|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 29
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
A newly discovered disease is thought to be caused by a [#permalink]
23 Apr 2010, 15:50
Question Stats:
24% (01:32) correct
76% (01:10) wrong based on 25 sessions
A newly discovered disease is thought to be caused by a certain bacterium. However, recently released data notes that the bacterium thrives(prosper) in the presence of a certain virus, implying that it is actually the virus that causes the new disease. Which of the following pieces of evidence would most support the data’s implication? (A) In the absence of the virus, the disease has been observed to follow infection by the bacterium. (B) The virus has been shown to aid the growth of bacterium, a process which often leads to the onset of the disease. (C) The virus alone has been observed in many cases of the disease. (D) In cases where the disease does not develop, infection by the bacterium is usually preceded by infection by the virus. (E) Onset of the disease usually follows infection by both the virus and the bacterium.
please explain the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 203
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
39
[0], given: 12
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
23 Apr 2010, 19:59
IMO it is B. Premise: A newly discovered disease is thought to be caused by a certain bacterium Premise: However, recently released data notes that the bacterium thrives(prosper) in the presence of a certain virus Conclusion: implying that it is actually the virus that causes the new disease We need to find the supportive evidence. (A) In the absence of the virus, the disease has been observed to follow infection by the bacterium. >> This is not supporting statement. It talks about after disease scenario.(B) The virus has been shown to aid the growth of bacterium, a process which often leads to the onset of the disease. >> Yes. This supports the conclusion.(C) The virus alone has been observed in many cases of the disease. >> This is conflicting. If this is correct then the first premise will go wrong.(D) In cases where the disease does not develop, infection by the bacterium is usually preceded by infection by the virus. >> This shows infection by bacteruim is preceded by infection by virus, but specifies in cases where disease does not develop. We should be looking for the disease cases.(E) Onset of the disease usually follows infection by both the virus and the bacterium. >> Talking about aftermath of disease. Not useful.
_________________
+1Kudos, if this helps
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 241
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 1
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
08 Jul 2010, 05:27
I chose C since the conclusion says that the actual cause of the disease is virus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1746
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 49
Kudos [?]:
150
[0], given: 108
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
08 Jul 2010, 16:30
OA please?
_________________
"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."
My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 29
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 4
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
09 Jul 2010, 12:01
poohv005 wrote: A newly discovered disease is thought to be caused by a certain bacterium. However, recently released data notes that the bacterium thrives(prosper) in the presence of a certain virus, implying that it is actually the virus that causes the new disease. Which of the following pieces of evidence would most support the data’s implication? (A) In the absence of the virus, the disease has been observed to follow infection by the bacterium. (B) The virus has been shown to aid the growth of bacterium, a process which often leads to the onset of the disease. (C) The virus alone has been observed in many cases of the disease. (D) In cases where the disease does not develop, infection by the bacterium is usually preceded by infection by the virus. (E) Onset of the disease usually follows infection by both the virus and the bacterium.
please explain the answer. IMO B is undermining the argument. If C is correct it strengthen's the argument that in majority of cases bacterium may not have any role to play in the disease. OA?
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1482
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 10
Kudos [?]:
61
[0], given: 13
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
09 Jul 2010, 20:10
C; We need to establish virus as the cause of the disease; there are two conflicting premises - and we are supposed to strengthen one (the data premise) over the other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Posts: 334
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
47
[0], given: 44
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
10 Jul 2010, 01:08
C
_________________
"Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiam." - Winston Churchill
As vs Like - Check this link : http://www.grammar-quizzes.com/like-as.html.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 172
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 1
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
10 Jul 2010, 04:03
C is my take. We need to support Virus. Virus alone causes the disease along with promoting the bacteria.
