A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 06 Dec 2016, 10:29

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 177
Location: uk
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Mar 2011, 19:22
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

40% (02:06) correct 60% (01:32) wrong based on 43 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County found that, of the severely injured drivers and front-seat passengers, 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. This indicates that, by wearing seat belts, drivers and front-seat passengers can greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured if they are in an auto accident.

The conclusion above is not properly drawn unless which of the following is true?

(A) Of all the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(B) Considerably more than 20 percent of drivers and front-seat passengers in Dole County always wear seat belts when traveling by car.
(C) More drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey than rear-seat passengers were very severely injured.
(D) More than half of the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(E) Most of the auto accidents reported to police in Dole County do not involve any serious injury.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 920
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 331 [1] , given: 123

Re: A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Mar 2011, 03:16
1
KUDOS
This argument is causal and we know that alternate cause weakens the causal arg. The conclusion depends on the evidence that 80% of front seat passengers were not wearing the seat belts.

If more than 20% of front seat passengers were wearing seat belts then that figure could be 85% i.e. 85% of front seat passengers wearing seatbelts and still end up getting injured. So a more likely explanation of the situation is an alternate cause. And we know that alternate cause weakens the causal arg.

Hence A.

dips wrote:
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County found that, of the severely injured drivers and front-seat passengers, 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. This indicates that, by wearing seat belts, drivers and front-seat passengers can greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured if they are in an auto accident.

The conclusion above is not properly drawn unless which of the following is true?

(A) Of all the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(B) Considerably more than 20 percent of drivers and front-seat passengers in Dole County always wear seat belts when traveling by car.
(C) More drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey than rear-seat passengers were very severely injured.
(D) More than half of the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(E) Most of the auto accidents reported to police in Dole County do not involve any serious injury.
SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1672
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 505 [0], given: 36

Re: A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Apr 2011, 08:03
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2011
Posts: 83
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 42

Re: A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Apr 2011, 08:43
Good question,A it is.
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 565
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 13

Re: A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Apr 2011, 09:57
dips wrote:
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County found that, of the severely injured drivers and front-seat passengers, 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents. This indicates that, by wearing seat belts, drivers and front-seat passengers can greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured if they are in an auto accident.

The conclusion above is not properly drawn unless which of the following is true?

(A) Of all the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey, more than 20 percent were wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(B) Considerably more than 20 percent of drivers and front-seat passengers in Dole County always wear seat belts when traveling by car.
(C) More drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey than rear-seat passengers were very severely injured.
(D) More than half of the drivers and front-seat passengers in the survey were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents.
(E) Most of the auto accidents reported to police in Dole County do not involve any serious injury.

Can someone plug in the numbers and explain this to me ...This is what an expert in other forum explained:
"Plug in that 100 in the survey were seriously injured.
According to the argument, 20 wore seat belts, 80 did not.
Negated, answer choice A would say that perhaps only 10% of all the drivers/passengers wore seat belts.
Since 20 = 10% of 200, we could have 200 total in the survey, 20 who wore seat belts, 200-20=180 who did not.
Since 80 did not wear seat belts and were seriously injured, and 180 in total did not wear seat belts, 180-80 = 100 did not wear seat belts and avoided serious injury.
Thus, a majority of those who did not wear seat belts would have avoided serious injury, invalidating the conclusion that seat beats prevent serious injury.
Since the scenario above invalidates the conclusion and is possible when answer choice A is negated, the argument is assuming that answer choice A is true: that more than 20% of the people in the survey wore seat belts."

Now my question is ..how can he equate 10% of X = 20, bcoz according to the arguement;A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County found that, of the severely injured drivers and front-seat passengers, 80 percent were not wearing seat belts at the time of their accidents... i believe its 80% of seriously injured or should i remove the sentence between the comma and read 80% of all the auto accidents- i doubt this...

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1353
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 236 [0], given: 10

Re: A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jun 2011, 08:08
A and B are closest.

A fits the bill.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 707
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 160 [0], given: 37

Re: A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jun 2011, 17:55
A for me.

80% of SEVERLY injured were not wearing seat belts. This means 20 % of Severly injured were wearing seat belts. In addition, some of the non-severly injured would also be wearing seat belts. That means more than 20 % of all people were wearing seat belts if the conclusion has to hold true.

Crick
Re: A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County   [#permalink] 15 Jun 2011, 17:55
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County 11 02 May 2008, 07:38
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County 1 10 Jul 2007, 10:08
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County 4 02 Jun 2007, 07:52
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County 7 18 Mar 2007, 19:35
A recent survey of all auto accident victims in Dole County 4 15 Dec 2006, 11:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by