isbaspirant wrote:
What is wrong with A?It may be that management coud not identify the rude staff and fired unnecessarily! ps help in this!
The review raised two issues: (1) Rude wait staff, and (2) Overpriced food.
Actions by new management: (1) Dismiss of majority of staff (this might have addressed rude staff), and (2) revision of menu (we do not know what was the revision: food price might have reduced very little or moderately or a lot - who knows!)
A) This statement addresses possibility of not managing one issue (but we do not know for sure whether all the rude waiters were dismissed). No information on handling other issue.
B) Weakens the argument.
C) People's negative perception could have changed if they knew about the change of management and the actions taken by the new management. As customers did not become aware of the management change, the sales didn't improve much.
Correct.
D) This statement weakens the argument. If the sales are unusually high when the management change happened, the restaurant's sales would have increased as well.
E) This statement addresses food pricing moderately, but we do not know if
the price of the other restaurant is on the higher side. If the food price of the new restaurant is on the higher side, food price of the restaurant of our concern is also on the higher side. So, similar pricing is not giving any edge to the restaurant of our concern. Also, no information provided on handling other issue.
Correct answer is C.Check the highlighted portion.
I do not think that there is any reason to think about the price to be higher side as it is clearly stated the price of items in the new restaurant were same to that of the of the older one.
Hence the explanation of E seems completely flawed.