Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 02 Sep 2014, 04:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A recent study of epidemiological data from the past several

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
A recent study of epidemiological data from the past several [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2009, 08:17
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A recent study of epidemiological data from the past several hundred years has provided new evidence undermining the theory of a plague caused by a rapid increase in pest populations that contributed to the deaths millions of people around the world during the middle ages.

(A)undermining the theory of a plague caused by a rapid increase in pest populations that
(B)undermining the theory that a plague caused by a rapid increase in pest populations
(C)to undermine the theory that a plague was caused by a rapid increase in pest populations and that
(D)to undermine the theory of a plague caused by a rapid increase in pest populations that
(E)that undermines the theory of a plague that was caused by a rapid increase in pest populations and that

OA
[Reveal] Spoiler:
---------Comes Later-------
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 310
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: epidemiological data [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2009, 10:26
I hope it is E. I would like to know the source and the OA.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 310
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: epidemiological data [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2009, 17:08
this one is confusing me, am just missing something here, waiting eagerly to have a good discussion over it.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: epidemiological data [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2009, 20:56
I'll post the OA but first can you please tell me the reason for choosing B or E?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 196
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: epidemiological data [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2009, 23:05
A recent study of epidemiological data from the past several hundred years has provided new evidence undermining the theory of a plague caused by a rapid increase in pest populations that contributed to the deaths millions of people around the world during the middle ages.

(A)undermining the theory of a plague caused by a rapid increase in pest populations that
THEORY OF A PLAGUE is incorrect structure
(B)undermining the theory that a plague caused by a rapid increase in pest populations
THEORY THAT "a plague caused by x contributed to y" CORRECT FORM AND STRUCTURE
(C)to undermine the theory that a plague was caused by a rapid increase in pest populations and that
"AND THAT" introduces another theory which cannot be supported by "THE THEORY"
(D)to undermine the theory of a plague caused by a rapid increase in pest populations that
EVIDENCE TO cannot be used since there is no CAUSE-EFFECT case here.
THEORY OF is incorrect in this context
(E)that undermines the theory of a plague that was caused by a rapid increase in pest populations and that
EVIDENCE THAT UNDERMINES uses evidence as a restrictive clause i.e. there are many other
evidences but as if we are talking about THE evidence that "undermines the theory..."
NONRESTRICTIVE CLAUSE "which" or participle clause UNDERMINING should be used here
THEORY OF should be THEORY THAT ....
"AND THAT" should be "AND WHICH" or
Let me know if you have gfurther questions
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 153
Location: St. Louis, MO
Schools: Cornell (Bach. of Sci.), UCLA Anderson (MBA)
Followers: 126

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 6

Re: epidemiological data [#permalink] New post 22 Sep 2009, 14:25
1. (A)(B)…new evidence undermining the theory…
(C)(D)…new evidence to undermine the theory…
(E) …new evidence that undermines the theory…
In all cases, the noun new evidence is modified by the following phrase. Arguably, “to undermine” implies intent in a way that “undermining” and “that undermines” don’t, but maybe that’s the intended meaning. I would keep all of these as possibilities.

2. (A)(D)(E) … theory of a plague …
(B)(C) … theory that a plague …
“of” seems unidiomatic to me. You might have a theory about something, or a theory that something is true, but only the “theory of relativity” or the “theory of evolution” come to mind as good theory of something examples. The indefinite article in “a plague” makes it much less iconic than relativity or evolution as something you might have a “theory of.” Even as a native speaker of English, I wouldn’t rule out ADE based on this one, though.

3. (A)(D) …theory of a plague caused by (something) that contributed to the deaths…
(B) …theory that a plague caused by (something) contributed to the deaths…
(C) …theory that a plague was caused by (something) and that contributed…
(E) …theory of a plague that was caused by (something) and that
NOTE: In all choices, (something) = a rapid increase in pest populations

#3 is really several splits, but I think you have to consider them together. Both “of” and “that” following nouns indicate modifying phrases. In the choices that have “and,” we need to look for parallelism. Finally, “caused by” after plague is a modifier (i.e. it answers the question “which plague?”) whereas “was caused” after plague is a verb. What do you all think about these issues?
_________________


Emily Sledge | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | St. Louis

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 310
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: epidemiological data [#permalink] New post 22 Sep 2009, 15:57
Thanks for replying Emily, thanks for the split up analysis,
first of all a question in #1 i understood with C, D and E the noun "new evidence" is modified by the respective phrases, where as in A- "undermining" being an -ing participle modifies the subject of the preceding clause, in that case does it modifies "recent study"? i thought "recent study" to be the noun of the previous clause, where am i going wrong? i think a comma before the -ing participle makes a difference, is that applicable here, please clear this is..

As #3 has more splits,i think "caused by" is preferred since we need "which plague" caused it. so B wins?, and it also has "theory that..." as you said "theory of.." seems unidiomatic. am i missing something?
1 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 153
Location: St. Louis, MO
Schools: Cornell (Bach. of Sci.), UCLA Anderson (MBA)
Followers: 126

Kudos [?]: 198 [1] , given: 6

Re: epidemiological data [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2009, 14:07
1
This post received
KUDOS
crejoc wrote:
Thanks for replying Emily, thanks for the split up analysis,
first of all a question in #1 i understood with C, D and E the noun "new evidence" is modified by the respective phrases, where as in A- "undermining" being an -ing participle modifies the subject of the preceding clause, in that case does it modifies "recent study"? i thought "recent study" to be the noun of the previous clause, where am i going wrong? i think a comma before the -ing participle makes a difference, is that applicable here, please clear this is..

As #3 has more splits,i think "caused by" is preferred since we need "which plague" caused it. so B wins?, and it also has "theory that..." as you said "theory of.." seems unidiomatic. am i missing something?

Ah, you are definitely thinking of the rule for when -ing follows a comma. In that case, the present participle modifies the preceding clause, or can be considered to modify the subject of that preceding clause.

However, when an -ing word follows a noun directly, with no comma, it acts as a noun modifier and follows the rule that noun modifiers touch the modified noun. Thus, "undermining" in A and B modifies "evidence."

In my view, B is correct. Ultimately parallelism and modifier placement decided it for me, especially the choice between B and C.

(B) …theory that a plague caused by (something) contributed to the deaths…

(C) …theory that a plague was caused by (something) and that contributed…: Parallelism between "that a plague was caused by..." and "that contributed to the deaths" indicates that both relative clauses modify "theory." But the theory itself did not contribute to the deaths of millions!

NOTE: In all choices, (something) = a rapid increase in pest populations
_________________


Emily Sledge | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | St. Louis

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: epidemiological data [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2009, 22:08
The OA (that is available to me) is B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 109
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: epidemiological data [#permalink] New post 13 Nov 2009, 20:19
B

Theory that ... is better than theory of ...

theory ... contributed to ... constitutes illogical meaning
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 196
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: epidemiological data [#permalink] New post 14 Nov 2009, 00:00
as explanied earlier,ANSWER IS B
Re: epidemiological data   [#permalink] 14 Nov 2009, 00:00
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic *Fresh* According to recent study data, greenhouse gas souvik101990 9 18 Aug 2014, 05:16
According to recent study data, greenhouse gas emissions doe007 3 17 May 2013, 00:04
A recent study has discovered that during the past few djmehta 1 08 Mar 2011, 22:07
A recent national study of the trash discarded in several gmataquaguy 16 13 Sep 2005, 18:40
Several recent studies suggest that a child born into a jxx 5 29 Sep 2004, 17:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A recent study of epidemiological data from the past several

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.