Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Sep 2014, 20:51

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A scientist made three observations: (1) in the world's

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
A scientist made three observations: (1) in the world's [#permalink] New post 08 Jan 2004, 22:20
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

33% (03:38) correct 67% (02:18) wrong based on 7 sessions
22. A scientist made three observations: (1) in the world's temperate zones, food is more plentiful in the ocean than it is in fresh water; (2) migratory fish in temperate zones generally mature in the ocean and spawn in fresh water; and (3) migratory fish need much nourishment as they mature but little or none during the part of their lives when they spawn. On the basis of those observations, the scientist formulated the hypothesis that food availability is a determining factor in the migration of migratory fish. Subsequently the scientist learned that in the tropics migratory fish generally mature in fresh water and spawn in the ocean.

Which one of the following would it be most helpful to know in order to judge whether what the scientist subsequently learned calls into question the hypothesis?

(A) whether in the world's temperate zones, the temperatures of bodies of fresh water tend to be lower than those of the regions of the oceans into which they flow

(B) whether the types of foods that migratory fish eat while they inhabit the ocean are similar to those that they eat while they inhabit bodies of fresh water

(C) whether any species of fish with populations in temperate zones also have populations that live in the tropics

(D) whether there are more species of migratory fish in the tropics than there are in temperate zones

(E) whether in the tropics food is less plentiful in the ocean than in fresh water
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 1
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2004, 01:44
E is the answer.
For the assumption to become hypothesis the scientist needs to know about the pattern of food availability in tropics.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2004, 05:27
what is the question trying to ask. is it "which of the follwing should be determined if whatever he learned later questions the hypothesis?" Meaning which if determined will cast dount on the hypothesis?
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2004, 06:45
Hi folks can you please answer my question in the second post.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 246
Location: MI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2004, 06:53
anandnk wrote:
what is the question trying to ask. is it "which of the follwing should be determined if whatever he learned later questions the hypothesis?" Meaning which if determined will cast dount on the hypothesis?


Correct. You are on the right track.
We have to determine what if found about the latter discovery will weaken the earlier hypothesis.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2004, 06:56
Hi sandeep,

The B talks about the availability of the food still. This is what the hypothesis states as a conclusion.

What do you think?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 246
Location: MI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2004, 07:08
anandnk wrote:
Hi sandeep,

The B talks about the availability of the food still. This is what the hypothesis states as a conclusion.

What do you think?


The conclusion is that food availability is a determining factor for migration among fish. However, if we don't know whether the fish eat the same kind of food, we cannot reach this conclusion.
Lets say the fish change thier foods according to places they migrate, then clearly food cannot the determining factor in migration of fish. This is exactly what B says, that the foods of the fish before and after have to be same. If not, it will weaken the hypothesis.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2004, 07:35
Your explaination brings about the same question on both the observations. What about the scenario where oceans in tropics dont have more food than available in the fresh water. Then second observation is supported and at the same time first hypothesis is refuted.


Looks like everyone is trying to avoid getting fired.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 246
Location: MI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2004, 07:57
anandnk wrote:
Your explaination brings about the same question on both the observations. What about the scenario where oceans in tropics dont have more food than available in the fresh water. Then second observation is supported and at the same time first hypothesis is refuted.


Looks like everyone is trying to avoid getting fired.


How does Option E refute the hypothesis ?
If food is less plentiful in the ocean, it justifies/strengthens the hypothesis that fish move from fresh water (more food) to oceans (less food). Isn't it ?
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2004, 08:06
The question is not asking for refuting for sure. It is asking whether it will be helpful in judging if the first hypothesis is wrong.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2010
Posts: 584
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 7

Re: A scientist made three observations: (1) in the world's [#permalink] New post 25 Nov 2011, 06:20
Can someone please explain why B is incorrect?

I got the question right. But I'm not sure why B is wrong here. My reasoning with B goes like this:

If the fish in tropical area moved into the ocean or fresh water not in accordance with food availability (which is author's hypothesis), then that would definitely help to question his hypothesis.

Please explain.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 583
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 16

GMAT Tests User
Re: A scientist made three observations: (1) in the world's [#permalink] New post 25 Nov 2011, 18:50
I will go with E, what is the OA?
_________________

+1 Kudos If found helpful..

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2010
Posts: 584
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 7

Re: A scientist made three observations: (1) in the world's [#permalink] New post 27 Nov 2011, 06:48
E is the OA, but why is B wrong?
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 817
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
Schools: Ross '17, Duke '16
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 36

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 42

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: A scientist made three observations: (1) in the world's [#permalink] New post 12 Dec 2011, 23:42
anandnk wrote:
22. A scientist made three observations: (1) in the world's temperate zones, food is more plentiful in the ocean than it is in fresh water; (2) migratory fish in temperate zones generally mature in the ocean and spawn in fresh water; and (3) migratory fish need much nourishment as they mature but little or none during the part of their lives when they spawn. On the basis of those observations, the scientist formulated the hypothesis that food availability is a determining factor in the migration of migratory fish. Subsequently the scientist learned that in the tropics migratory fish generally mature in fresh water and spawn in the ocean.

Which one of the following would it be most helpful to know in order to judge whether what the scientist subsequently learned calls into question the hypothesis?

(B) whether the types of foods that migratory fish eat while they inhabit the ocean are similar to those that they eat while they inhabit bodies of fresh water

(E) whether in the tropics food is less plentiful in the ocean than in fresh water


nonameee wrote:
E is the OA, but why is B wrong?


Premise (1) Ocean food > fresh water food
(2) migratory fish mature in Ocean BUT spawn in Fresh water
(3) migratory fish eat more food in Ocean > in Fresh water food

Hypothesis: FOOD AVAILABILITY is a determining factor in the migration of migratory fish

BUT the scientist learned that in the TROPICS migratory fish generally mature in fresh water and spawn in the ocean.

Choice B does not say anything about the abundance of food that preferred by TROPICS migratory fish between OCEAN and FRESH WATER. Rather, it only said about KIND OF FOOD => that is irrelevant. You are cheated at this point.

Hope that helps
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 186
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: A scientist made three observations: (1) in the world's [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2011, 11:26
E
Re: A scientist made three observations: (1) in the world's   [#permalink] 26 Dec 2011, 11:26
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The World’s Youngest Self-Made Billionaires PTK 0 11 Sep 2011, 01:17
Scientists observation optimisticAL 1 27 Dec 2009, 07:39
Scientists have observed large concentrations of heavy-metal lexis 2 16 Jun 2008, 11:26
Scientists have observed large concentrations of heavy-metal bmwhype2 4 22 Jul 2007, 15:16
Scientists have observed large concentrations of heavy-metal b14kumar 3 21 May 2006, 19:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A scientist made three observations: (1) in the world's

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.