Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEOs now earn [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 May 2008, 01:47

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 10 sessions

HideShow timer Statictics

31. A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

A. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times C. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio D. CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio E. CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times _________________

Year, OA is C, and with a BIG question WHY? in my head

B - a ratio that compares to 42 times (of What?) C avoids that confusion. However I am not comfortable with CEO's Is it CEOs ? If yes then then we have 'their' problem in C. If No, then the sentence does not make sense to me. ....., on average, CEO’s now earn ....., on average, CEOs now earn I see some difference here..but cannot expln what it is..can anyone help ..Thanks

We are comparing between ratio nowadays and ratio in 1980. Ok, INDICATES need THAT followed. => Rule out D, E.

A:ratio of 42 times in 1980. , B: 42 times ("of" what) in 1980. ==> Eliminate A, B. C:AS compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio in 1980. C containS AS. C has only problem with THEIR but can be ACCEPTABLE and C is also the best choice among 5 choices.

A. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times C. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio D. CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio E. CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

My answer is C. Could some one provide insight why C is wrong. A - average of 419 times - Eliminate B - a ratio that compares to 42 times - Felt akward - since both are ratios. Compared with is better - Eliminate C - as compared to looks correct, the ratio correctly modifies 42 times their pay. D and E - Eliminate. Sentence should start with that. _________________

Many people dream, but some wake up and work towards it.

31. A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

A. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times C. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio D. CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio E. CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

Very weird question, Sondenso. I believe that the apostrophe (') is wrong in all the choices. All choices should have CEOs not CEO's. But, if we neglect this error then,

D and E are out because they don't use "that".

A is out because it uses "more".

B is wrong because "a ratio" modifies workers.

So, only C is left.

what is source?

Last edited by sanjay_gmat on 22 May 2008, 07:42, edited 1 time in total.

Year, OA is C, and with a BIG question WHY? in my head

B - a ratio that compares to 42 times (of What?) C avoids that confusion. However I am not comfortable with CEO's Is it CEOs ? If yes then then we have 'their' problem in C. If No, then the sentence does not make sense to me. ....., on average, CEO’s now earn ....., on average, CEOs now earn I see some difference here..but cannot expln what it is..can anyone help ..Thanks

31. A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

A. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times - compared to? error of comparison B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times - Seems OK C. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio - "their" in 42 times their has no clear referrent D. CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio - "their" in 42 times their has no clear referrent E. CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times - no need for continuous present tense

IMO: B

Still in favor of B. Am I wrong if I say

A recent review of pay scales indicates that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 timesthe ratio in 1980. isn't "the ratio" implied?? Is there anything else that can be compared? If there is no ambiguity about it then B should be OK.

So, my final tally is in. I applied to three b schools in total this season: INSEAD – admitted MIT Sloan – admitted Wharton – waitlisted and dinged No...

A few weeks ago, the following tweet popped up in my timeline. thanks @Uber_Mumbai for showing me what #daylightrobbery means!I know I have a choice not to use it...

“This elective will be most relevant to learn innovative methodologies in digital marketing in a place which is the origin for major marketing companies.” This was the crux...