a hell of inequality : Quant Question Archive [LOCKED]
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 18 Jan 2017, 03:31

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# a hell of inequality

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 06:30
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

SOLVE |3x-2|<=|2x-5|
Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 94
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: a hell of inequality [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 07:03
boubi wrote:
SOLVE |3x-2|<=|2x-5|

3X-2X <= -5+2
X <= -3

To test it, I tried a couple a couple of answers, and it seems like -3 is in fact the breaking point.
Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 07:16
that is not the right answer...
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 121
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 07:28
7/5 works too.

Kevin is right, ans is between -3 and 7/5.
Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 07:37
post calculation and reasoning
Director
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 549
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 07:38
i got 2/3<x<5/2 .. OA?
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 121
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 07:43
boubi wrote:
post calculation and reasoning

Well, in this case we have 4 different inequalities + <= +, -<=-, +<=-, -<=+.

The first 2 give us x=-3, the others give us x=7/5. This must be our range.
What's the A?
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 384
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: a hell of inequality [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 10:28
boubi wrote:
SOLVE |3x-2|<=|2x-5|

Let me tell u a faster way to solve such problems where both sides of the ineq has abs values.
Simply square both sides and solve the quadratic eqn.

You will get (x+3)*(x - 7/5) <= 0
which give -3 <= x <= 7/5
Director
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 743
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 11:02
SOLVE |3x-2|<2x>= 7/5; x <= -3

Impossible or an empty set.
Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: a hell of inequality [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 14:00
dahcrap wrote:
boubi wrote:
SOLVE |3x-2|<=|2x-5|

Let me tell u a faster way to solve such problems where both sides of the ineq has abs values.
Simply square both sides and solve the quadratic eqn.

You will get (x+3)*(x - 7/5) <= 0
which give -3 <= x <= 7/5

right on the spot, just need to square both sides
OA IS x E [-3;7/5]

dahcrap how did you come up from 5X^2+8X-16 to (X+3)*(X - 7/5)?
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 384
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: a hell of inequality [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 14:16
boubi wrote:
dahcrap wrote:
boubi wrote:
SOLVE |3x-2|<=|2x-5|

Let me tell u a faster way to solve such problems where both sides of the ineq has abs values.
Simply square both sides and solve the quadratic eqn.

You will get (x+3)*(x - 7/5) <= 0
which give -3 <= x <= 7/5

right on the spot, just need to square both sides
OA IS x E [-3;7/5]

dahcrap how did you come up from 5X^2+8X-16 to (X+3)*(X - 7/5)?

For this use

[-b +- sqrt(b^2 - 4ac)]/2a
where b = 8, c =16, a=5
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 97
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 14:20
(3x-2)^2 <= (2x-5)^2
9x^2 -12x + 4 <= 4x^2 -20x + 25
Moving everything to LHS:
5x^2+ 8x - 21 <= 0

Factoring above inequation, you get the correct answer per dahcrap.
It is a good method for solving when two absolutes are involved
Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 14:20
sooo you didn't escaped the hard way !!! we ggot to find some less fastidious wayy!!
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 384
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 14:24
boubi wrote:
:lol: sooo you didn't escaped the hard way !!! we ggot to find some less fastidious wayy!!

No way in hell for THIS problem
SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1797
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 149 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 14:36
|3x-2|<=|2x-5|

First of all, we have to see for which values each absolute is equal to 0. This will provide us the interval to study.

o 3x-2 = 0
<=> x = 2/3

o 2*x - 5 = 0
<=> x = 5/2

So, we must study the inequality with :
o x < 2/3
o 2/3 < x < 5/2
o x > 5/2

o If x =< 2/3, then
|3x-2|<=|2x-5|
<=> -(3*x-2) <= -(2*x-5)
<=> 3*x - 2 >= 2*x-5
<=> x >= -3 >>>> thus, -3 =< x =< 2/3 is an interval of solutions

o If 2/3 < x < 5/2, then
|3x-2|<=|2x-5|
<=> (3*x-2) <= -(2*x-5)
<=> 5*x <= 7
<=> x <= 7/5 >>>> thus, 2/3 < x <= 7/5 is an interval of solutions

o If x >= 5/2, then
|3x-2|<=|2x-5|
<=> (3*x-2) <= (2*x-5)
<=> x <= -3 >>>> Impossible as x >= 5/2.... No interval of solutions here.

