Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 23:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 126 [2] , given: 0

A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2008, 23:06
2
This post received
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (02:13) correct 41% (01:26) wrong based on 710 sessions
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition
Practice Question
Question No.: 7
Page: 118
Difficulty:


A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of immune-system activity tend to score much lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune-system activity. The researcher concluded from this experiment that the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against physical disease.

The researcher’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?

A. High immune-system activity protects against mental illness better than normal immune-system activity does.
B. Mental illness is similar to physical disease in its effects on body systems.
C. People with high immune-system activity cannot develop mental illness.
D. Mental illness does not cause people’s immune-system activity to decrease.
E. Psychological treatment of mental illness is not as effective as is medical treatment.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by dentobizz on 21 Oct 2013, 21:05, edited 3 times in total.
Adding OA and Formatting
Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 735
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 0

Re: CR- immune system [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2008, 23:15
ritula wrote:
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of immune-system activity tend to score much
lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune-system activity. The researcher
concluded from this experiment that the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against
physical disease.
The researcher’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?
A. High immune-system activity protects against mental illness better than normal immune-system activity
does.
B. Mental illness is similar to physical disease in its effects on body systems.
C. People with high immune-system activity cannot develop mental illness.
D. Mental illness does not cause people’s immune-system activity to decrease.
E. Psychological treatment of mental illness is not as effective as is medical treatment.


C.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 325
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Re: CR- immune system [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2008, 23:17
ritula wrote:
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of immune-system activity tend to score much
lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune-system activity. The researcher
concluded from this experiment that the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against
physical disease.
The researcher’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?
A. High immune-system activity protects against mental illness better than normal immune-system activity
does.
B. Mental illness is similar to physical disease in its effects on body systems.
C. People with high immune-system activity cannot develop mental illness.
D. Mental illness does not cause people’s immune-system activity to decrease. ( This is the answer ? if mental illness causes people's immune-sytem activity to decrease then cause-effect relationship is reversed and argument falls apart)
E. Psychological treatment of mental illness is not as effective as is medical treatment.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 283
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Re: CR- immune system [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2008, 00:31
D is the clear winner here

what is the OA for this
_________________

The world is continuous, but the mind is discrete

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

Re: CR- immune system [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2008, 00:54
Yes D is the OA. Can u give the explanation as well?
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 244
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [2] , given: 0

Re: CR- immune system [#permalink] New post 06 Jun 2008, 07:13
2
This post received
KUDOS
ritula wrote:
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of immune-system activity tend to score much lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune-system activity. The researcher concluded from this experiment that the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against physical disease.
The researcher’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?
A. High immune-system activity protects against mental illness better than normal immune-system activity
does.
B. Mental illness is similar to physical disease in its effects on body systems.
C. People with high immune-system activity cannot develop mental illness.
D. Mental illness does not cause people’s immune-system activity to decrease.
E. Psychological treatment of mental illness is not as effective as is medical treatment.


D
The author concludes that "the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against physical disease", So the implication is that better immune system protects people from mental/physical illnesses. The author must assume that the reversal is not true that mental illness is not the cause of decreased immune system activity in the first place.
Negate this assumption and the argument falls apart.

Hope this helps.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 44
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 15

Re: A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of [#permalink] New post 08 Jul 2012, 02:17
still not convinced with negation theory, help plz :(
Expert Post
4 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 3670 [4] , given: 185

Re: A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of [#permalink] New post 08 Jul 2012, 13:46
4
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Manav,

This is a classical causal argument. Note how the argument is presented:

The author starts with an observation that

low levels of immune-system and lower score on tests of mental health occur together. Based on this co-incidence, the author concludes Immune system protects against mental illness.

Now this begs the question, what about the scenario in which mental health impacted immune system (reverse causation) such that low score on mental health caused low immune system performance. However, since the author discounts such a scenario, he assumes such a scenario will not occur. Choice D says the same and is your answer.

Below is another similar argument. Can you find the assumption (along the same lines) in that argument.

