Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A recent national study of the public schools shows that [#permalink]
18 Nov 2007, 14:17

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

67% (01:36) correct
33% (00:38) wrong based on 51 sessions

22. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.
(A) there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
(B) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
(C) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were
(D) every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were
(E) every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

Re: sc national study [#permalink]
18 Nov 2007, 16:32

A.Haung wrote:

22. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago. (A) there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were (B) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were (C) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were (D) every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were (E) every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

In (C) - 'there is' and 'as many as' stands out against option (A) and (B)

In (E) - 'now has' and 'as many as' is bettter than option (D)

Now which is the better choice.. I will go for 'C'

Re: sc national study [#permalink]
18 Nov 2007, 17:26

A.Haung wrote:

22. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago. (A) there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were (B) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were (C) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were (D) every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were (E) every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

1st split: as X as. only C and E left. everything else does not complete the idiom with the scond as.

Btwn C and E. I go for C, b/c four times as many as seems to illogically refer to one computer in E. C makes it clearer I think. I dunno if this is the correct reasoning though.

I was chosing between C and E b/c of "as many as" is the corret usage. However I still dont get why the answer is C rather than E. Is it because C is more clear? Or there is another grammer mistake in it.

Re: sc national study [#permalink]
21 May 2008, 13:11

A.Haung wrote:

22. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago. (A) there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were (B) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were (C) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were (D) every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were (E) every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

between C and E

C -- meaning --> computers (for every thirty-two pupils) , four times as many as there were --> No.of computers increased to 4 fold previously 32*4= 128 one computer for every 128 pupils. No increased to four fold..one computer for every 32 pupils E -- meaning --> 32 Pupils now has one computer, four times as many as they were.. previously 8 pupiles have one computere. Here four times refer to Pupils Number which changes the original meaning

correct me I am wrong _________________

Your attitude determines your altitude Smiling wins more friends than frowning

I was chosing between C and E b/c of "as many as" is the corret usage. However I still dont get why the answer is C rather than E. Is it because C is more clear? Or there is another grammer mistake in it.

A.Haung wrote:

(E) every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

Re: sc national study [#permalink]
21 Jun 2010, 20:58

Exactly the same Question I have, why "there were", why not "there was" ?

One more Question I have is , what is the role of construction "four times as many as there were four years ago" ? It seems clause to me, but how it can attach with another clause with comma only ?

Re: sc national study [#permalink]
10 May 2011, 22:56

tashu wrote:

Exactly the same Question I have, why "there were", why not "there was" ?

One more Question I have is , what is the role of construction "four times as many as there were four years ago" ? It seems clause to me, but how it can attach with another clause with comma only ?

Thanks in advance, Tashu

Hi all,

I have the same question as tashu, why not "there was"????

I couldn’t help myself but stay impressed. young leader who can now basically speak Chinese and handle things alone (I’m Korean Canadian by the way, so...