Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 06 Jul 2015, 05:43

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an [#permalink]  26 Jun 2007, 05:58
A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would give a profit to the dealer of 40 percent of the original cost. What was the original cost of the bracelet?
(1) After reducing this asking price by 10 percent, the jewelry dealer sold the bracelet at a profit of $403. (2) The jewelry dealer sold the bracelet for$1,953.
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 348
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Re: food for thought! [#permalink]  26 Jun 2007, 06:08
AugiTh wrote:
A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would give a profit to the dealer of 40 percent of the original cost. What was the original cost of the bracelet?
(1) After reducing this asking price by 10 percent, the jewelry dealer sold the bracelet at a profit of $403. (2) The jewelry dealer sold the bracelet for$1,953.

Shouldn't this be D? Or am I missing a trick?
Director
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 591
Location: Kuwait
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  26 Jun 2007, 06:18
S: selling price
R: original price

questions gives 1.4R = S
Profit = S-R = 1.4R-R = 0.4R which is the 40% profit.

(1) 0.9S - R = 403
----------------------
two equations, two unkowns --> can solve for both R and S

statement 1 is sufficient

(2) S = 1953
----------------
1.4R = 1953 .. you do the math by solving for R and finding the profit with 0.4xR

statemenet 2 is sufficient

ANSWER: D
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  26 Jun 2007, 07:33
I too thought ít was 'D'. The given ans is 'A'.

But then when I take the time and do the calculation, I do not get the same ans for statement1 and statement2.

For a choice to be 'D', isnt it necessary that both the statements should give the same answer? I based my aproach to this problem with this assumption and I did not get the same ans. Hence I was a lil confused.
It would be nice if someone could clarify this.
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 348
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  26 Jun 2007, 07:35
AugiTh wrote:
I too thought ít was 'D'. The given ans is 'A'.

But then when I take the time and do the calculation, I do not get the same ans for statement1 and statement2.

For a choice to be 'D', isnt it necessary that both the statements should give the same answer? I based my aproach to this problem with this assumption and I did not get the same ans. Hence I was a lil confused.
It would be nice if someone could clarify this.

You're right. For DS questions it should be sufficient to be able to answer the question. It is not necessary to get the 'right' answer. And if we get different answers with each statement, why can't we choose B instead of A ??
Director
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 545
Schools: MIT Sloan
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  26 Jun 2007, 10:48
I got A.

this was the reason I omitted B - it just says that he sold it for X$, but we are not told that he managed to sell it as his proposed selling price ! for all we know, he could have altered his selling price and sold it CIO Joined: 09 Mar 2003 Posts: 463 Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0 [#permalink] 26 Jun 2007, 12:25 sumande wrote: AugiTh wrote: I too thought ít was 'D'. The given ans is 'A'. But then when I take the time and do the calculation, I do not get the same ans for statement1 and statement2. For a choice to be 'D', isnt it necessary that both the statements should give the same answer? I based my aproach to this problem with this assumption and I did not get the same ans. Hence I was a lil confused. It would be nice if someone could clarify this. You're right. For DS questions it should be sufficient to be able to answer the question. It is not necessary to get the 'right' answer. And if we get different answers with each statement, why can't we choose B instead of A ?? Let me clarify this point... it's one of my personal favorites with the GMAT. The answer is DEFINITELY A. On the GMAT, the DS statements WILL ALWAYS have the same answer. In fact, they do have the same answer in this case, too. If you do the math in statement 1, you will find that he did, in fact, sell it for$1953.

But you can't possibly know HOW he got to that price using number 2 alone. You can't know if he gave a discount, or not. That's why it's not enough information.

But, you say, who cares? Even without that info, I can still get AN answer.

Yes, but the question says specifically that he INITIALLY offered the bracelet for a certain profit percentage. If that's the case, we have no way of knowing what he ACTUALLY offered the bracelet for.

Now this is the real kicker. You should know that from the first statement. I'm not saying the answer to the question should be C. But I am saying you should see the entire data sufficiency question, statements included, as information. If, in statement 1, you are told that he reduced his price, it should prompt you to ask yourself in statement two, "Hey, I know he reduced his price before, and this must be the same price, because that's how the GMAT works, so what does that mean? Oh, I see the word "initially" in the stem. It all makes sense now - this isn't enough info".

