Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 May 2013, 09:05
Customize  |  Hide

A scientist is studying bacteria whose cell population

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 41
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 20

A scientist is studying bacteria whose cell population [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2008, 14:32
A scientist is studying bacteria whose cell population doubles at constant intervals, at which times each cell in the population divides simultaneously. Four hours from now, immediately after the population doubles, the scientist will destroy the entire sample. How many cells will the population contain when the bacteria is destroyed?

(1) Since the population divided two hours ago, the population has quadrupled, increasing by 3,750 cells.

(2) The population will double to 40,000 cells with one hour remaining until the scientist destroys the sample.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 41
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 20

Re: multiplying bacteria Q2 [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2008, 14:40
IMO answer is A.

given: population double every constant time interval.
1) population has quadrupled (double * double) in last two hours. => popuoation doubles every hr
lets say original population was x then now it is x+3750
and 3x=3750
therefore current population = 3750*4/3
hence the current population is know at the time interval when it double is known=1hr
therefore we can guess the population after 4hrs

2) if the population doubles 1 hr before the destruction then the constant time interval at which population increases is 3hr.
so the next split would be after 6hrs.... but the destruction was to happen aftr 4hr???
there is a contradiction over here. and hence we should ignore point (2

-pl share your views
Director
Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 635
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: multiplying bacteria Q2 [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2008, 14:56
agree with A. I misinterpreted condition 1 again ...
Director
Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 635
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: multiplying bacteria Q2 [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2008, 15:00
maratikus wrote:
agree with A. I misinterpreted condition 1 again ...


actually don't agree. what if interval is 45 min -> condition 1 still holds but results are going to be different
Director
Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 635
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: multiplying bacteria Q2 [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2008, 15:06
the answer is C.

1) number of bacteria two hours ago was 1,250 and interval c: c > 2/3 and c <=1 -> insufficient
2) bacteria doubles at 3 hours, the number is equal to 40,000 -> insufficient

1&2: since bacteria doubles 2 hours before 0 and 3 hours after 0 -> 5*c = integer -> c = integer/5

since 40,000/1,250 = 32 = 2^5 -> bacteria doubled 5 times in 5 hours -> c = 5 -> sufficient
Re: multiplying bacteria Q2   [#permalink] 01 Jul 2008, 15:06
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts A scientist is studying bacteria whose cell population ArvGMAT 5 16 Jun 2007, 20:20
New posts A scientist is studying bacteria whose cell population trahul4 4 15 Jul 2007, 07:14
New posts A scientist is studying bacteria whose cell population iamba 1 16 Jul 2007, 17:46
Popular new posts 7 Q)) A scientist is studying bacteria whose cell population punyadeep 18 16 Mar 2011, 06:55
New posts 1 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC A scientist is studying bacteria whose cell population mun23 2 20 Feb 2013, 16:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A scientist is studying bacteria whose cell population

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.