A proposed ordinance requires all cyclists wear a helmet : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 02 Dec 2016, 12:00

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A proposed ordinance requires all cyclists wear a helmet

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Moderator
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done!!
Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 681
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V34
Followers: 59

Kudos [?]: 990 [1] , given: 223

A proposed ordinance requires all cyclists wear a helmet [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2014, 21:11
1
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

82% (02:09) correct 18% (01:31) wrong based on 109 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A proposed ordinance requires that all cyclists wear a helmet when riding a bike. However, one cycling enthusiast argued that since more than ninety percent of bike-related accidents do not cause more than a scrape, mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the cycling enthusiast's argument?

A. Most cyclists do not currently own bike helmets.

B. The cost of buying a proper bike helmet is significantly less than possible medical costs due to injury.

C. Helmets have not proven useful in preventing head trauma in biking accidents since the force of the accident often causes the helmet to fall off.

D. In the city where the ordinance was proposed, the number of injuries due to bike accidents was less than the national average.

E. Most of the serious injuries resulting from bike accidents occur due to head trauma.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________
If you have any questions
New!
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 144
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 183 [2] , given: 9

Re: A proposed ordinance requires all cyclists wear a helmet [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2014, 21:03
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
This question is a good example of a trick that is very common within GMAT critical reasoning questions. The question includes a subtle but very important scope shift. The cycling enthusiast argues that most bicycle accidents are minor (do not cause more than a scrape), and therefore mandatory helmet use would only marginally decrease the number of serious injuries caused by cycling. The scope shift is between accidents in general and serious accidents. If over 90% of accidents do not cause more than a scrape, then obviously these accidents are not causing serious injuries. In order to weaken this argument, we need to demonstrate that helmets would help reduce serious injuries in the other sub-10% of more serious accidents.

A - Out of scope. Whether bicyclists currently own a helmet is completely irrelevant to whether helmet use would decrease the number of serious injuries.

B - Out of scope. Costs of helmets vs. medical care has nothing to do with this argument.

C - OPPOSITE. This Strengthens the argument. It does not weaken it. Be on the lookout for traps like these.

D - Out of scope. Number of injuries there vs. other areas is irrelevant. We simply care about whether the new ordinance would reduce injuries.

E - Nails it. If most serious injuries are due to head trauma, then it would make sense that mandatory helmet usage would reduce serious injuries. This weakens the argument effectively, and is the correct answer.
_________________

Brandon
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Save \$100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Re: A proposed ordinance requires all cyclists wear a helmet   [#permalink] 09 Jun 2014, 21:03
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 A proposed ordinance requires all cyclists wear a helmet 4 08 Jun 2014, 21:11
2 A proposed ordinance requires the installation 4 16 Oct 2013, 06:11
8 Certain hockey players began wearing helmets before the 6 08 Oct 2013, 20:21
2 A proposed law in State Q requires that all applicants 15 14 Aug 2011, 06:29
6 A teacher has proposed requiring all students in her 16 15 Jun 2010, 10:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by