|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 418
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn [#permalink]
21 Feb 2006, 19:10
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980
that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times.
that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times.
that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio.
CEO's who now earn on average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio.
CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1356
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC: Recent review [#permalink]
21 Feb 2006, 19:43
is it CEO's or CEOs? should be CEOs, right. if so, then B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1134
Location: India
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
22
[0], given: 1
|
Has to be between A and B. I'll click B and move ahead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2934
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
37
[0], given: 0
|
I will go with A.
Don't you guys think that "a ratio that compares to 42 times" ,in B, has error. Can a ratio compare something? Its the review that is comparing and comparing to current ration.
_________________
SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 277
Location: Chennai,India
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
Yeah the bet is btw A & B here.. I will pick A too
_________________
vazlkaiye porkalam vazltuthan parkanum.... porkalam maralam porkalthan maruma
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 418
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
guys OA is C. source is GMATprep
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17
Kudos [?]:
90
[0], given: 0
|
we need "the ratio" at the end of the sentence to properly complete the comparison, which only (C) uses correctly. Agree with the OA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 128
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
I chose B also. Why is it C?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 15
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
How can it be C ?? In C "as compared to 42 times their pay" their is unclear referent .B seems right to me. Can anybody explain?[/b]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 104
Location: Barcelona
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Good question. I was stuck between A and C.
While In C "the ratio" is redundant. I find that in A "the CEO's earn an average of 419 times" gives us the impression that the salary of the CEO is an average of 419 times the pay of the worker which means it does not make sense.
However in C "on average, the CEO's earn 419 times" the pay of any CEO is about 419 times the pay of the worker, which is what the author intends to covey
_________________
...................................................................
reloading NEURON JELLY to reach another galaxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Posts: 91
Location: Prague, CZ
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Could someone else explain why is it (C)? It's still not clear to me. I liked none of these choices, but I think (A) and (B) are still better than (C).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 330
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
likar wrote: Could someone else explain why is it (C)? It's still not clear to me. I liked none of these choices, but I think (A) and (B) are still better than (C).
If it has to be C then it should be CEOs and not CEO's, so that their has a clear antecedent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 9
Location: U to the... S to the A
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
The correct answer is C, as has been indicated already
Quote: A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980
that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times.Unidiomatic : X times Y is correct, not X times more than Y
that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times. Misplaced Modifier : "..., a ratio..." seems to refer to the blue-collar workers
that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio.Correct : "Their" can be taken to refer to the "blue-collar workers" and not "CEOs". Best of the lot, eventhough one can argue that "their" doesnt have a clear antecedent.
CEO's who now earn on average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio. Missing conjunction "that", without which the sentence doesnt make sense.
CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times. Missing conjunction "that", without which the sentence doesnt make sense. Also, "average" is misplaced and seems to indicate that CEOs earn the average of "419 times the pay of blue-collar workers" [/b]
_________________
share and grow....
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1744
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
Will go with C.
Only C compares the number of times the salary is higher with another number of times.
Others make the mistake of comapring the number of times with the ratio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 246
Location: Italy
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC: Recent review [#permalink]
18 Jul 2006, 04:04
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980
that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times. are we not considering the ratio rather than the pay,... this is out
that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times. wordy
that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio. seems correct
CEO's who now earn on average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio. wordy
CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times
_________________
“If money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 333
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC: Recent review [#permalink]
18 Jul 2006, 14:23
C makes sense.. C clearly explains that ratios are compared..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: SC: Recent review
[#permalink]
18 Jul 2006, 14:23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|