A study followed a group of teenagers who had never smoked and tracked whether they took up smoking and how their mental health changed. After one year, the incidence of depression among those who had taken up smoking was four times as high as it was among those who had not. Since nicotine in cigarettes changes brain chemistry, perhaps thereby affecting mood, it is likely that smoking contributes to depression in teenagers


_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 37
Location: Canada
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q47 V40
GPA: 3.78
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 55

Re: A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of [#permalink] New post 02 Aug 2012, 11:42
egmat wrote:
Manav,

This is a classical causal argument. Note how the argument is presented:

The author starts with an observation that

low levels of immune-system and lower score on tests of mental health occur together. Based on this co-incidence, the author concludes Immune system protects against mental illness.

Now this begs the question, what about the scenario in which mental health impacted immune system (reverse causation) such that low score on mental health caused low immune system performance. However, since the author discounts such a scenario, he assumes such a scenario will not occur. Choice D says the same and is your answer.

Below is another similar argument. Can you find the assumption (along the same lines) in that argument.

A study followed a group of teenagers who had never smoked and tracked whether they took up smoking and how their mental health changed. After one year, the incidence of depression among those who had taken up smoking was four times as high as it was among those who had not. Since nicotine in cigarettes changes brain chemistry, perhaps thereby affecting mood, it is likely that smoking contributes to depression in teenagers



Let me take a crack at the assumption here then e-GMAT.

Conclusion: It is likely that smoking contributes to depression in teenagers
How did we reach the conclusion?
The study that tracked teenagers who took up smoking and how their mental health changed over one year. These teenage smokers were 4x more depressed than their non-smoking counterparts.
Why?
Nicotine changes brain chemistry, affecting one's mood.

Assumptions:
- Both groups of teenagers were equally comparable before they started smoking. In other words, one group was not more prone to depression already before they took up smoking.
- The cigarettes that the teenagers smoked contained nicotine
And, along the same lines as what we saw in the example above:
- The nicotine in cigarettes caused the depression. The depression feelings did not however influence these teenagers to smoke.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2012
Posts: 117
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 57

A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of.. [#permalink] New post 11 Apr 2013, 20:50
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of immune-system activity tend to score much
lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune-system activity. The researcher
concluded from this experiment that the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against
physical disease.
The researcher's conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?
A. High immune-system activity protects against mental illness better than normal immune-system activity
does.
B. Mental illness is similar to physical disease in its effects on body systems.
C. People with high immune-system activity cannot develop mental illness.
D. Mental illness does not cause people's immune-system activity to decrease.
E. Psychological treatment of mental illness is not as effective as is medical treatment.

Classic GMAT question :-)
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1120
Location: United States
Followers: 136

Kudos [?]: 1374 [0], given: 122

Re: A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of [#permalink] New post 11 Apr 2013, 23:07
ritula wrote:
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of immune-system activity tend to score much
lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune-system activity. The researcher
concluded from this experiment that the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against
physical disease.
The researcher’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?
A. High immune-system activity protects against mental illness better than normal immune-system activity
does.
B. Mental illness is similar to physical disease in its effects on body systems.
C. People with high immune-system activity cannot develop mental illness.
D. Mental illness does not cause people’s immune-system activity to decrease.
E. Psychological treatment of mental illness is not as effective as is medical treatment.


The question used cause and effect logic.
A & B both happen.
A --> B, only if B does NOT cause A

D is correct.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of [#permalink] New post 29 Apr 2013, 08:01
ritula wrote:
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of immune-system activity tend to score much
lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune-system activity. The researcher
concluded from this experiment that the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against
physical disease.
The researcher’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?
A. High immune-system activity protects against mental illness better than normal immune-system activity
does.
B. Mental illness is similar to physical disease in its effects on body systems.
C. People with high immune-system activity cannot develop mental illness.
D. Mental illness does not cause people’s immune-system activity to decrease.
E. Psychological treatment of mental illness is not as effective as is medical treatment.