Just my two cents.
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  26 Jun 2007, 13:14
ian7777 wrote:
sumande wrote:
AugiTh wrote:
I too thought ít was 'D'. The given ans is 'A'.

But then when I take the time and do the calculation, I do not get the same ans for statement1 and statement2.

For a choice to be 'D', isnt it necessary that both the statements should give the same answer? I based my aproach to this problem with this assumption and I did not get the same ans. Hence I was a lil confused.
It would be nice if someone could clarify this.

You're right. For DS questions it should be sufficient to be able to answer the question. It is not necessary to get the 'right' answer. And if we get different answers with each statement, why can't we choose B instead of A ??

Let me clarify this point... it's one of my personal favorites with the GMAT.

The answer is DEFINITELY A. On the GMAT, the DS statements WILL ALWAYS have the same answer.

In fact, they do have the same answer in this case, too. If you do the math in statement 1, you will find that he did, in fact, sell it for $1953. But you can't possibly know HOW he got to that price using number 2 alone. You can't know if he gave a discount, or not. That's why it's not enough information. But, you say, who cares? Even without that info, I can still get AN answer. Yes, but the question says specifically that he INITIALLY offered the bracelet for a certain profit percentage. If that's the case, we have no way of knowing what he ACTUALLY offered the bracelet for. Now this is the real kicker. You should know that from the first statement. I'm not saying the answer to the question should be C. But I am saying you should see the entire data sufficiency question, statements included, as information. If, in statement 1, you are told that he reduced his price, it should prompt you to ask yourself in statement two, "Hey, I know he reduced his price before, and this must be the same price, because that's how the GMAT works, so what does that mean? Oh, I see the word "initially" in the stem. It all makes sense now - this isn't enough info". Just my two cents. thanks ian...that was quite elaborate worth more than 2 cents Senior Manager Joined: 04 Jun 2007 Posts: 348 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0 [#permalink] 26 Jun 2007, 19:55 ian7777 wrote: sumande wrote: AugiTh wrote: I too thought ít was 'D'. The given ans is 'A'. But then when I take the time and do the calculation, I do not get the same ans for statement1 and statement2. For a choice to be 'D', isnt it necessary that both the statements should give the same answer? I based my aproach to this problem with this assumption and I did not get the same ans. Hence I was a lil confused. It would be nice if someone could clarify this. You're right. For DS questions it should be sufficient to be able to answer the question. It is not necessary to get the 'right' answer. And if we get different answers with each statement, why can't we choose B instead of A ?? Let me clarify this point... it's one of my personal favorites with the GMAT. The answer is DEFINITELY A. On the GMAT, the DS statements WILL ALWAYS have the same answer. In fact, they do have the same answer in this case, too. If you do the math in statement 1, you will find that he did, in fact, sell it for$1953.

But you can't possibly know HOW he got to that price using number 2 alone. You can't know if he gave a discount, or not. That's why it's not enough information.

But, you say, who cares? Even without that info, I can still get AN answer.

Yes, but the question says specifically that he INITIALLY offered the bracelet for a certain profit percentage. If that's the case, we have no way of knowing what he ACTUALLY offered the bracelet for.

Now this is the real kicker. You should know that from the first statement. I'm not saying the answer to the question should be C. But I am saying you should see the entire data sufficiency question, statements included, as information. If, in statement 1, you are told that he reduced his price, it should prompt you to ask yourself in statement two, "Hey, I know he reduced his price before, and this must be the same price, because that's how the GMAT works, so what does that mean? Oh, I see the word "initially" in the stem. It all makes sense now - this isn't enough info".

Just my two cents.

Thanks for the information...will try to remember all this...
[#permalink] 26 Jun 2007, 19:55
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Help Offered 0 04 Mar 2010, 18:44
There are 5 cars in a car dealer and 5 keys. The sales 4 30 Jul 2008, 00:46
According to a car dealer's sales report, 1/3 of the cars 4 19 Apr 2008, 16:51
A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an 2 28 Nov 2007, 14:19
A furniture dealer purchased a desk for \$150 and then set 2 17 Nov 2006, 10:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.