Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Sep 2014, 22:03

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 201
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [1] , given: 21

A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2010, 06:57
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

40% (02:40) correct 60% (01:41) wrong based on 176 sessions
A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation period of only 39 days. At this stage, the joey's hind limbs are not well developed, but its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother's pouch for further development. The recent discovery that ancient marsupial lions were also born with only their forelimbs developed supports the hypothesis that newborn marsupial lions must also have needed to climb into their mothers' pouches.

The argument in this passage relies on which of the following assumptions?

a.All animals that are born after a short gestation period are born with some parts of their bodies underdeveloped.
b.Well developed forelimbs would have been more advantageous to ancient marsupial lions than well developed hind limbs would have been.
c.If the newborn marsupial lion did not climb into its mother's pouch, then paleontologists would be able to find evidence of this fact.
d.Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers' pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth.
e.Newborn marsupial lions would not have had only their forelegs developed if this development were of no use to the marsupial lions.

OA After Discussion!
_________________

Two great challenges: 1. Guts to Fail and 2. Fear to Succeed

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 298
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2010, 07:14
raghavakumar85 wrote:
A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation period of only 39 days. At this stage, the joey's hind limbs are not well developed, but its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother's pouch for further development. The recent discovery that ancient marsupial lions were also born with only their forelimbs developed supports the hypothesis that newborn marsupial lions must also have needed to climb into their mothers' pouches.

The argument in this passage relies on which of the following assumptions?

a.All animals that are born after a short gestation period are born with some parts of their bodies underdeveloped.>>> Never assumed, and negating this option doesn't help
b.Well developed forelimbs would have been more advantageous to ancient marsupial lions than well developed hind limbs would have been.>>> No discussion about the COMPARISON of forelimbs with Hind-limbs is done..
c.If the newborn marsupial lion did not climb into its mother's pouch, then paleontologists would be able to find evidence of this fact. >>> Out of scope
d.Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers' pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth.>>> Correct
e.Newborn marsupial lions would not have had only their forelegs developed if this development were of no use to the marsupial lions.>>> Development can serve some other purpose also..

OA After Discussion!



IMO D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 201
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 21

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2010, 08:09
No, That's not the OA anyways!
_________________

Two great challenges: 1. Guts to Fail and 2. Fear to Succeed

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1474
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 13

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2010, 09:08
E
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Posts: 91
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 2

Reviews Badge
Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2010, 09:59
is the answer E
i am assuming forelimbs(given in stimulus) means forelegs

only D and E are close

d talks abt jumping into pouche using the legs
e talks abt legs development. the arg talks abt usage of forelimbs for further development of hind limbs
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amar
http://amarnaik.wordpress.com

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 313
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 20

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2010, 10:09
Difficult one .. will go with d
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 298
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2010, 10:45
nverma wrote:
raghavakumar85 wrote:
A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation period of only 39 days. At this stage, the joey's hind limbs are not well developed, but its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother's pouch for further development. The recent discovery that ancient marsupial lions were also born with only their forelimbs developed supports the hypothesis that newborn marsupial lions must also have needed to climb into their mothers' pouches.

The argument in this passage relies on which of the following assumptions?

a.All animals that are born after a short gestation period are born with some parts of their bodies underdeveloped.>>> Never assumed, and negating this option doesn't help
b.Well developed forelimbs would have been more advantageous to ancient marsupial lions than well developed hind limbs would have been.>>> No discussion about the COMPARISON of forelimbs with Hind-limbs is done..
c.If the newborn marsupial lion did not climb into its mother's pouch, then paleontologists would be able to find evidence of this fact. >>> Out of scope
d.Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers' pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth.>>> Correct
e.Newborn marsupial lions would not have had only their forelegs developed if this development were of no use to the marsupial lions.>>> Development can serve some other purpose also..

OA After Discussion!



Initially chosen D, but i think C is also a strong contender here..!!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 70
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 5

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2010, 17:07
I'll go with E

Posted from my mobile device Image
_________________

+1 kudos me if this is of any help...

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1474
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 13

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2010, 21:02
Raghav - pls post oa
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 172
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 1

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2010, 03:03
D
_________________


R E S P E C T


Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2010
Posts: 125
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 17

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2010, 05:01
IMO D...OA pls???
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2010
Posts: 125
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 17

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2010, 05:01
OA???
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 114
Schools: Tuck, Duke, Cambridge, Said
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2010, 19:02
Is it E ??

Para assumes that the only reason for developed forelimbs is so that the offspring can climb into mother's pouch.
E provides and alternate theory for the limbs (useless).

My 2 cents (very first on this forum)

Any one knows the QA ? whats the source ?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2010, 01:45
IMHO B

The comparision of forelimbs and hindlimbs seems to be justified in this option.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 201
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [1] , given: 21

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2010, 08:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
Well, the OA is E guys! But, initially i thought it is out of scope and picked D.
_________________

Two great challenges: 1. Guts to Fail and 2. Fear to Succeed

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 409 [0], given: 36

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2010, 21:43
Thanks ! Kudos for the question.

raghavakumar85 wrote:
Well, the OA is E guys! But, initially i thought it is out of scope and picked D.

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1561
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 6

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2010, 09:40
E for me.

marsupial lions had ONLY forelimbs developed ==> because marsupial lions must have needed to climb into their mothers' pouches.

so the assumption is that marsupial lions would have had their forelimbs developed if the forelimbs were of no use.
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 90
Schools: Wharton..:)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [2] , given: 14

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 09 Nov 2010, 13:37
2
This post received
KUDOS
newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation period of only 39 days. At this stage, the joey's hind limbs are not well developed, but its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother's pouch for further development. The recent discovery that ancient marsupial lions were also born with only their forelimbs developed supports the hypothesis that newborn marsupial lions must also have needed to climb into their mothers' pouches.

The argument in this passage relies on which of the following assumptions?

a.All animals that are born after a short gestation period are born with some parts of their bodies underdeveloped.
b.Well developed forelimbs would have been more advantageous to ancient marsupial lions than well developed hind limbs would have been.
c.If the newborn marsupial lion did not climb into its mother's pouch, then paleontologists would be able to find evidence of this fact.
d.Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers' pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth.
e.Newborn marsupial lions would not have had only their forelegs developed if this development were of no use to the marsupial lions.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
can't really understand the debate D vs E; d does not even come close..
use assumption negation technique:
E) new born lions would have had only their forelegs developed if this developement were of no use to the mansupial lions----- simplify----------- forelimbs are developed only because they have no use..
from the stem - assumption is ( beacuse the forelimbs are developed THEY have to climb blah blah ..)
so negating E weakens the argument and is the ans!
_________________

" What [i] do is not beyond anybody else's competence"- warren buffett
My Gmat experience -http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-710-q-47-v-41-tips-for-non-natives-107086.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: swimming against the current
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 252
Location: Chennai, India
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 30

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2010, 08:06
E +1
_________________

Gonna make it this time

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Nov 2010
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 10

Re: Fore Limbs [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2010, 11:36
E it is......GOT it right!!
Re: Fore Limbs   [#permalink] 11 Nov 2010, 11:36
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 While most ecologists believe that the Striped Kangaroo of fozzzy 7 01 Jun 2013, 23:24
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation Vineetk 8 19 Nov 2012, 20:52
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation dimri10 6 11 Aug 2011, 09:23
While most ecologists believe that the Striped Kangaroo of gmatbull 5 04 Sep 2010, 15:49
One Thing Confuses Joey Live (Help!) JoeyLive 2 15 Oct 2008, 14:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 27 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.