I picked C.I am not finding why c is wrong.Can u explain why c is wrong?
Expert Post
7 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 3670 [7] , given: 185

Re: A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of [#permalink] New post 29 Apr 2013, 21:39
7
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
supri23 wrote:
ritula wrote:
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of immune-system activity tend to score much
lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune-system activity. The researcher
concluded from this experiment that the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against
physical disease.
The researcher’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?
A. High immune-system activity protects against mental illness better than normal immune-system activity
does.
B. Mental illness is similar to physical disease in its effects on body systems.
C. People with high immune-system activity cannot develop mental illness.
D. Mental illness does not cause people’s immune-system activity to decrease.
E. Psychological treatment of mental illness is not as effective as is medical treatment.


I picked C.I am not finding why c is wrong.Can u explain why c is wrong?


Hi,

To tackle your doubt, let me begin from the passage itself.

Understanding the Passage

A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of immune-system activity tend to score much lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune-system activity.

This statement talks about a discovery by a researcher. The researcher discovered that people who have

low immune system activity have lower mental health
normal or high immune system activity have better mental health.

So, what he saw was that mental health increased with increase in immune system activity.

The researcher concluded from this experiment that the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against physical disease.

The researcher thought about the reason as to why this pattern exists. He thought an explanation for this pattern is that immune system protects against mental illness or poor mental health. If his explanation is true, then people with lower immune system should have poorer mental health than people with normal or higher immune system activity. This is what he has observed. So, he made the conclusion as stated in the above statement of the passage.

Pre-thinking Assumption

Now, what is the assumption built in the conclusion drawn by the researcher?

The assumption is that there is no other explanation which could explain the given observed pattern. If there are other explanations for the observed pattern, then it would cast a serious doubt on the conclusion drawn by the author.

Now, what could be an alternate explanation?

This could be a hard question for people new to causal arguments but for people who have done some practice of causal arguments, they can figure out the answer to this quite easily.

Remember, the researchers concluded that immune system protects against mental illness because this can explain the observed pattern. Now, if we say that mental illness causes decline in immune system activity, then even this statement could explain the given observed pattern (where both immune system activity and mental health increase or decrease simultaneously). Now, if this could also be an explanation, then the author must have considered this explanation and 'assumed' that this cannot be be true.

So, an assumption in the above argument is that mental illness does not cause people’s immune-system activity to decrease. This is what option D is.

Now, coming to option C:

People with high immune-system activity cannot develop mental illness.

First of all, we need to think why does the author need to assume this? Remember a golden rule:

The author assumes only those things without which his argument will not hold true.

For this reason, the 'assumptions' are called must be true statements, which means that the assumptions must be true for the conclusion to hold true.

Now, is Option C a must be true statement?

What if option C is false i.e. People with high immune-system activity can develop mental illness. Will it falsify the conclusion?

The answer is No. The conclusion can still hold even when this statement is false. Therefore, it cannot be an assumption.

Hope this helps :)

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2295
Followers: 276

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of [#permalink] New post 28 May 2014, 18:14
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 149
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 22

Re: A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of [#permalink] New post 29 May 2014, 22:44
Yes, it is typical "defender" mode for causal arguments. The assumption eliminate alternative cause, reverse causation (in this case) or data invalidity
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 6
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT Date: 08-01-2014
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 18

CAT Tests
OG VR2 #7 Pls help [#permalink] New post 08 Oct 2014, 08:43
A researcher discovered that people who have low
levels of immune-system activity tend to score much
lower on tests of mental health than do people with
normal or high immune-system activity. The researcher
concluded from this experiment that the immune
system protects against mental illness as well as
against physical disease.
The researcher’s conclusion depends on which of the
following assumptions?

(A) High immune-system activity protects against
mental illness better than normal immunesystem
activity does.
(B) Mental illness is similar to physical disease in its
effects on body systems.
(C) People with high immune-system activity cannot
develop mental illness.
(D) Mental illness does not cause people’s immunesystem
activity to decrease.
(E) Psychological treatment of mental illness is not
as effective as is medical treatment.

I am trying to apply pre-thinking here but still getting it wrong.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 223
Concentration: Technology, Other
Schools: ISB '15, IIMA
GMAT Date: 09-29-2014
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 268

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2014, 05:12
arpshriv wrote:
A researcher discovered that people who have low
levels of immune-system activity tend to score much
lower on tests of mental health than do people with
normal or high immune-system activity. The researcher
concluded from this experiment that the immune
system protects against mental illness as well as
against physical disease.
The researcher’s conclusion depends on which of the
following assumptions?