_________________
R E S P E C T
Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 447
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 112
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
10 Jul 2010, 22:17
picked b ....but surely its c
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Mesmerized
Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 183
Location: UAE, Dubai
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 12
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
30 Sep 2010, 01:35
I think it's C, we need show that the only cause of the disease is the Virus not both
_________________
Nanquam Fractum
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 188
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
45
[0], given: 11
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
02 Oct 2010, 23:42
My take is C
To strengthen the argument we have to show that virus is capable of causing the disease alone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 241
Location: India
WE 1: 6 Year, Telecom(GSM)
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
39
[0], given: 21
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
03 Oct 2010, 00:39
I will go for B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 147
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
13
[0], given: 29
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
03 Oct 2010, 02:51
I feel its B. what's the OA?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 48
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
15 Nov 2010, 23:00
I vote for C too. What's the OA?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 177
WE 1: 3 (Mining Operations)
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 33
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
16 Nov 2010, 02:11
It has to be C, Any event which shows that Virus is Present--> Disease is present & Bacteria is not present.. makes the presence of bacteria redundant
_________________
Regards, Invincible... "The way to succeed is to double your error rate." "Most people who succeed in the face of seemingly impossible conditions are people who simply don't know how to quit."
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 1797
Followers: 64
Kudos [?]:
650
[0], given: 478
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
16 Nov 2010, 07:14
B ...........boys The argument: a new disease is discovered AND it is helped by the presence of certain virus, to the onset of the disease B..............
_________________
KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 322
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 35
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
16 Nov 2010, 09:12
C) The virus alone has been observed in many cases of the disease.
This is the strongest among the choices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 322
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 35
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
16 Nov 2010, 09:22
OA is C. I picked this by google search.
B is too much of a stretch/extreme
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 268
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 520 Q42 V19 GMAT 2: 540 Q44 V21
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 22
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
16 Nov 2010, 10:54
amma4u wrote: OA is C. I picked this by google search.
B is too much of a stretch/extreme hi when i solve the question i also picked B thats there in my mind that we should concentrate on conclusion but both the premises is saying that bacterim is the cause shouldnt we consider that. ???
_________________
The proof of understanding is the ability to explain it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3170
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 597
Kudos [?]:
2126
[1] , given: 97
|
Re: CR strengthen question [#permalink]
18 Nov 2010, 07:52
1
This post received KUDOS
poohv005 wrote: A newly discovered disease is thought to be caused by a certain bacterium. However, recently released data notes that the bacterium thrives(prosper) in the presence of a certain virus, implying that it is actually the virus that causes the new disease. Which of the following pieces of evidence would most support the data’s implication? (A) In the absence of the virus, the disease has been observed to follow infection by the bacterium. (B) The virus has been shown to aid the growth of bacterium, a process which often leads to the onset of the disease. (C) The virus alone has been observed in many cases of the disease. (D) In cases where the disease does not develop, infection by the bacterium is usually preceded by infection by the virus. (E) Onset of the disease usually follows infection by both the virus and the bacterium.
please explain the answer. Let's focus on the question first because that is all that is relevant to us. (In fact, it helps to read the question first so that you can read the argument with the question in perspective) Which of the following pieces of evidence would most support the data’s implication? Now, before we move on, what is data's implication? implying that it is actually the virus that causes the new disease.Now you have to pick an answer choice which best supports 'it is actually the virus that causes the disease'. Focus on that. Option (C) clearly states that the virus alone has been found in many cases. Then it must be the virus that causes the disease. It does not conflict with the premise above - 'A newly discovered disease is thought to be caused by a certain bacterium.' The premise does not say that it is caused by the bacterium. It only says that it is thought to be caused by the bacterium. Option (B) doesn't strengthen that it is actually the virus that causes the disease. It says that the virus aids the growth of bacterium and this growth leads to development of the disease. The cause of the disease is still the bacterium. That is, if the bacterium weren't present, the virus probably couldn't do anything alone. (Note the probably here. This statement doesn't say that the virus alone cannot do anything but it also doesn't say that the virus alone can cause the disease) But we want to strengthen that it is actually the virus which is the cause.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog
Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.
Veritas Prep Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: CR strengthen question
[#permalink]
18 Nov 2010, 07:52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Vercules, Legendaddy, noboru, Marcab, metallicafan, rajeevrks27, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, souvik101990, doe007, MacFauz, PTK, carcass, kissthegmat, Narenn
|