Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an [#permalink]
26 Jun 2007, 05:58

A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would give a profit to the dealer of 40 percent of the original cost. What was the original cost of the bracelet?
(1) After reducing this asking price by 10 percent, the jewelry dealer sold the bracelet at a profit of $403.
(2) The jewelry dealer sold the bracelet for $1,953.

Re: food for thought! [#permalink]
26 Jun 2007, 06:08

AugiTh wrote:

A jewelry dealer initially offered a bracelet for sale at an asking price that would give a profit to the dealer of 40 percent of the original cost. What was the original cost of the bracelet? (1) After reducing this asking price by 10 percent, the jewelry dealer sold the bracelet at a profit of $403. (2) The jewelry dealer sold the bracelet for $1,953.

But then when I take the time and do the calculation, I do not get the same ans for statement1 and statement2.

For a choice to be 'D', isnt it necessary that both the statements should give the same answer? I based my aproach to this problem with this assumption and I did not get the same ans. Hence I was a lil confused.
It would be nice if someone could clarify this.

But then when I take the time and do the calculation, I do not get the same ans for statement1 and statement2.

For a choice to be 'D', isnt it necessary that both the statements should give the same answer? I based my aproach to this problem with this assumption and I did not get the same ans. Hence I was a lil confused. It would be nice if someone could clarify this.

You're right. For DS questions it should be sufficient to be able to answer the question. It is not necessary to get the 'right' answer. And if we get different answers with each statement, why can't we choose B instead of A ??

But then when I take the time and do the calculation, I do not get the same ans for statement1 and statement2.

For a choice to be 'D', isnt it necessary that both the statements should give the same answer? I based my aproach to this problem with this assumption and I did not get the same ans. Hence I was a lil confused. It would be nice if someone could clarify this.

You're right. For DS questions it should be sufficient to be able to answer the question. It is not necessary to get the 'right' answer. And if we get different answers with each statement, why can't we choose B instead of A ??

Let me clarify this point... it's one of my personal favorites with the GMAT.

The answer is DEFINITELY A. On the GMAT, the DS statements WILL ALWAYS have the same answer.

In fact, they do have the same answer in this case, too. If you do the math in statement 1, you will find that he did, in fact, sell it for $1953.

But you can't possibly know HOW he got to that price using number 2 alone. You can't know if he gave a discount, or not. That's why it's not enough information.

But, you say, who cares? Even without that info, I can still get AN answer.

Yes, but the question says specifically that he INITIALLY offered the bracelet for a certain profit percentage. If that's the case, we have no way of knowing what he ACTUALLY offered the bracelet for.

Now this is the real kicker. You should know that from the first statement. I'm not saying the answer to the question should be C. But I am saying you should see the entire data sufficiency question, statements included, as information. If, in statement 1, you are told that he reduced his price, it should prompt you to ask yourself in statement two, "Hey, I know he reduced his price before, and this must be the same price, because that's how the GMAT works, so what does that mean? Oh, I see the word "initially" in the stem. It all makes sense now - this isn't enough info".

But then when I take the time and do the calculation, I do not get the same ans for statement1 and statement2.

For a choice to be 'D', isnt it necessary that both the statements should give the same answer? I based my aproach to this problem with this assumption and I did not get the same ans. Hence I was a lil confused. It would be nice if someone could clarify this.

You're right. For DS questions it should be sufficient to be able to answer the question. It is not necessary to get the 'right' answer. And if we get different answers with each statement, why can't we choose B instead of A ??

Let me clarify this point... it's one of my personal favorites with the GMAT.

The answer is DEFINITELY A. On the GMAT, the DS statements WILL ALWAYS have the same answer.

In fact, they do have the same answer in this case, too. If you do the math in statement 1, you will find that he did, in fact, sell it for $1953.

But you can't possibly know HOW he got to that price using number 2 alone. You can't know if he gave a discount, or not. That's why it's not enough information.

But, you say, who cares? Even without that info, I can still get AN answer.

Yes, but the question says specifically that he INITIALLY offered the bracelet for a certain profit percentage. If that's the case, we have no way of knowing what he ACTUALLY offered the bracelet for.

Now this is the real kicker. You should know that from the first statement. I'm not saying the answer to the question should be C. But I am saying you should see the entire data sufficiency question, statements included, as information. If, in statement 1, you are told that he reduced his price, it should prompt you to ask yourself in statement two, "Hey, I know he reduced his price before, and this must be the same price, because that's how the GMAT works, so what does that mean? Oh, I see the word "initially" in the stem. It all makes sense now - this isn't enough info".

Just my two cents.

thanks ian...that was quite elaborate worth more than 2 cents

But then when I take the time and do the calculation, I do not get the same ans for statement1 and statement2.

For a choice to be 'D', isnt it necessary that both the statements should give the same answer? I based my aproach to this problem with this assumption and I did not get the same ans. Hence I was a lil confused. It would be nice if someone could clarify this.

You're right. For DS questions it should be sufficient to be able to answer the question. It is not necessary to get the 'right' answer. And if we get different answers with each statement, why can't we choose B instead of A ??

Let me clarify this point... it's one of my personal favorites with the GMAT.

The answer is DEFINITELY A. On the GMAT, the DS statements WILL ALWAYS have the same answer.

In fact, they do have the same answer in this case, too. If you do the math in statement 1, you will find that he did, in fact, sell it for $1953.

But you can't possibly know HOW he got to that price using number 2 alone. You can't know if he gave a discount, or not. That's why it's not enough information.

But, you say, who cares? Even without that info, I can still get AN answer.

Yes, but the question says specifically that he INITIALLY offered the bracelet for a certain profit percentage. If that's the case, we have no way of knowing what he ACTUALLY offered the bracelet for.

Now this is the real kicker. You should know that from the first statement. I'm not saying the answer to the question should be C. But I am saying you should see the entire data sufficiency question, statements included, as information. If, in statement 1, you are told that he reduced his price, it should prompt you to ask yourself in statement two, "Hey, I know he reduced his price before, and this must be the same price, because that's how the GMAT works, so what does that mean? Oh, I see the word "initially" in the stem. It all makes sense now - this isn't enough info".

Just my two cents.

Thanks for the information...will try to remember all this...

How the growth of emerging markets will strain global finance : Emerging economies need access to capital (i.e., finance) in order to fund the projects necessary for...

One question I get a lot from prospective students is what to do in the summer before the MBA program. Like a lot of folks from non traditional backgrounds...