Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
A poor 620 (Q44, V31)......now let┬┤s see [#permalink]
26 Aug 2003, 08:41
I took the exam yesterday, very difficult math though I had a not so bad score. I thought I was doing very bad in quant, but it turned pretty well. I had only one combiantion problem (very easy), and one probability (DS).
On the verbal, I started very well with about 6 SC and then 2 RC of about 3 to 4 questions each. I thought I was doing great, but at the end, the result was completely dissapointing. I was expecting somthing like 37. I really do not understand what happened in verbal, as I was sure I was doing great.
Well that was my experience, really don┬┤t know if I will retake yet.
I had already given the GMAT 4 times, 500, 570 and 580, at least I improved every time.
Hi there...wow..4 cracks at the GMAT, full marks for perseverance! You're an inspiration actually because you've improved each time you've taken the test! I guess seeing how far you've actually come from your first score, you should be very happy with this score!
You said the maths was hard, yet you had a good score in the end What exactly was difficult or different that you encountered? _________________
I found math difficult maybe because I was anxious and nervous, but in the end I think the kind of problems were different form what I saw in the OG. There were more like tricky and time consuming. Lot of Algebra, some statistics, 1 comb and 1 prob, etc.
I will not rest till I get something above 650, so I may try it again in some days.
I completely agree with you about math.
The math was EXTREMELY difficult and time consuming.
Being a former mathematician, I hate to do backsolving in math problems,
but I had to do so in order to finish in time.
Don't lose heart! If you have any particular questions (which seems hard for your) I would be happy to help you with them! (but we should move to the quant section of this forum)