Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 22:58 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 22:58

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Status:Verbal Forum Moderator
Posts: 361
Own Kudos [?]: 2197 [15]
Given Kudos: 298
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Dec 2012
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 71 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 259
Own Kudos [?]: 239 [0]
Given Kudos: 58
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 May 2013
Status:Persevering
Posts: 114
Own Kudos [?]: 231 [1]
Given Kudos: 34
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: A major impediment to universal access to medication is the [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
B it is,

A major impediment to universal access to medication is the high cost of patented drugs, which are often specifically required by patients for survival. In an attempt to make such drugs more widely available to patients, one drug company is planning to offer patients a free one-month drug supply for every $1,000 they spend on patented drugs.

Which of the following, if true, most threatens the plan's prospects for success?

A. Many patented drugs are not designed to be used for more than two weeks. Even if all of them are not designed to be used for two weeks, there might be several of them,so the dosage can span for a month. In any case, we get the benefit because we get the drugs for free.
B. The drug company offering free one-month supplies will increase their prices so that the effective cost per dose remains the same.Correct,If the effective cost remains the same then why on earth will this scheme be beneficial. It would be on the other hand harmful to the patients who do not spend 1000$.This is the one that most damages the plan's prospect of being successful.
C. Most patients who depend on patented drugs for survival possess insurance coverage that pays most of the cost of the drugs they require.I don't care if it pays for most of the cost. I still do get a benefit with the scheme.
D. Whenever possible, physicians prescribe drugs that are available in generic alternatives that are not patented.Irrelevant, what happens if alternatives are not available, In any case the company is providing me with the benefit.
E. Patients who suffer from the most severe ailments often require multiple drugs patented by different companies as part of their daily regimenMaybe they do but does it absolutely make for a case where no patient would spend a 1000 bucks for the patented drug ?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 141 [0]
Given Kudos: 83
Location: Canada
Schools: LBS '18
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE:Design (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: A major impediment to universal access to medication is the [#permalink]
ramannanda9 wrote:
B it is,

A major impediment to universal access to medication is the high cost of patented drugs, which are often specifically required by patients for survival. In an attempt to make such drugs more widely available to patients, one drug company is planning to offer patients a free one-month drug supply for every $1,000 they spend on patented drugs.

Which of the following, if true, most threatens the plan's prospects for success?

A. Many patented drugs are not designed to be used for more than two weeks. Even if all of them are not designed to be used for two weeks, there might be several of them,so the dosage can span for a month. In any case, we get the benefit because we get the drugs for free.
B. The drug company offering free one-month supplies will increase their prices so that the effective cost per dose remains the same.Correct,If the effective cost remains the same then why on earth will this scheme be beneficial. It would be on the other hand harmful to the patients who do not spend 1000$.This is the one that most damages the plan's prospect of being successful.
C. Most patients who depend on patented drugs for survival possess insurance coverage that pays most of the cost of the drugs they require.I don't care if it pays for most of the cost. I still do get a benefit with the scheme.
D. Whenever possible, physicians prescribe drugs that are available in generic alternatives that are not patented.Irrelevant, what happens if alternatives are not available, In any case the company is providing me with the benefit.
E. Patients who suffer from the most severe ailments often require multiple drugs patented by different companies as part of their daily regimenMaybe they do but does it absolutely make for a case where no patient would spend a 1000 bucks for the patented drug ?


For your explanation of point B. The company sells a drug for 1200$ now, so for 2 drugs = 2400$ they'd have to give you 2 month free supplies. now they up the cost to 1600$ so for 2 drugs they'd have to give you 3 months of free supplies. isn't it beneficial to you?

Plus no matter how much of the cost you may increase, you can always make up for it in a single day of free supplies. even if you paid 1 million $ for drugs, you could make up for it in a single day of free supplies.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14816
Own Kudos [?]: 64887 [2]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: A major impediment to universal access to medication is the [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
honchos wrote:
A major impediment to universal access to medication is the high cost of patented drugs, which are often specifically required by patients for survival. In an attempt to make such drugs more widely available to patients, one drug company is planning to offer patients a free one-month drug supply for every $1,000 they spend on patented drugs.

Which of the following, if true, most threatens the plan's prospects for success?

A. Many patented drugs are not designed to be used for more than two weeks.
B. The drug company offering free one-month supplies will increase their prices so that the effective cost per dose remains the same.
C. Most patients who depend on patented drugs for survival possess insurance coverage that pays most of the cost of the drugs they require.
D. Whenever possible, physicians prescribe drugs that are available in generic alternatives that are not patented.
E. Patients who suffer from the most severe ailments often require multiple drugs patented by different companies as part of their daily regimen.


Responding to a pm:

Plan: offer patients a free one-month drug supply for every $1,000 they spend on patented drugs
What does the plan want to achieve? "to make such drugs more widely available to patients"
The plan will try to make the high cost drugs more widely available.

Option (B) says that prices will be increased so effective cost per dose will remain the same. If this happens, patients will pay whatever they have been paying. It does not reduce the price of the drug and hence does not make it more widely available. It directly attacks the plan and hence is the correct answer.

If you want to take some numbers to understand, say a patient needs $1000 worth patented drugs every month. If the company bumps up the cost to $2000 for a month's supply and gives him a month's free supply when he buys the $2000 drug, the patient still pays $2000 for 2 month's drug therapy. Hence the price does not come down for him so the company's plan of making the drug more widely available does not succeed.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Mar 2018
Posts: 41
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V36
GPA: 4
WE:Operations (Consumer Products)
Send PM
Re: A major impediment to universal access to medication is the [#permalink]
honchos wrote:
A major impediment to universal access to medication is the high cost of patented drugs, which are often specifically required by patients for survival. In an attempt to make such drugs more widely available to patients, one drug company is planning to offer patients a free one-month drug supply for every $1,000 they spend on patented drugs.

Which of the following, if true, most threatens the plan's prospects for success?

A. Many patented drugs are not designed to be used for more than two weeks.
B. The drug company offering free one-month supplies will increase their prices so that the effective cost per dose remains the same.
C. Most patients who depend on patented drugs for survival possess insurance coverage that pays most of the cost of the drugs they require.
D. Whenever possible, physicians prescribe drugs that are available in generic alternatives that are not patented.
E. Patients who suffer from the most severe ailments often require multiple drugs patented by different companies as part of their daily regimen.


I have some doubts.
1. Attempt is to make drugs (which are required for survival) more widely available
2. free one-month drug supply for every $1,000: Does this mean that somebody can invest $1000 every month to earn a free one month trial of the drug? Even if not, the drug would be available for atleast a month.
3. Even if drugs are available only for a month (indicated in choice B): Does that not account for increase in availability?

I initially though of C, but understanding that the money issue is still there (after accessibility to insurance). B is the only viable option, but for weakener questions on GMAT, we hardly come across ambiguous answer choices.

Pl correct me if I am wrong.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2020
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Re: A major impediment to universal access to medication is the [#permalink]
Even if the price is hiked the patient doesn't care because for every 1,000 he spends he will get a month free. Thus, even if he gets 1 pill or 10 pills it doesn't matter as long as he spends 10,000$. If he does he will get a month treatment for free.
That's why I don't think its B
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A major impediment to universal access to medication is the [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne