A new species of fish has just been discovered living in : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 02:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A new species of fish has just been discovered living in

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2011
Posts: 214
GPA: 3.46
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 293 [0], given: 172

A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2013, 20:28
9
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

24% (02:29) correct 76% (01:31) wrong based on 744 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A new species of fish has just been discovered living in great numbers in the waters off Papua New Guinea. The fish exhibits some characteristics belonging to sharks, such as a cartilaginous skeleton. However, the fish also exhibits characteristics belonging to eels, such as a long, snake-like body. Because of the habitat where it was found and its obviously eel-like body, almost all scientists believe that the fish is an eel. But the cartilaginous skeleton puzzles them, since no known eel possesses one. So scientists are still unsure as to the fish's precise classification, but they agreed immediately that the most logical classification would be as either a shark or an eel.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which of the following?

A. To be placed into a certain classification, a fish must possess all the characteristics of that classification.
B. Physical characteristics, such as skeletons, are scientists' primary means of classifying new species.
C. Some fish with cartilaginous skeletons are not sharks.
D. The waters off Papua New Guinea are generally hospitable to eels.
E. A fish cannot be both a shark and an eel.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Intern
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 22
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 57

Re: A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2013, 02:39
Hi,

Can you please explain why "Option D" is correct and others are not?
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 346
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 191

Kudos [?]: 366 [3] , given: 4

Re: A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2013, 02:54
3
KUDOS
Hi Prateek,

Let me see if I can help.

The issue with your answer C, is that no where in the passage does it suggest that there are other fish that are not sharks with a cartilaginous skeleton. In fact it says the opposite - the problem scientists are having is that they've not come across such a thing in an eel like fish before.

D is correct, because you can infer that because many scientists are happy to call this fish an eel, that eel's must be found close to Papa New Guinea.

Does that make sense?

James
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0

... and more

Current Student
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 300
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 242

Re: A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2013, 05:48
I marked E. The last sentence made me more inclined towards E
Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2013
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 17

Re: A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2013, 10:47
plumber250 wrote:
Hi Prateek,

Let me see if I can help.

The issue with your answer C, is that no where in the passage does it suggest that there are other fish that are not sharks with a cartilaginous skeleton. In fact it says the opposite - the problem scientists are having is that they've not come across such a thing in an eel like fish before.

D is correct, because you can infer that because many scientists are happy to call this fish an eel, that eel's must be found close to Papa New Guinea.

Does that make sense?

James

I chose A .

..So scientists are still unsure as to the fish's precise classification, but they agreed immediately that the most logical classification would be as either a shark or an eel...

What I inferred from here is that scientist are in dilemma and they are not able to classify the fish as an eel or as shark cause they are bound by some rules. Option A told the same ...To be placed into a certain classification, a fish must possess all the characteristics of that classification .. If this rule is not there then they could have easily classified the fish as an eel or as a shark based on few characteristics (must not possess all).

_________________

The First and Last time !!!

BKPL - Below Kudos Poverty Line .....Need your help.

Intern
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Posts: 28
Location: India
Concentration: Accounting, Finance
GMAT Date: 10-25-2013
GPA: 3.66
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 30

Re: A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2013, 10:51
b2bt wrote:
I marked E. The last sentence made me more inclined towards E

Even I marked E as my answer.

Can someone please explain this question????
_________________

Strive for Excellence....!!!!!

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2011
Posts: 214
GPA: 3.46
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 293 [2] , given: 172

Re: A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2013, 19:38
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
This is OE given by Kaplan.

Conclusion: This is an inference question that asks us to draw a conclusion from the information provided. What must also be true given the stimulus?

Evidence: Since we need to draw our own conclusion, we can use all facts provided in the argument as evidence.

The first sentence states that the new fish was discovered off the waters of Papua New Guinea. In addition, the sentence 4 states that the new fish shares its habitat with the eel. In combination, these two sentences indicate that eels also live in the waters off Papua New Guinea. So this region must be hospitable to eels, as stated in (D).

(A) doesn't follow from the information given. The last sentence implies that the new fish could be classified as a shark even though it does not have a cartilaginous skeleton Also, it is extreme in its use of the word all. With (B), the importance of physical characteristics relative to other characteristics is not discussed. With (C), if the new fish were to be classified as an eel, then we could conclude that at least one fish with a cartilaginous skeleton is not a shark. The stimulus, however, never says this. Furthermore, we aren't told anything about other fish classifications. And with (E), the last sentence states that the new fish will probably be classified as either a shark or an eel, but suggests nothing about an animal being both. Though this choice may seem true, we don't know for certain.

Hope it helps!!
Senior Manager
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 265
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: EMLYON FT'16
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 62 [1] , given: 401

Re: A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2013, 10:28
1
KUDOS
mba1382 wrote:
A new species of fish has just been discovered living in great numbers in the waters off Papua New Guinea. The fish exhibits some characteristics belonging to sharks, such as a cartilaginous skeleton. However, the fish also exhibits characteristics belonging to eels, such as a long, snake-like body. Because of the habitat where it was found and its obviously eel-like body, almost all scientists believe that the fish is an eel. But the cartilaginous skeleton puzzles them, since no known eel possesses one. So scientists are still unsure as to the fish's precise classification, but they agreed immediately that the most logical classification would be as either a shark or an eel.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which of the following?

A. To be placed into a certain classification, a fish must possess all the characteristics of that classification.
B. Physical characteristics, such as skeletons, are scientists' primary means of classifying new species.
C. Some fish with cartilaginous skeletons are not sharks.
D. The waters off Papua New Guinea are generally hospitable to eels.
E. A fish cannot be both a shark and an eel.

I discussed this question with my teacher and his answer was direct: this will never be on a GMAT exam!

The reason he evoked is that "generally" is not correct in the answer choices. Generally could mean that only 60% of the waters off Papua new Guinea are hospitable to eels and therefore, the conclusion is not obvious and is ambiguous!

A. To be placed into a certain classification, a fish must possess all the characteristics of that classification. - "All" is incorrect - Wrong
B. Physical characteristics, such as skeletons, are scientists' primary means of classifying new species. - Not stated - Wrong
C. Some fish with cartilaginous skeletons are not sharks. - Can not logically conclued this from text - Wrong

The answer E is an extrapolation that is too extreme to be stated. "A fish (meaning all the kind of fish) cannot be a shark and an eel"

This will never be on the GMAT exam...
_________________

Think outside the box

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10534
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2015, 01:35
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Oct 2015
Posts: 379
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q36 V48
GPA: 3.93
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 211

A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2016, 06:20
plumber250 wrote:
Hi Prateek,

Let me see if I can help.

The issue with your answer C, is that no where in the passage does it suggest that there are other fish that are not sharks with a cartilaginous skeleton. In fact it says the opposite - the problem scientists are having is that they've not come across such a thing in an eel like fish before.

D is correct, because you can infer that because many scientists are happy to call this fish an eel, that eel's must be found close to Papa New Guinea.

Does that make sense?

James

I can as well say, B is correct, because you can infer that because many scientists are happy to use only the physical characteristics in classifying the new finding.
And I would be validly as right as the GMATpill guy was... yeah afterall i copied his logic.
Don't create more puzzle than the question already did.

Then another guy said B. Physical characteristics, such as skeletons, are scientists' primary means of classifying new species. - Not stated - Wrong Was D stated?

I want to listen to real guys not outdated members.
Where are those GMAT monsters like chetan2u, HKD1710, as well as VeritasPrepKarishma and DmitryFarber if I'm lucky?
Director
Joined: 21 Jun 2014
Posts: 503
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
GPA: 2.49
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 92

A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2016, 07:13
Nez wrote:
plumber250 wrote:
Hi Prateek,

Let me see if I can help.

The issue with your answer C, is that no where in the passage does it suggest that there are other fish that are not sharks with a cartilaginous skeleton. In fact it says the opposite - the problem scientists are having is that they've not come across such a thing in an eel like fish before.

D is correct, because you can infer that because many scientists are happy to call this fish an eel, that eel's must be found close to Papa New Guinea.

Does that make sense?

James

I can as well say, B is correct, because you can infer that because many scientists are happy to use only the physical characteristics in classifying the new finding.
And I would be validly as right as the GMATpill guy was... yeah afterall i copied his logic.
Don't create more puzzle than the question already did.

Then another guy said B. Physical characteristics, such as skeletons, are scientists' primary means of classifying new species. - Not stated - Wrong Was D stated?

I want to listen to real guys not outdated members.
Where are those GMAT monsters like chetan2u, HKD1710, as well as VeritasPrepKarishma and DmitryFarber if I'm lucky?

Hi Nez
Hope this would clear your doubt : http://gmatclub.com/forum/top150-cr-a-new-species-of-fish-has-just-been-discovered-living-in-210119.html#p1619249
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------
Target - 720-740
helpful post means press '+1' for Kudos!
http://gmatclub.com/forum/information-on-new-gmat-esr-report-beta-221111.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/list-of-one-year-full-time-mba-programs-222103.html

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Oct 2015
Posts: 379
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q36 V48
GPA: 3.93
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 211

A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2016, 11:20
HKD1710 wrote:
Nez wrote:
plumber250 wrote:
Hi Prateek,

Let me see if I can help.

The issue with your answer C, is that no where in the passage does it suggest that there are other fish that are not sharks with a cartilaginous skeleton. In fact it says the opposite - the problem scientists are having is that they've not come across such a thing in an eel like fish before.

D is correct, because you can infer that because many scientists are happy to call this fish an eel, that eel's must be found close to Papa New Guinea.

Does that make sense?

James

I can as well say, B is correct, because you can infer that because many scientists are happy to use only the physical characteristics in classifying the new finding.
And I would be validly as right as the GMATpill guy was... yeah afterall i copied his logic.
Don't create more puzzle than the question already did.

Then another guy said B. Physical characteristics, such as skeletons, are scientists' primary means of classifying new species. - Not stated - Wrong Was D stated?

I want to listen to real guys not outdated members.
Where are those GMAT monsters like chetan2u, HKD1710, as well as VeritasPrepKarishma and DmitryFarber if I'm lucky?

Hi Nez
Hope this would clear your doubt : http://gmatclub.com/forum/top150-cr-a-new-species-of-fish-has-just-been-discovered-living-in-210119.html#p1619249

It didnt help.
I know why A through E are not the answer.
This is Inference.
I'm commenting cos I saw Kaplan in the source tag. If I had seen "Others", I wouldn't look at this question twice. You know what I mean.
Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2014
Posts: 48
Schools: ISB '17
GMAT 1: 530 Q35 V28
GPA: 2.5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [1] , given: 93

Re: A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2016, 23:57
1
KUDOS
For D to be answer ... and i think it can be inferred from the following statement in the passage.
A new species of fish has just been discovered living in great numbers in the waters off Papua New Guinea. The fish exhibits some characteristics belonging to sharks, such as a cartilaginous skeleton. However, the fish also exhibits characteristics belonging to eels, such as a long, snake-like body. Because of the habitat where it was found and its obviously eel-like body, almost all scientists believe that the fish is an eel. But the cartilaginous skeleton puzzles them, since no known eel possesses one. So scientists are still unsure as to the fish's precise classification, but they agreed immediately that the most logical classification would be as either a shark or an eel.

hence we can infer that the region is eel friendly ..HOW??? The scientists hypothesis that since this eel like looking fish is found in eel populated area ,it has to be an eel species ..
BTW I too choose a different answer(B) and then I read the passage closely and deduced this...
I may be wrong...
Damm these inference questions....
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Oct 2015
Posts: 379
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q36 V48
GPA: 3.93
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 211

Re: A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2016, 01:01
nikhiljd wrote:
For D to be answer ... and i think it can be inferred from the following statement in the passage.
A new species of fish has just been discovered living in great numbers in the waters off Papua New Guinea. The fish exhibits some characteristics belonging to sharks, such as a cartilaginous skeleton. However, the fish also exhibits characteristics belonging to eels, such as a long, snake-like body. Because of the habitat where it was found and its obviously eel-like body, almost all scientists believe that the fish is an eel. But the cartilaginous skeleton puzzles them, since no known eel possesses one. So scientists are still unsure as to the fish's precise classification, but they agreed immediately that the most logical classification would be as either a shark or an eel.

hence we can infer that the region is eel friendly ..HOW??? The scientists hypothesis that since this eel like looking fish is found in eel populated area ,it has to be an eel species ..
BTW I too choose a different answer(B) and then I read the passage closely and deduced this...
I may be wrong...
Damm these inference questions....

nikhiljd you are not wrong.
You were very close.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 4225
Followers: 327

Kudos [?]: 3452 [1] , given: 101

Re: A new species of fish has just been discovered living in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2016, 03:12
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Nez wrote:
nikhiljd wrote:
For D to be answer ... and i think it can be inferred from the following statement in the passage.
A new species of fish has just been discovered living in great numbers in the waters off Papua New Guinea. The fish exhibits some characteristics belonging to sharks, such as a cartilaginous skeleton. However, the fish also exhibits characteristics belonging to eels, such as a long, snake-like body. Because of the habitat where it was found and its obviously eel-like body, almost all scientists believe that the fish is an eel. But the cartilaginous skeleton puzzles them, since no known eel possesses one. So scientists are still unsure as to the fish's precise classification, but they agreed immediately that the most logical classification would be as either a shark or an eel.

hence we can infer that the region is eel friendly ..HOW??? The scientists hypothesis that since this eel like looking fish is found in eel populated area ,it has to be an eel species ..
BTW I too choose a different answer(B) and then I read the passage closely and deduced this...
I may be wrong...
Damm these inference questions....

nikhiljd you are not wrong.
You were very close.

Hi,

Sorry, did not see your earlier post of 12 april...
Nikhil is bang on with his explanation..

Rather even the first time you read it, you should be slightly wary of --
Because of the habitat where it was found and its obviously eel-like body, almost all scientists believe that the fish is an eel..
We are talking of characteristics and then all of a sudden the words " Because of the habitat where it was found" are spoken, which do not have otherwise any place in the argument..

And as it turns out, the Q asks for some inference and this HABITAT comes up once again..

And, Ofcourse, the argument says that one of the reasons the new species should be classified as EEL is because of its habitat... so the place must be home to EELs..
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html

Re: A new species of fish has just been discovered living in   [#permalink] 17 Apr 2016, 03:12
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 #Top150 CR: A new species of fish has just been discovered living in 3 16 Dec 2015, 08:40
9 A new species of fish has just been discovered living in gre 16 28 Jul 2014, 07:07
8 Tony: A new kind of videocassette has just been developed 10 05 Jul 2013, 23:00
13 A new species of fish has just been discovered living in 25 06 Dec 2012, 01:29
2 A new species of fish has just been discovered living in 22 30 May 2010, 09:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by