Finally, we have, by unioning the 2 intervals:
-3 <= x <= 7/5
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 97
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 14:40
When more than two absolutes are present though, it becomes complicated to use the squaring approach. Another method seems to work better. I'll briefly solve your given problem using this other method.

|3x-2| <= |2x-5|

1. First you find the pivotal/critical points:
i.e.
a. you set 3x-2 = 0, so x = 2/3
b. you set 2x-5 = 0, so x = 5/2

2. If you take the 2 values, 2/3 and 5/2 on the number line, you get three domains
a. left of 2/3
b. b/w 2/3 and 5/2
c. right of 5/2

Next, you modify the intial inequation for these three domains, by taking out the modulus signs.

a. So, for x < 2/3 the inequation becomes,
-3x+2 <= -2x +5
(since both terms become negative for x < 2/3, you reverse their signs)
-3 <= x

b. For x b/w 2/3 and 5/2
3x -2 <= -2x + 5
(since 2x-5 becomes negative for x b/w 2/3 and 5/2, you reverse its sign)
or x <= 7/5

c. For x > 5/2
3x-2 <= 2x-5
x <= -3 (not valid since x is assumed to be > 5/2 above)

Combining the above three results, you get
-3 <= x <= 7/5
------------------

Credit for this method goes to user "Fig" who has posted several problems/solutions using this approach. Please search and look at all those problems if you have any questions. Manhattan GMAT also uses this approach.

Last edited by oops on 13 Jul 2007, 21:09, edited 1 time in total.
SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1797
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 149 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 14:43
oops wrote:
When more than two absolutes are present though, it becomes complicated to use the squaring approach. Another method seems to work better. I'll briefly solve your given problem using this other method.

|3x-2| <= |2x-5|

1. First you find the pivotal/critical points:
i.e.
a. you set 3x-2 = 0, so x = 2/3
b. you set 2x-5 = 0, so x = 5/2

2. If you take the 2 values, 2/3 and 5/2 on the number line, you get three domains
a. left of 2/3
b. b/w 2/3 and 5/2
c. right of 5/2

Next, you modify the intial inequation for these three domains, by taking out the modulus signs.

a. So, for x < 2/3 the inequation becomes,
-3x+2 <= -2x +5
(since both terms become negative for x < 2/3, you reverse their signs)
-3 <= x

b. For x b/w 2/3 and 5/2
3x -2 <= -2x + 5
(since 2x-5 becomes negative for x b/w 2/3 and 5/2, you reverse its sign)
or x <7> 5/2
3x-2 <= 2x-5
x <3> 5/2 above)

Combining the above three results, you get
-3 <= x <= 7/5
------------------

Credit for this method goes to user "Fig" who has posted several problems/solutions using this approach. Please search and look at all those problems if you have any questions. Manhattan GMAT also uses this approach.

Well ... Finally, I should not post ... All is in your post :D
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 97
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 14:48
Gosh, Fig (master of absolutes!), didn't see you also responded to this mesg - we must've been typing it up simultaneously - credit goes to you - glad to see you back...
Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 14:54
Fig master of absolutes!! that is the least we can expect from an MBA HEC
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 97
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2007, 15:04
For example, here is a question using more than two absolutes. It is from Manhattan GMAT (will post their soln later).

Question
Which of the following sets includes ALL of the solutions of x that will satisfy the equation: ?
|x-2| - |x-3| = |x-5|

1. {-6, -5, 0, 1, 7, 8|
2. { -4, -2, 0, 10/3, 4, 5}
3. {-4, 0, 1, 4, 5, 6}
4. {-1, 10/3, 3, 5, 6, 8}
5. {-2, -1, 1, 3, 4, 5}
13 Jul 2007, 15:04

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 28 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# a hell of inequality

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.