropologist [#permalink] New post 11 Jun 2010, 00:35
LOL ykaiim. I am sure 750+ is on the way on 24th.

ykaiim wrote:
Though I marked the correct OA, but it took me 3:28 min to make out the meaning.

I hope in the real GMAT such questions are not for me :)

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Re: Harvard anthropologist   [#permalink] 11 Jun 2010, 00:35
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to KC 8 21 Oct 2006, 17:01
New posts According to anthropologists, the use of human language gmat_march 2 23 Jun 2007, 13:36
New posts 2 According to anthropologists, the use of human language vscid 8 21 Feb 2010, 00:27
New posts A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to ranjeet75 2 08 Jun 2012, 07:39
New posts 2 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC According to anthropologists, the use of human language nitzz 4 20 Oct 2012, 09:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.