Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Jul 2014, 02:30

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1943
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 249 [0], given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2008, 21:25
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

90% (02:15) correct 10% (01:22) wrong based on 90 sessions
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 61
Page: 140
Difficulty:


A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?


(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles.
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning.
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered.
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 295
Location: SFO Bay Area
Schools: Berkeley Haas
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-confused [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2008, 13:00
I would answer C.

As the number facing is decreasing, it means the distance remaining is decreasing and vice versa the other num is increasing that she has covered one more unit of distance.

_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------
When you come to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on.

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 629
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-confused [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2008, 13:36
I second C. That seems to be the standard way of marking mileposts on highways.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2008
Posts: 18
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-confused [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2008, 14:12
sondenso wrote:
A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?
(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed. If numbers have been reversed, it's not only on 'next milepost' but on both of them -> Eliminate it
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles. ... don't need to explain why I eliminate it!
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning. logical answer; the distance to the end the path is decreasing each mile -> Hold it
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered. "the milepost one mile further"... so every milestone is at the right place, no one is missing. -> eliminate it
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers. this one is fun but... eliminate it!



-> C :)
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 793
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-confused [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2008, 21:08
Another C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 295
Location: SFO Bay Area
Schools: Berkeley Haas
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-confused [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2008, 21:25
How about the following CR question ??

11-t58442

SKS

_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------
When you come to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on.

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 735
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-confused [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2008, 21:57
sondenso wrote:
A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?


(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.[wrong eliminate]
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles. [ wrong eliminate]
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning. [ logical]
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered. [ don't feel in the logical gap -eliminate]
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers.[ irrelevant -eliminate]

so C
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1943
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 249 [0], given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: CR-confused [#permalink] New post 23 Jan 2008, 00:28
Thank all of you guys, paradox is a nightmare for me, do you have any tips for this?

_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2009
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2009, 21:21
A milepost on the towpath read"21"on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and"23"on its back.She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read"20"facing her and"24"behind.

Which of the following,if true,would explain the discrepancy described above?

(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers,not miles.
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path.not miles from the beginning.
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered.
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers,not for hikers.

_________________

- Its all about correctness first and then the timing.

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 455
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 64 [2] , given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: Good Question [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2009, 21:40
2
This post received
KUDOS
pual wrote:
A milepost on the towpath read"21"on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and"23"on its back.She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read"20"facing her and"24"behind.

Which of the following,if true,would explain the discrepancy described above?

(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers,not miles.
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path.not miles from the beginning.
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered.
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers,not for hikers.


I'm not sure I understand this problem, specially the hiker's reasoning part. So I will go by POE.

A: Maybe. Let's keep it for now.
B: Irrelevant, unit won't make a difference in this case.
C: This sounds reasonable, because from the problem description it vaguely seems that the hiker was expecting the numbers to be in a certain order, but in fact it's reversed. Strong candidate, let's keep this for now.
D: Maybe, maybe not. But it doesn't change the dist, or direction.
E: Irrelevant.

Between, A & C, C looks the best. So C for me.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2009
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Good Question [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2009, 01:10
good explanation buddy...thanks...!!!

_________________

- Its all about correctness first and then the timing.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 64
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the [#permalink] New post 24 Jul 2010, 10:28
A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?
(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles.
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning.
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered.
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers.
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Status: battlecruiser, operational...
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 985
Schools: Carey '16
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 71

GMAT Tests User
Re: Critical Reasoning [#permalink] New post 24 Jul 2010, 12:27
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 226
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 11

GMAT Tests User
Re: Critical Reasoning [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2010, 00:29
I pick C.

It is exactly as C said, nothing more to add.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 150
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 3

Re: Critical Reasoning [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2010, 21:03
C

_________________

consider cudos if you like my post

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 658
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 51

GMAT Tests User
Re: Good Question [#permalink] New post 29 Apr 2011, 09:20
C clearly explains the so called paradox

_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 206
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the [#permalink] New post 24 Mar 2012, 14:06
I have chosen the answer C for this question:

You can almost think of this question like a basic math problem. You know that the total distance of the hike is 44 miles. If this individual hikes and sees 21 on the front of the milepost and 23 on the back, you probably won't be sure what those numbers mean. However, after you hike some more and see 20 on the front and 24 on the back, it should tell you that you have just walked 1 mile and that the number on the front tells you remaining distance, not distance traveled.

A. This answer choice would be incorrect because the next sign should only be a 1 mile difference, yet we would have 21 and 24 as the milepost readings.

B. The unit of measurement is not important

C. This is the correct answer and it definitely resolves the paradox.

D. This doesn't make much sense because what milepost would be in between 21 and 20?

E. Who the milepost was put in for is irrelevant.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 930
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 543

Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the [#permalink] New post 27 May 2013, 00:51
Can someone please provide detailed explanation! Thanks!

_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1125
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 104

Kudos [?]: 1082 [1] , given: 219

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the [#permalink] New post 27 May 2013, 01:12
1
This post received
KUDOS
fozzzy wrote:
Can someone please provide detailed explanation! Thanks!


A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?

The correct answer will resolve the "paradox", we can discard

(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles. - this would make no difference
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers. - this would make no difference

We are left with

(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning.
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered.

The milepost has a side with "21"(other side "23").She is running and thinks a "22" will follow

However a 20 is on the next milepost, with a 24 on its back.

In her logic the numbers increase 21+1=22 so this count is the number of miles she has run. (=miles from the beginning)
In her path she encounters a decrease 21-1=20 so the actual number does not represent the miles she has run, but the miles LEFT to run.(=miles to the end of the path)

Example: 10 miles
10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 Miles to the end=> decrease
1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10 Miles from the beg.=> increase

_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the   [#permalink] 27 May 2013, 01:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the EnterMatrix 0 26 Jul 2010, 21:03
A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the sondenso 0 27 May 2013, 01:12
A six-sided die with faces numbered one through six is young_gun 3 08 Nov 2007, 09:41
A six-sided die with faces numbered one through six is faisalt 3 18 Nov 2005, 03:53
A six-sided die with faces numbered one through six is gayathri 10 17 Jan 2005, 09:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.