honchos wrote:
A major impediment to universal access to medication is the high cost of patented drugs, which are often specifically required by patients for survival. In an attempt to make such drugs more widely available to patients, one drug company is planning to offer patients a free one-month drug supply for every $1,000 they spend on patented drugs.
Which of the following, if true, most threatens the plan's prospects for success?
A. Many patented drugs are not designed to be used for more than two weeks.
B. The drug company offering free one-month supplies will increase their prices so that the effective cost per dose remains the same.
C. Most patients who depend on patented drugs for survival possess insurance coverage that pays most of the cost of the drugs they require.
D. Whenever possible, physicians prescribe drugs that are available in generic alternatives that are not patented.
E. Patients who suffer from the most severe ailments often require multiple drugs patented by different companies as part of their daily regimen.
I have some doubts.
1. Attempt is to make drugs (which are required for survival) more widely available
2. free one-month drug supply for
every $1,000: Does this mean that somebody can invest $1000 every month to earn a free one month trial of the drug? Even if not, the drug would be available for atleast a month.
3. Even if drugs are available only for a month (indicated in choice B): Does that not account for increase in availability?
I initially though of C, but understanding that the money issue is still there (after accessibility to insurance). B is the only viable option, but for weakener questions on GMAT, we hardly come across ambiguous answer choices.
Pl correct me if I am wrong.