(A) High immune-system activity protects against
mental illness better than normal immunesystem
activity does.
(B) Mental illness is similar to physical disease in its
effects on body systems.
(C) People with high immune-system activity cannot
develop mental illness.
(D) Mental illness does not cause people’s immunesystem
activity to decrease.
(E) Psychological treatment of mental illness is not
as effective as is medical treatment.

I am trying to apply pre-thinking here but still getting it wrong.


Can you share ur analysis in terms of premise and conclusion. That wld help to identify the mistake with ur reasoning.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards :)

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2013
Posts: 34
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

Re: A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2014, 10:28
JarvisR wrote:
arpshriv wrote:
A researcher discovered that people who have low
levels of immune-system activity tend to score much
lower on tests of mental health than do people with
normal or high immune-system activity. The researcher
concluded from this experiment that the immune
system protects against mental illness as well as
against physical disease.
The researcher’s conclusion depends on which of the
following assumptions?

(A) High immune-system activity protects against
mental illness better than normal immunesystem
activity does.
(B) Mental illness is similar to physical disease in its
effects on body systems.
(C) People with high immune-system activity cannot
develop mental illness.
(D) Mental illness does not cause people’s immunesystem
activity to decrease.
(E) Psychological treatment of mental illness is not
as effective as is medical treatment.

I am trying to apply pre-thinking here but still getting it wrong.


Can you share ur analysis in terms of premise and conclusion. That wld help to identify the mistake with ur reasoning.



A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of immune-system activity tend to score much lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune-system activity. The researcher concluded from this experiment that the immune system protects against mental illness as well as against physical disease.
The researcher’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?

Conclusion: immune system protects against mental illness as well as against physical disease.
Premise: low levels of immune-system activity tend to score much lower on tests of mental health than do people with normal or high immune-system activity.

As per my analysis, In premise the author did not speak about the immune system's protection against physical diseases. But the conclusion states about the Physical disease. So an answer that fills this gap could be an answer.

(A) High immune-system activity protects against mental illness better than normal immune system activity does. Irrelevant to draw the conclusion.
(B) Mental illness is similar to physical disease in its effects on body systems.
I felt this is the correct answer as this fills in the gap related to physical diseases.
(C) People with high immune-system activity cannot develop mental illness.
(D) Mental illness does not cause people’s immune system activity to decrease.
(E) Psychological treatment of mental illness is not as effective as is medical treatment. Irrelevant to draw the conclusion.

As C & D are not talking about Physical disease, I thought they are incorrect. :(

Clearly, I am missing something here. Can someone help?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2013
Posts: 38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 70

A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2014, 14:50
I choose D.

Among all type of trick one of the trick to crack assumption question is - remove all alternative cause to the problem.
Here it is mention x( low -immune system) cause mental illness and some physical problem.
conclusion - y( high -immune system protect the mental health n pp)


see the cause for the problem that is X and x cause y -make sense
y cause x - reverse- destroy -uncertain
but Y doesn't cause x - is true and states the same point in reverse order.

so assumption is - a patient with low immune system can have mental unsoundness but patient suffering from mental issues not necessarily have low immune system some other cause can be also be responsible - y doesn't cause x.

I am not sure whether it is true or not but i use this Trick - for such question when struck between two option check out extreme word like option c - sounds right but use of "Cannot" doesn't justify argument, as it says good immune system protect against mental illness but will not cause any damage certainly - is not claimed. so c is removed.
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of   [#permalink] 14 Oct 2014, 14:50
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A researcher discovered that people who have low-levels of Hang Tuah 7 18 Jan 2007, 03:24
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of sperinko 5 17 Aug 2006, 03:34
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of rahulraao 7 18 Sep 2005, 16:51
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of kdhong 9 11 Jul 2005, 19:28
A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of vivek123 9 07 Jun 2005, 20:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A researcher discovered that people who have low levels of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.