Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 27 May 2016, 06:04
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A product that is endorsed by a big name celebrity has a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Posts: 38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 37 [1] , given: 29

A product that is endorsed by a big name celebrity has a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2012, 22:41
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

62% (03:04) correct 38% (02:08) wrong based on 241 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A product that is endorsed by a big name celebrity has a clear competitive edge in marketing and as a result that product can generally command a high price. **Because endorsement by big name celebrities tends to be short-lived** (usually less than a few years) and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the maximum possible price for such a product during the time it is associated with the celebrity. ** But large profits on the celebrity-associated product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match their own products in terms of celebrity appeal. ** Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a celebrity-associated product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is an assumption that forms the basis for a course of action that the argument criticizes; the second presents the course of action endorsed by the argument.

(B) The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the wisdom of adopting that strategy.

(C) The first is an assumption that has been used to justify a certain strategy; the second is a consideration that is used to cast doubt on that assumption.

(D) The first is a consideration raised in support of a strategy the argument endorses; the second presents grounds in support of that consideration.

(E) The first is a consideration raised to show that adopting a certain strategy is unlikely to achieve the intended effect; the second is presented to explain the appeal of that strategy.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2008
Posts: 85
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 55 [2] , given: 165

Reviews Badge
Re: A product that is endorsed by a big name celebrity has a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2012, 23:35
2
This post received
KUDOS
This is a repost and you can see some explanations here:
a-product-that-represents-a-clear-technological-advance-over-118102.html

To your question about how to interpret different pieces of premises, go to this forum threat:
my-story-570-q49-v19-760-q50-v42-80323-20.html#p612286

Scroll down and dowlnoad the Word document "Explanation of common terms often encountered in the 'dreaded' BoldFace Questions.doc"
Here is a link to the file, as well: download/file.php?id=9033

I found it very helpful. Hopefully, it helps you, too.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 201
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 22

Re: A product that is endorsed by a big name celebrity has a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2012, 00:32
elegan wrote:
A product that is endorsed by a big name celebrity has a clear competitive edge in marketing and as a result that product can generally command a high price. **Because endorsement by big name celebrities tends to be short-lived** (usually less than a few years) and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the maximum possible price for such a product during the time it is associated with the celebrity. ** But large profits on the celebrity-associated product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match their own products in terms of celebrity appeal. ** Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a celebrity-associated product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A)

The first is an assumption that forms the basis for a course of action that the argument criticizes; the second presents the course of action endorsed by the argument.

(B)

The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the wisdom of adopting that strategy.

(C)

The first is an assumption that has been used to justify a certain strategy; the second is a consideration that is used to cast doubt on that assumption.

(D)

The first is a consideration raised in support of a strategy the argument endorses; the second presents grounds in support of that consideration.

(E)

The first is a consideration raised to show that adopting a certain strategy is unlikely to achieve the intended effect; the second is presented to explain the appeal of that strategy.

Hello,
Can you give me pointers on how we can answer this one? Seems that knowing the difference between consideration and assumption would help. In case formatting does not come out right, bolded text is found within the **asterisks**
Thanks.


First bold face statement : Because endorsement by big name celebrities tends to be short-lived

Effect of endorsements by celebrities is short term on the customers. Hence companies go for maximum possible price for that product to maximize profits while the effect lasts. This explains the appeal of a certain strategy, in this case endorsements by a celebrity. So this is explanation of a certain strategy.
Second bold face statement : But large profits on the celebrity-associated product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match their own products in terms of celebrity appeal.

An endorsement by a celebrity for a certain product gives an incentive to the competitor to endorse their products by a celebrity. Since the competitors copy the same strategy to maximize their profits, this calls into question the strategy of the company in the first place. Hence the second statement calls into question the wisdom of adopting the strategy of using celebrity endorsements for their products.

Choice B fits the bill.

Hope this helps
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7671
Followers: 712

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: A product that is endorsed by a big name celebrity has a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2014, 08:46
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 1614
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V26
GMAT 3: 560 Q43 V24
GMAT 4: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.56
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 104

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: A product that is endorsed by a big name celebrity has a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Mar 2016, 20:30
elegan wrote:
A product that is endorsed by a big name celebrity has a clear competitive edge in marketing and as a result that product can generally command a high price. **Because endorsement by big name celebrities tends to be short-lived** (usually less than a few years) and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the maximum possible price for such a product during the time it is associated with the celebrity. ** But large profits on the celebrity-associated product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match their own products in terms of celebrity appeal. ** Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a celebrity-associated product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is an assumption that forms the basis for a course of action that the argument criticizes; the second presents the course of action endorsed by the argument.

(B) The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the wisdom of adopting that strategy.

(C) The first is an assumption that has been used to justify a certain strategy; the second is a consideration that is used to cast doubt on that assumption.

(D) The first is a consideration raised in support of a strategy the argument endorses; the second presents grounds in support of that consideration.

(E) The first is a consideration raised to show that adopting a certain strategy is unlikely to achieve the intended effect; the second is presented to explain the appeal of that strategy.


wow..took me just little over 3 minutes to crack it..
the statements definitely do not agree with each other..
so D and E are out right away.

between A, B and C:
A - the argument does not criticize anything..plus, the second statement - the argument doesn't endorse this action..the argument doesn't endorse any of the two.. so A is out.
C - assumption - well..assumptions are not stated..so this is dubious..more likely the first is a fact/strategy that the argument seeks to explain why it is not a good one. second part though is correct. so C is out
B - yes, this is smth that the argument seeks to explain...and the second part is a consideration that explains why the first one is not ok.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 513
Schools: Cambridge'16
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 37

Re: A product that is endorsed by a big name celebrity has a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Mar 2016, 21:32
Assumption is unstated premise, so it cannot be boldfaced - A and C out. From B,D,E only B fits best

B
Re: A product that is endorsed by a big name celebrity has a   [#permalink] 06 Mar 2016, 21:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Lea: Contemporary art has become big business. Nowadays art rockubabe 15 23 May 2010, 15:13
22 Experts publish their posts in the topic Products sold under a brand name used to command premium zest4mba 18 02 Mar 2010, 11:45
1 Productivity has declined at Company X in recent months. The reply2spg 5 19 Feb 2009, 10:11
The US has experienced a big growth in job creation. This Caas 13 14 Jun 2007, 13:12
Delta products, Inc., has recently switched at least partly ricokevin 5 12 Apr 2007, 18:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A product that is endorsed by a big name celebrity has a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.