Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 22:20

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A law passed in Rockville three years ago allows a 30% tax

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 243
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 8

A law passed in Rockville three years ago allows a 30% tax [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2011, 11:50
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (01:40) correct 45% (01:11) wrong based on 42 sessions
A law passed in Rockville three years ago allows a 30% tax credit to consumers who purchase a newly constructed home. The tax credit was intended to stimulate the local economy by creating a higher demand for new houses and spurring the creation of jobs in construction and design. However, since the law was passed, the growth in sales of newly constructed homes has dropped each year, from 15% to 10% to 5%. Obviously, this law has had little or no effect on the sale of newly constructed homes.

Which of the following must be true if the above conclusion is to be properly drawn?

New house sales are directly tied to personal income.
New house sales cannot increase by more than 6% next year.
If the tax credit had been 50%, there would have been a larger increase in new house sales
Without the tax credit, new house sales would not have been significantly lower.
Tax credits for specific purchases are usually ineffective in influencing consumers to make those purchases.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 570
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 13

Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2011, 12:14
bschool83 wrote:
A law passed in Rockville three years ago allows a 30% tax credit to consumers who purchase a newly constructed home. The tax credit was intended to stimulate the local economy by creating a higher demand for new houses and spurring the creation of jobs in construction and design. However, since the law was passed, the growth in sales of newly constructed homes has dropped each year, from 15% to 10% to 5%. Obviously, this law has had little or no effect on the sale of newly constructed homes.

Which of the following must be true if the above conclusion is to be properly drawn?

New house sales are directly tied to personal income.
New house sales cannot increase by more than 6% next year.
If the tax credit had been 50%, there would have been a larger increase in new house sales
Without the tax credit, new house sales would not have been significantly lower.
Tax credits for specific purchases are usually ineffective in influencing consumers to make those purchases.


D it is
we need an answer that says the drop wouldn't have been even worse without the tax credit
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 May 2010
Posts: 301
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 7

Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2011, 06:21
I say D. The author is assuming that without the tax credit, the sales would have been similar, not worse than the sales figure now.
_________________

If you like my post, consider giving me KUDOS!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2010
Posts: 161
Location: Banaglore
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 8

Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2011, 23:53
Can some one please explain why E is incorrect?
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: Applying in Round 2
Joined: 17 Mar 2011
Posts: 23
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
Schools: Stern '14
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [1] , given: 28

Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink] New post 20 Jul 2011, 21:22
1
This post received
KUDOS
A law passed in Rockville three years ago allows a 30% tax credit to consumers who purchase a newly constructed home. The tax credit was intended to stimulate the local economy by creating a higher demand for new houses and spurring the creation of jobs in construction and design. However, since the law was passed, the growth in sales of newly constructed homes has dropped each year, from 15% to 10% to 5%. Obviously, this law has had little or no effect on the sale of newly constructed homes.

Which of the following must be true if the above conclusion is to be properly drawn?

New house sales are directly tied to personal income.
New house sales cannot increase by more than 6% next year.
If the tax credit had been 50%, there would have been a larger increase in new house sales
Without the tax credit, new house sales would not have been significantly lower.
[b]Addresses the conclusion assuming that decrease would not have been sharp if this was not the case
Tax credits for specific purchases are usually ineffective in influencing consumers to make those purchases.

Answer should be clearly D
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2011
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink] New post 20 Jul 2011, 21:43
zuberahmed wrote:
Can some one please explain why E is incorrect?


E - Tax credits for specific purchases are usually ineffective in influencing consumers to make those purchases.
    If we negate, tax credits are usually effective in influencing consumers. It doesn't hurt the argument. Key word here is usually. In reality, it's neither here nor there (is that a GMAT SC-type correct idiom? I haven't gotten there yet hehe). Sure, tax credits are usually effective, but maybe here they are or are not.

D- Without the tax credit, new house sales would not have been significantly lower.
    If we negate, new house sales would be significantly lower without the tax credit. The argument breaks down and the law has an equally significant effect. Thus, this is the correct answer. It must be true if the above conclusion is to be properly drawn.

_________________

GMAT Day: Nov. 19, 2011

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 397
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 13

Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink] New post 23 Jul 2011, 00:57
zuberahmed wrote:
Can some one please explain why E is incorrect?


Tax credits for specific purchases are usually ineffective in influencing consumers to make those purchases.

This statement has no bearing on the conclusion which is : Obviously, this law has had little or no effect on the sale of newly constructed homes.

But I believe if the assumption was :Tax credits for specific purchases are usually effective in influencing consumers to make those purchases. It might be an assumption, because if you negate it, the argument may fail if change effective back to ineffective.

My answer was D as well.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Apr 2011
Posts: 268
Followers: 27

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 13

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink] New post 23 Jul 2011, 12:43
I chose E as well...stupid assumption questions lol. Whats the source?
_________________

Powerscore CR Bible Full Chapter Notes | Easily Extend Vocabulary List with Google Dictionary

Please kudo me if you found my post useful. Thanks!!! :)

Re: CR - Assumption 700 level   [#permalink] 23 Jul 2011, 12:43
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 A law passed in Rockville three years ago allows a 30% tax psdeol 4 19 Oct 2012, 09:47
A law passed in Rockville three years ago allows a 30% tax netcaesar 8 28 Aug 2009, 08:00
16 Experts publish their posts in the topic Controversial mortgage laws passed last year state that, if tenaman10 31 22 Jul 2009, 18:32
Controversial mortgage laws passed last year state that, if neelesh 4 23 Mar 2008, 05:20
A law passed five years ago requires all new cars sold in jamesrwright3 10 29 Dec 2006, 06:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A law passed in Rockville three years ago allows a 30% tax

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.