A patient accusing a doctor of malpractice will find it difficult to prove damage if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify about proper medical procedures.
(A) if there is a lack of some other doctor to testify
(B) unless there will be another doctor to testify
(C) without another doctorâ€™s testimony
(D) should there be no testimony from some other doctor
(E) lacking another doctor to testify
What's wrong with "B"?
UNLESS or WITHOUT...which is better?
I think testify about
is fine. Google testify about
and you will see it is correct.
A is wrong because of other.
Other is used between 2 choices.
B is wrong because there is a tense change. accusing ....will be
C is correct and clear.
D is wrong because should
implies a moral obligation.
E is wrong because lacking
is a verb and needs a conjunction to connect the 2 phrases.